July 17th, 2008
We told you earlier about Oklahoma County commissioner Brent Rinehart’s new comic book that (literally) demonizes homosexuality — complete with the words “anal sodomy.”
Now via Reason.com, we have two pages from that comic book. (Click on the images for the full-size version).
Rinehart says it took two months to write this comic book. I don’t think Marvel has anything to be worried about though. After two months, Rinehart’s still trying to figure out whether child molesters are “pedaphiles” or “pedifiles.”
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Emily K
July 17th, 2008
He should have said “homosexual MEN” instead of “homosexuals.” There aren’t any women.
I bet lesbians turn him on.
homer
July 17th, 2008
Aren’t comic books supposed to be funny? And have artistic value? And written by people with a measurable IQ?
MirrorMan
July 17th, 2008
This look like a job for HeteroMan!!!
Or maybe the ambiguously Gay Duo?
Emily K
July 17th, 2008
This offends me more as a cartoonist than as a gay.
Patrick ONeill
July 17th, 2008
Did you see the Arizona Republicans running for Congress interviewed ?
It turns out that they are agains gay marriage because sodomy is addictive and is caused by people visiting whorehouses in Nogales.
Enlightening
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/video/player.php?file=071408CongR-Gay-Marriage
PiaSharn
July 17th, 2008
Well, the comic was actually drawn by Shane Suiters, not Rinehart, so maybe the spelling and grammar errors are her fault. Either way, it’s still pretty pathetic.
Emily K: “He should have said ‘homosexual MEN’ instead of ‘homosexuals.’ There aren’t any women.”
I’ve found that people like him don’t believe that lesbians exist. We’re either just experimenting or have had a bad experience with a man. When Mr. Right shows up, we’ll forget all of that silly nonsense.
homer: “Aren’t comic books supposed to be funny? And have artistic value? And written by people with a measurable IQ?”
Yeah, but then we wouldn’t have Chick Tracts!
quo III
July 17th, 2008
Piasharn,
I was waiting for someone to mention Chick Tracts. The comparison is really unfair, however; Chick Tracts are much better than this.
Buffy
July 17th, 2008
Wow. I can’t believe he has the gumption to send that out and admit he created it himself. I’d be so humiliated.
Scott
July 17th, 2008
According to the comic he’s a “Roads scholar”. He might have told the artist that it’s “Rhodes Scholar”.
Samantha Davis
July 17th, 2008
Wow, that was contract work?! That’s pretty sad. My money says she didn’t have an art degree, I hope.
Rob
July 17th, 2008
Poor Oklahomans; another politico has caught “The Kern”.
Emily K
July 17th, 2008
LOLZ, “chick tracks” are considered so noxious, outrageous, and ridiculous by many CHRISTIAN booksellers that they won’t even carry them.
Oh, and, art school-trained artist talking here: Chick’s artwork ranges from buffoonish to overdramatic (he has a couple ppl working for him I think). But the writing is ALWAYS ridonkulous. That’s right. I used that word. Because it’s the only word that does it justice.
Gary
July 17th, 2008
How terribly sad.
Chick Tracts are at least somewhat coherent and have a modicum of art value.
I thought he had a 12 year old draw it.
BTW, Brent seems to have forgotten that the SCOTUS invalidated sodomy laws in ALL fifty states (like it or not Oklahoma is one of them), the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico in 2003.
Gary
July 17th, 2008
also, you can view all 16 pages of this masterpiece here:
http://downloads.newsok.com/documents/rinehartcartoon.pdf
Emily K
July 17th, 2008
PiaSharn, thanks for clearing that up a bit. It helps me solve this mystery as to why people who say “homosexuals” never include women in their bigotry.
PSUdain
July 17th, 2008
Yeah, I agree, Chick tracts are at least unintentionally funny, if quite pathetic and a little sad. This thing is just plain old pathetic and REALLY sad. There are some other choice grammatical errors, too, “ask’s” as the singular present conjugation of “to ask” as well as a glaring instance of “your” instead of “you’re”.
Perhaps Sherlock Holmes was right; when you fill your “brain attic” with useless junk (like this claptrap) you eventually run out of space and have to get rid of the useful stuff (like spelling, grammar, and common sense).
Or as C.S. Lewis’s character, the Professor queried, “I wonder, what DO they teach them at these schools?”
Robguy
July 18th, 2008
Scott – I think they really meant a road’s scholar…
GDad
July 18th, 2008
It’s like that sad middle-schooler who keeps writing “I am so cool” on his book covers.
Willie Hewes
July 18th, 2008
Did you notice how the people putting their thumbs down have left hands on their right arms? And how the little boyscout appears to be levitating AND digging his heels in? (At least, that’s what I THINK the artist was going for…)
I’m with Emily, the homophobia is eye-roll-worthy, the comic however is a crime against art.
As for the 12 year old comment: I know 12 year olds who could do better. I honestly do. Well, OK, I know one.
Snappyback
July 18th, 2008
Wouldn’t it have been much easier for him to just say “I’m a big self-loathing closet case”?
Leave A Comment