An Unequal Flag For Unequal Citizens

Jim Burroway

July 6th, 2009

This six star “Flag of Equal Marriage” represents the six states which have marriage equality, by order of their entry into the Union. The stars are arranged according to the order in which each state was admitted to the union, skipping over the states that do not have marriage equality. The six stars represent:

  • Connecticut – #5.
  • Massachusetts – #6.
  • New Hampshire – #9 (Effective Jan 1, 2010)
  • Vermont – #14 (Effective Sep 1, 2009)
  • Maine – #23 (Effective of Sep 14, 2009)
  • Iowa – #29

If this flag had been around in 2008, we would have seen California’ star (#31) go dark. There’s a move on right now to darken Maine’s star in November.

[Hat tip: David Schmader]

Christopher Waldrop

July 6th, 2009

I heard about this flag on the NPR program Studio 360. It was one of several offered up as an “alternative” to the rainbow flag.

I like this design, but, needless to say, I hope in time it will be more filled-in.

Jim Burroway

July 6th, 2009

The beauty of this flag is that whenever it is filled in, it could be argued that there would be no need for a separate rainbow flag.

Cthulhu\'s Quill

July 6th, 2009

Two more and it could be a dipper!


July 6th, 2009

Of course, those of us residents who live in the District of Columbia will be left out of a National Symbol yet again. Ironic considering that there are large chances that we could become that 7th star on the flag in the next few days.

Equal marriage recognition from other jurisdictions is set to become law tomorrow (July 7, 2009). It’s pretty much a test case for introducing full gay and lesbian marriage rights by the City Council later this fall.

Go figure.

Rebecca Juro

July 7th, 2009

Interesting how you count Mass. and NH as deserving of stars for having marriage rights even though neither state has any legal protections for its transgender citizens.

I frankly find your qualifications to be considered worthy of a star on your flag to be at best flawed and at worst outright discriminatory.

As the kids say, Epic Fail.


July 7th, 2009

It’s the marriage equality flag, not the trans rights flag. Though I’d like to see one of those, too.

Jason D

July 7th, 2009

Rebecca you appear to have skipped over the first sentence of the post, here it is again(bold is mine):

“This six star “Flag of Equal Marriage” represents the six states which have marriage equality, by order of their entry into the Union.”

As the kids say: EPIC READING FAIL.

Emily K

July 7th, 2009

Obvious flame war is obvious, as we say.

I understand where Rebecca is coming from. The contest was for a new LGB*T* flag. And this one only represents gays. It’s a wonderful flag. It’s a great symbol and I’d like to see it adopted.

But I don’t agree that it could truly replace the rainbow flag, as it only covers a single issue in the gay community.

Jason D

July 7th, 2009

Just to clarify, the flag’s home page is here:

As you can see, it’s based on a suffragette protest flag. They do not mention the contest. Their facebook page only mentions it was chosen for the contest.

By way of context, it appears, at least, that the flag was designed first and then the contest came along later and they decided to enter. Or at least the flag does not appear to be designed specifically for the contest. So no one designed this flag to intentionally forget the transgender folk. It appears this flag was created for a specific issue, much like the white knot or the red ribbon.

You do have a point, however, that as a replacement for the rainbow flag, it’s underqualified as marriage equality isn’t the only LGBT issue. I agree. But that’s not what the article here, or the original flag’s creator is saying. It’s what the contest is saying.

Rebecca seems to have missed the point that the flag wasn’t designed to address the LGBT community at large. She seems to have missed what the flag was created for, and conflating the purpose of the contest with the motivation for the flag creation.

Of course, it doesn’t help that studio360 seems to either have two contests running, or has decided to call this contest both the”Gay Flag Design Challenge” and something called the “Listener Design Challenge” so it’s difficult to tell what’s going on.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.