Analysis of the New York Assembly Vote

Timothy Kincaid

May 13th, 2009

The New York State Assembly passed the marriage equality bill 89 to 52. This is reason for celebration. But a closer look suggests that this victory is particularly sweet.

The Assembly voted for a marriage bill in 2007, as well. But in that vote the count was 85 to 61. And while this year’s vote only has four more “yes” votes, the margin of victory increased from 24 to 37.

Elizabeth Benjamin, who writes for the Daily News with the sort of political analysis that I enjoy reading, provides some detail:

Five members who had voted “no” changed their votes – two Republicans: Fred Thiele and Janet Duprey, bringing the total number of GOP “yes” votes to five; two Democrats: Sandy Galef and Bob Reilly; and one Independence Party member, Tim Gordon).

In addition, there were a number of members who were “excused for other reasons” and some seats changed hands. But the net result shows a healthy increase in support, one which suggests that the brand of political calculus engaged in by politicians shows that supporting marriage equality is a safe position.

[Empire State Pride Agenda Executive Director Alan] Van Capelle predicted the vote would prove to be the “tipping point” that pushes the Senate to follow the Assembly’s lead and muster the 32 votes necessary to pass the bill this year. (O’Donnell made much the same argument to me before the vote started).

Getting Republicans to vote “yes” and Democrats who had voted “no” to change their minds is what will move the Senate “from good to great,” Van Capelle said, adding: “I know now this is the last time this house will have to vote on this bill.”

Lindoro

May 13th, 2009

So what is the next step? With all these “House” and whatever I can never remember who has voted already and how far from the Governor’s desk is the bill.

Timothy Kincaid

May 13th, 2009

Lindoro,

The bill must now go before the Senate. However Malcolm Smith, the Senate Majority leader, will not let the bill be brought up for a vote.

His contention is that unless there is a majority (32 votes) that it would set the community and effort back to have the vote fail. He refuses to reveal his vote count.

However, some suspect that Smith is not concerned about setting back the community so much as he is upholding his end of a bargain with an anti-gay Senator that put him in power.

The Governor, along with grassroots gay activists have been calling for a vote and for putting Senators on record. Some gay political operatives seem to be taking steps designed to avoid a vote in order to keep politicians in power “for the greater good” at the expense of the community.

However, there are murmers that the votes either may be there or may soon be there.

Bruno

May 13th, 2009

Here’s our best public guide so far on where the NY Sens stand: http://www.thealbanyproject.com/diary/6307/senators-positions-on-marriage-equality

Note that in order for the bill to pass as is, 9 more votes would have to move to the “Yes” column. Where would those 9 votes come from? Let’s say they get all 4 Dems that haven’t committed…that leaves 5. 5 from either the firm Dem “no” group (and we know Diaz and Kruger won’t be changing their votes) and/or the 6 uncommitted Republicans. Considering that only 5 GOP in the ASSEMBLY voted “yes,” that’s threading the needle all right.

I’m sorry to say, I just don’t see this happening this year.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.