Texas Judge Challenges Marriage Ban

Timothy Kincaid

October 2nd, 2009

From the Dallas News:

Dallas state District Judge Tena Callahan ruled that two men married out of state could divorce in Texas. She also stated that the Texas marriage ban violates the US Constitution.

Although the case is far from settled, and the state’s constitutional ban on gay marriage is a long way from being thrown out, Dallas state District Judge Tena Callahan’s ruling says the state prohibition of same-sex marriage violates the federal constitutional right to equal protection.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott had intervened in the two men’s divorce case, arguing that because a gay marriage isn’t recognized in Texas, a Texas court can’t dissolve one through divorce.

Callahan, a Democrat, denied the attorney general’s intervention and said her court “has jurisdiction to hear a suit for divorce filed by persons legally married in another jurisdiction.”

The political establishment in Texas will whip itself into a froth making sure that Callahan is reversed and gay people can return to being second class citizens, just as the Texas voters like it.

Lindoro Almaviva

October 2nd, 2009

They can reverse Callahan, but a good lawyer and someone with the time could take this to the District court of appeals and we’ll see what happens.

Lynn David

October 2nd, 2009

She will likely be voted out in 2010 also.


October 2nd, 2009

Anything that annoys the bigots of Texas is fine with me! I hope they collectively bust a blood vessel. Good for Judge Callahan.


October 2nd, 2009

Umm yeah. I wouldn’t expect anything enlightened coming from Texas.


October 2nd, 2009

Good for Judge Callahan.

Believe it or not, there are those of us in Texas who are not a part of the “political establishment,” and who not only disagree with the “bigots,” but actively work toward LGBT rights.

Bigots are found everywhere. So are enlightened people. Seems like Judge Callahan is one of the latter. Thanks to her.


October 2nd, 2009

Seems to me that Judge Callahan is legislating from the bench!

Thank you Judge Callahan for standing up. Force members of the legislature in Texas and likely the US Supreme Court to come clean and either support civil rights or acknowledge that we have, by law and action, created American apartheid.

Big hug to the rest of the Texans fighting for our rights. Keep the pressure on, any movement anywhere helps us in California.


October 2nd, 2009

Dennis, hug returned :). We all need all the help we can get.


October 2nd, 2009

The irony in the attorney general’s actions: the couple is being forced to stay married.

Perhaps he should intervene in other divorce cases and try to lower the divorce rate. That would be a more logical way to protect marriage.

Oh… yeah… sorry… logic isn’t usually part of the equation. Is it?


October 2nd, 2009

Irony is definitely a big part of the whole situation. The point you make, Keith, is one I’ve heard a number of people from the LGBT community in Texas making.

It’s the real people in real life situations who are caught in the middle of “defense of marriage” arguments and “one man, one woman” definitions. Attorney General Abbot’s actions are just another attempt to enforce “less than” status on some of people he’s suppose to be serving.


October 2nd, 2009

Could someone explain to me why these “divorce in another state” cases keep being brought up? Wouldn’t it just be easier to go back to the state where it is law?

Don’t get me wrong it’s great that these things are going to court to emphasize how ridiculous the non-portability of some marriages is..

But I’m wondering if this is purely an activist move, or if there’s some straightforward reason behind these suits.

Just curious, not critical.


October 2nd, 2009

Joyce I’ve got a big hug for both of you as well, We Progressive Texans have to stick together.

On the court case I’m not sure what I think will happen, I’m trying to stay positive.

Timothy Kincaid

October 2nd, 2009


Many states have lower residency requirements for marriage than they do for divorce. This results in a couple easily marrying in Massachusetts on a visit but finding that to divorce they have to move there.

It’s a holdover from the days in which only a few states offered divorce.


October 2nd, 2009

Ah that makes a lot more sense then. Well the laws themselves don’t make any damn sense, but still..

Just shows how utterly myopic and counter intuitive marriage/divorce law in this country is as a whole..


October 2nd, 2009

Hey Piper, thanks. I keep hearing that Texas is turning purple. We can hope. And keep working at it.

And I’m just hoping something positive comes out of this current situation, too.


October 2nd, 2009

Yeah, I’ve heard that, but it’s hard to believe it, living in ranching country up here. Right now it’s mostly grassroots work.


October 3rd, 2009

Piper, I’m in a very rural part of central TX. Grassroots is definitely the way change is / will happen. Actions like those by Callahan can help with that. Among other things, it can offer a bit of encouragement to progressives / liberals who keep on doing the work.


October 4th, 2009

And the Texas voters like Annise Parker so much that she has been Houston’s controller for 6 terms. And is now a contender for mayor.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.