Paul Weyrich is Dead

Timothy Kincaid

December 18th, 2008

Paul Weyrich has always opposed all matters of equality for gay Americans. His activism was based not in idealism but in populism; his opposition was not based on principles but rather on biases and bigotry. He’s considered the father of the movement of emotions-based conservatives known as the moral majority.

Weyrich is dead at age 66. Life expectancy in the US is 77.

To commemorate Weyrich’s way of thinking, I’ll make an outlandish claim. Using a sample size of one, and applying Paul Cameron’s methods of analysis, I now declare that being a anti-gay activist will take 11 years off your life.

For your reading pleasure, here’s some wildly frothing (but fairly typical) homophobic ranting from the late Mr. Weyrich:

Give same-sex couples the “right” to marry and we can expect some severe consequences. For one, the concept of faithfulness to one’s spouse will be further undermined given that many so-called committed homosexual partners have a high rate of multiple sexual partners outside their relationship. Don’t expect a civil union or marriage certificate to change this.

Rising insurance rates for married heterosexual couples could easily be on the horizon as the negative health consequences of sexual promiscuity in the homosexual community add to the overall health insurance burden.

Permitting same-sex marriage will help lead to more homosexual adoptions which will almost certainly make children from fractured backgrounds even more confused in their interactions with society.

Frankly, if the Indiana homosexuals are so concerned about divorce, then they should look first at their own ranks. Who among them can be urged to renounce their current lifestyle and reconcile with the opposite-sex spouse they left behind? Let’s see if they have the guts and decency to stop their publicity stunt and do that.


December 18th, 2008

Does this mean being a pro-gay activist will add 22 years to one’s life? Activist math is hard.

L. Junius Brutus

December 18th, 2008

“To commemorate Weyrich’s way of thinking, I’ll make an outlandish claim. Using a sample size of one, and applying Paul Cameron’s methods of analysis, I now declare that being a anti-gay activist will take 11 years off your life.”



December 19th, 2008

Ding dong…the witch is… (oh you know the rest)


December 19th, 2008

I’m reminded of Betty Davis’ (likely apocryphal) quote on the death of Joan Crawford…


December 19th, 2008

You mean: Bette Davis? …Forgive me for being the one with the red pencil and circling that misspelling.


December 19th, 2008

As much as I’d like to keep the concept of not speaking ill of the dead, some one who inflicted Jerry Falwell and the rest of the religious right on us should be punished for something. I’d be willing to imagine a hell for him


December 19th, 2008

Yikes, cowboy, thanks for catching that… You are right, of course.

Robert Robles

December 19th, 2008

Hate is disgusting whether it be from an anti-gay opposing homosexuals, or as it appears in many of the above comments. I would hope that we would not be in the same class as the bigots, but some of these posts aimed at a deceased person, whether agreed with or disagreed with show that many of us are no better than the bigots.


December 19th, 2008

@ Robert Robles,

You confuse hate with disrespect. We did not respect Mr. Weyrich in life, why should we respect him in death?

Don’t shed too many tears. The dead are beyond being hurt. The living…not so much.

People such as Mr. Weyrich have hurt millions of living LGBT citizens. He reaps what he has sown. Trust me, he is not hurt by our disrespect.

If you could convert some of your overwrought sympathy for a dead bigot into a bit of compassion for the living, you might have a bit more credibility.

Robert Robles

December 19th, 2008

Actually, GaySolomon, I am capable of having compassion for both. I don’t find that because I can have compassion for one that it means I cannot have compassion for the rest. Just what makes you think that because some of us have an abundance of compassion for our Gay and Lesbian brothers and sisters, that we can’t also show appropriate respect for someone who has died, even if we disagree completely with their ideology? Sometimes if you have nothing good to say about someone who has died, it is better to say nothing at all. And no, I am not confusing hate with disrespect. That is the kind of argument that bigots and Bible Thumpers could use. “We don’t hate you, we just don’t agree with what you are doing” How many times have I heard that from the hateful far-right? Sorry, GaySolomon, to me you are trying to defend the indefensible.

Timothy Kincaid

December 19th, 2008

I’ve removed some of the comments above for being in violation of our Comments Policy.


December 19th, 2008

I won’t dance on his grave, but I’m certainly not crying over the death of this rabid homophobe. He was a blight upon humanity.

And while I’d previously wished for him to be burning in his own hell, I changed my mind after a Satanist accquaintance told me that the Satanist’s hell involves the person learning the error of their ways through experience. Weyrich would have to be a gay person suffering the pain of homophobia, a pregnant teenager trying to get an abortion while screaming protesters blocked access to the clinic, a transgender woman being physically abused by hatemongers, etc–over and over again until he *got it*. So much more effective than merely burning and being poked with pitchforks IMO.


December 20th, 2008

Paul Weyrich is still dead.


December 22nd, 2008

@ Robert Robles

Not all disrespect is hate. Not all people who disagree with you are just like “bible thumpers” and the “far right”.

Its all very well and good that your personal code of beliefs says that we must say nothing nasty about the dead, but you still give us no reason to follow your code. After all – you have electronically wagged your finger at us all…so now tell us why.

Why do some (or perhaps all) people in death deserve respect, while in life they did very little to earn it?

Weyrich was a bigot. Weyrich hurt all of us. Weyrich is dead. Why should we not rejoice at the fact that the world has one less bigot?

Timothy Kincaid

December 22nd, 2008


As far as I’m concerned comments about Weyrich, alive or dead, will be in compliance with our Comments Policy.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.