Indiana’s Proposed Marriage Ban Defeated

Jim Burroway

April 4th, 2007

The proposed amendment to Indiana’s constitution to ban same-sex marriage failed to make it out of the House Rules and Legislative Procedure Committee, which effectively kills it for the year. As with Arizona’s defeat of a similar measure, the hangup was with the second part of the proposed amendment which would have effectively banned other forms of partnerships or recognitions similar to marriage — including many protections enjoyed by unmarried heterosexual couples.

We’ve seen clauses similar to this used in attempts to overturn domestic violence laws in Ohio, strip Michigan employees of health insurance, and more recently, to  try to deny hospital visitation rights to unmarried couples in Minnesota.

Lynn David

April 6th, 2007

Yep! We sure did!

Along with companies such as Eli Lilly, the pharmaceutical maker; E.I. Cummins, a diesel engine manufacturer; Wellpoint Health Networks; Dow AgroSciences; and Emmis Communications, which helped considerably, as well as input from some state universities.

Lynn David

April 7th, 2007

It should also be noted that the House committe will undoubtably reconsider SJR-7 in the next session. If passed out of committee, the greater House will surely pass it, which puts the amendment on the 2008 ballot. Such an amendment will likely be passed by the electorate.

Were the “2nd sentence” which affects the ‘legal incidents of marriage’ removed the House committee would have passed the amendment out. The democrats wanted to strip the amendment down to just that, a heterosexual definition of marriage. But the republicans refused to do it because the clock would have been restarted on such an amendment and the earliest it could be voted on would be 2010.

There are evidently a number of revenge tactics going on in the Indiana General Assembly since SJR-7 didn’t pass muster. A number of bills are now getting superfluous amendments that deal with abortion. One would create a licensure program for “Termination of Pregnancy Specialists” with a number of requirements including a $20,000 lincensing fee (See BILERICO).

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.