Mel White vs. Tony Perkins

Jim Burroway

April 14th, 2009

Soulforce’s Mel White calls out the Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins beginning at the 6:45 mark:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9Duri6NMtQ

cowboy

April 14th, 2009

Rarely do television debates of this sort give an issue a thorough and fair discussion. Not in eight minutes. This is pure TV entertainment and nothing more. This “debate” ended with contention about whose facts are right and that was never resolved in spite of the issue being about the “END OF CHRISTIAN AMERICA?”

Plus, I cannot understand how the FRC think they speak for all Christians.

Thom

April 14th, 2009

Mel White is a saint among us.

Richard W. Fitch

April 14th, 2009

Whenever the Christians conservatives throw out the catch phrase about “the Bible speaks for itself” I start to cringe – painfully. The history of the transmission of the New Testament and the history behind the writing of the Gospels makes evident that if it is true these texts “speak for themselves” then very, very few understand the language. The average church-goer hasn’t the foggiest notion of the culture of the first and second centuries which shaped the original, which was written mainly in Koine Greek (and Aramaic), and then translated over many decades into Latin and then copied by cloistered monks who had only a rudimentary understand of the languages. And then, the version which is most revered by many English-speaking people, was translated from inaccurate manuscripts and skewed by the political ambitions of King James. Also, Mel White is in a unique position to call these anti-gay ‘christians’ at their own game — he knows them from the inside having been a ghost writer for members of that ilk. If these ‘leaders’ wish to wage their battle based on false witness (perjury), then they must also be willing to answer to the Highest Judge.

PGMT

April 14th, 2009

Hi, does anybody know Mel White’s possition on abortion? From this video I imply he is pro-choice, but if he is, does he supports it only as a civil right? or also as a ligitimate moral choice?

I’m interested in this because I’m very pro-gay(if the term “pro-gay” makes any sense at all, considering it is actualy NOT a choice) but also very pro-life.

HappyCat

April 14th, 2009

One would think after the Maggie Gallagher NOM blow-up, the religious right would avoid going on TV while the lies have truly been exposed. But, nope, here they are making fools of themselves some more. After mr. Brown from NOM was MIA on the ED show, I thought they would stay away.

Glad they decided to show up. I just hope they do more.

Regan DuCasse

April 15th, 2009

I have never, EVER liked watching a straight person, or anyone whose life hasn’t involved serious discrimination, lecture someone on what life is supposed to be or has been.

The claim of moral superiority is much easier to do from the position of not having it tested where it counts.

Tony Perkins fails on the simple level of not being or having to deal with living as gay in a heterosexually dominated world.
He is so smug, as if the ‘Bible speaks for itself’ is the end of the discussion.
And there is no need for anyone to speak in challenge to it.

Even if I remind a devout Christian who is anti gay, not only of the most important directive regarding treating another as you’d be treated, but also why it matters and the socio/political context of religious abuse in America towards other groups: they don’t engage that fact.

Perkins is very willing to have gay people be the human sacrifice for his socio/political aspirations, but doesn’t care about the damage the legacy has done already.
He completely chose to deny it even happens. Typical also of many of his ilk.

If a person has decided that a fellow human being is already dead to him, doesn’t exist as a person to learn from, but to dictate to, then Perkins already lost his moral compass and obligation to the second directive of the savior he admires.

I find this arrogance and denial insufferable.
There aren’t even any anti gay people when given the example of their style of conversation on this, I ask them if they are white men, would they argue they know more about racism and sexism than a black woman who has experienced such things over a lifetime.

So how could they lecture gay people so baldly on the facts of living as a gay person?

Since I know many do it anyway, trust me that my experience is also dismissed as someone with a bad attitude and to get over it.

Seems to me, that people like Perkins aren’t invested in getting over their animus towards gay people, regardless of having nothing good to point to for their efforts.

I look at the pictures of those young boys who took their own lives and think of every child like them and wonder how to possibly reach someone like Perkins.

He’d see his own flesh and blood on the street too. No doubt.
We know that happens.
Charity for the poor, not for a gay person’s orientation given by Creation.

But an epiphany about what gay CHILDREN or those suspected of it endure shouldn’t come too late and after they are gone.

Thom

April 15th, 2009

Hi PGMT, I don’t know Mel White’s positions on life issues, but I, too, am curious, as I am gay, but also pro-life (in the true sense of the word).

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.