September 9th, 2008
The Miami Herald is reporting that a Florida judge has found the state’s ban on adoption by gay persons to be unconstitutional:
A Monroe Circuit Court judge has ruled Florida’s 31-year-old gay adoption ban ”unconstitutional” in an order that allows an openly gay Key West foster parent to adopt a teenage boy he has raised since 2001.
Declaring the adoption to be in the boy’s ”best interest,” Circuit Judge David J. Audlin Jr. said the Florida law forbidding gay people from adopting children is contrary to the state Constitution because it singles out a group for punishment.
Based on previous decisions, the decision may not withstand appeal.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Richard W. Fitch
September 9th, 2008
Sounds like another high court has come forward “to legislate” constitutional integrity. Kudos to Judge Audlin! Just one question: who is “Rosie”? [?O’Donnell?]
Emily K
September 10th, 2008
a JUDGE of the COURT is JUDGING whether something is LAWFUL based on the highest LAWS in the nation? SHOCKING!!!
Timothy Kincaid
September 10th, 2008
Richard,
Yes, Rosie O’Donnell who has been an advocate for changing this law. And Anita refers to Anita Bryant who was largely responsible for getting the ban in place.
Priya Lynn
September 10th, 2008
Timothy, what makes you think the decision won’t withstand an appeal?
Richard W. Fitch
September 10th, 2008
Tim – Thanks for the clarification. Oh, Yes!! I remember Anita very well. Back in the mid- late-70’s, I was married and very closeted; but I did my own private protest by boycotting anything from FL oranges and having bananas for breakfast instead, which seems like a fitting replacement. If you haven’t seen the video “For the Bible Tells Me So”, one of the opening scenes is a news conference with Anita getting a pie in the face from a protester. Her reaction is just priceless – a must see. Likewise, I highly recommend the video as a whole. It tells the story of five families dealing with a gay or lesbian child. Bishop Gene Robinson is the primary focus, but the others are also well done. In addition there are comments from academic and religious scholars, including Bishop Desmond Tutu.
L. Junius Brutus
September 10th, 2008
Richard, that pie-in-the-face scene was absolutely priceless. Especially how she and her crazy husband tried to pretend that they weren’t upset and that they were going to ‘pray’ for the individuals who did it – right before her husband went over and threw the remaining pie into the face of one of them.
It was also priceless because of the honesty of the news reporting. ‘Anti-gay crusade’.
Priya Lynn
September 11th, 2008
Well, how about it Timothy, do you have any particular reasons for believing this decision won’t stand appeal or is that just your “gut feeling”?
Timothy Kincaid
September 11th, 2008
Priya Lynn,
It is my opinion that this decision is likely to face appeal. Twice before such decisions were reversed. Therefore, this decision should not be considered a final victory as it may not withstand appeal.
If you disagree you are free to say so.
But kindly avoid demaning “how about it” unless what I’m expressing somehow disagrees with the attached article.
Priya Lynn
September 11th, 2008
Timothy, I hadn’t read the accompanying article before. According to it it is not true that “twice before such decisions were reversed”. It says the first time such a decision was made it was neither published nor appealed.
Priya Lynn
September 11th, 2008
And Timothy, I said “how about it” because you ignored my first question about this.
Leave A Comment