July 13th, 2009
Jason Bellini is reporting: (Daily Beast)
New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is considering bringing the battle over “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” to the Senate this week, by introducing an amendment that would put an 18-month moratorium on the discharge of gays serving in the military
While I favor a full reversal of all institutionalized discrimination against gay citizens and taxpayers, such a process may not be a bad idea. It would allow the administration to demonstrate that removing anti-gay policies did not result in chaos or in loss of troop morale.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Ben in Oakland
July 13th, 2009
but…but…but…
they’ll see me naked for 18 months. How can I possibly function, what with the morale of my unit rising in the showers?
Waaaaaaah.
Wait, that isn’t what i meant to say. How can i possibly function if i know there’s a ‘mo in my unit, as opposed to merely guessing.
Waaaaah.
Boo
July 13th, 2009
So what happens at the end of the 18 months, when everyone who’s out gets kicked out?
Burr
July 13th, 2009
I don’t understand how this would be more likely to pass than a full reversal. Assuming that is the reasoning for it.. Or is just a matter that it would be faster to do?
Posta0
July 13th, 2009
I agree with Boo, the first thing i thought of when i read this as what happens at the end of the 18 months if DADT isn’t fully repealed.
Matt
July 13th, 2009
Looks like an interesting tack to take. By the way, here’s a full list of countries that allow GLBT soldiers to serve openly (source: 365gay.com):
Australia
Austria
Belgium (Nato member)
Britain (Nato member)
Canada (Nato member)
Czech Republic (Nato member)
Denmark (Nato member)
Estonia (Nato member)
Finland
France (Nato member)
Germany (Nato member)
Ireland (Nato member)
Israel
Italy (Nato member)
Lithuania (Nato member)
Luxembourg (Nato member)
Netherlands (Nato member)
New Zealand
Norway (Nato member)
Slovenia (Nato member)
South Africa
Spain (Nato member)
Sweden
Switzerland
Uruguay
This is the point that needs to driven home when this is being debated that I am very frustrated to rarely hear mentioned by people. If 14 members of NATO (50% of the group’s membership) can let their GLBT soldiers serve openly, why not us? If ISRAEL, a country that contends with terrorist attacks on a near-daily basis, can let its GLBT soldiers serve openly, why not us?
Gina9223
July 13th, 2009
I second Matt, I’ve sailed with most of our NATO allies.
Its really frustrating to see how our Freedom is slighted when compared to our allies.
*sigh* I just so frustrated over the whole thing..and I’m glad I’m done and gone from it all.
libhomo
July 15th, 2009
I share concerns that a moratorium means that queers in the military will be used as canon fodder for a while and then kicked out when the military doesn’t desperately need people.
Leave A Comment