Bill James’ lastest unusual statement

Timothy Kincaid

December 18th, 2009

Bill James is the Mecklenburg County Commissioner who slurred the dead gay son of a fellow commissioner. In a follow up communication, James declared that North Caroline flaunts the US Supreme Court and refers to gay men “infesting” areas. From Q-Notes.

James wrote: “Homosexual conduct is illegal in NC (even after Lawrence V Texas). We arrest 250 homosexuals each year in Mecklenburg alone for either a ‘crime against nature\’ or ‘solicitation of a crime against nature\’. Unlike prostitution (exchanging money), even suggesting homosexual sex is a criminal offense in NC. If we were all that ‘progressive\’ would we be arresting 250 homosexuals a year? Setting up sting operations to de-infest areas where they congregate? Point is, if you want to delude yourself that homosexual conduct is ‘ok\’ go ahead. The law, the police and the DA however have a different view.”

I have inquired with Peter Gilchrist, the Mecklenburg District Attorney, and Ken Miller, Deputy Chief of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, as to whether their departments agree with Mr. Jones.


December 18th, 2009

If he is referring to sexual acts performed in public spaces, that’s one thing. Yet if he is saying that NC is violating the Lawrence decision, I need to get myself down there quick! Why the millions I’d make in damages would be more than enough to retire on!


December 18th, 2009

Mecklenburg County needs to be de-infested of d–chebags.


December 18th, 2009

Atleast he’s honest about wanting to arrest gay people because he hates them. He doesn’t make up some BS about ‘public intoxication’ like Forth Worth did.


December 18th, 2009

Uhhhhh…“Homosexual conduct is illegal in NC (even after Lawrence V Texas).” WTF?!

Maybe I’m missing something, but isn’t that like saying “Interracial marriage is illegal here (even after Loving v. Virginia)”? The U.S. SUPREME COURT ruled those laws unconstitutional. When the U.S. Supreme Court says something is unconstitutional, states don’t get to just ignore that if they don’t like it.

Perhaps Bill James slept through all his civics classes.

Lynn David

December 19th, 2009

Mr. James is obviously ignorant. There were a few articles on problems in Mecklinburg parks about cruising. Here is one, Cruising for Trouble:

Cruisers don’t seem out of place because they often look like they belong in these places. They’re often older men who have none of the mannerisms of gay culture that homosexual men often adopt. They drive family type vehicles, because many of them are married. They don’t go to gay bars because they’re afraid someone they know might find out about it.

Alan Rosenberg, President of the Gay and Lesbian Switchboard of Charlotte, counsels a group of men struggling with their homosexuality. Like so many men in their position, he began cruising for sex with other men while still trapped in a marriage to his wife of 25 years.

And also here, Naming Names:

On April 21, six detectives had set up a sting operation to target gay men who cruise some areas of Freedom Park looking for sex with other anonymous gay men. As a result of the sting, six men ranging in age between 23 and 80 were arrested on soliciting for crime against nature and public masturbation charges, both of which are misdemeanors.

Offenders arrested on misdemeanor charges rarely make the department’s e-mail release list unless they are wanted for questioning in a bigger, more violent crime. But on May 3, the names, birthdates and addresses of the six men were released by CMPD.

Because men who cruise parks looking for gay sex are often not out of the closet, and in many cases are married with a family, the move had the potential to ruin the men’s lives, say some members of the gay community.

I’d almost bet Jim blogged about it back then.


December 19th, 2009

Have you had a response from the district attorney or the police department? I’m guessing they’ll say Bill James is off his rocker

Timothy Kincaid

December 19th, 2009


Not yet. Nor have I seen any MSM coverage of his latest comments.

Jerry Sloan

December 19th, 2009


It may come as a shock to you but it is illegal in California to solicit homosexual sex.

While the legislature in 1974 passed Willie Brown’s consenting adult bill, AB 489 they did not change the soliciting laws.

If you were to ask an undercover cop to have sex it is illegal to do so even if you proposed to go to your home to have wild sex – no money has to be involved.

The law applies equally to both heterosexual and homosexual persons.

So the bottom line is, in Califoria it is legal to do it – just don’t ask to do it. :-)

Timothy Kincaid

December 19th, 2009


If you mean that it is illegal to solicit sex for money, i.e. prostitution, that is not at all surprising.

If, however, you are stating that it is illegal to ask someone to have sex with you, I have to ask that you provide a link to the code section.

Regan DuCasse

December 19th, 2009

There was a double shooting of a couple in front of a Valley hospital a few days ago. Gang related.
Indeed, a lot of domestic or gang related violence has taken many lives just in the last year.

I haven’t seen the comparable statistics on what happens in NC yet. But I’m sure that drug and alcohol related problems are many.
To say nothing of poverty, and neglect of children in that state certainly are.

For this man to refer to gay people as an ‘infestation’ on any level reminds me of the offense he takes that gay people exist, and the pernicious perception that they cause a lot of problems in any given neighborhood they live in.

I defy ANY law enforcement professional to be honest about what really poses a threat to innocents in our country.
Even what poses a specific NUISANCE that’s real and I doubt any of them could say it’s gay people.
And certainly not beyond or out of proportion to what hetero people do.

But one thing gay people DON’T do, and HAVEN’T done, is form into organized criminal gangs that outnumber and outgun law enforcement agencies.
There is no tradition of shooting up neighborhoods in which children are gunned down on a basis similar to war zones in the Middle East and Africa.
Nor do gay people RECRUIT children into street gangs.

I see a conspiracy to claim that gay people might as well be gang members and violent organized entities in neighborhoods to hear the conservative or religious right tell it.

If their obsession weren’t so dangerously ONE track and utterly without merit or substance, I’d laugh at their folly.

But for every crime scene, or incident recorded where I have to work, few involved gay people who were PERPETRATORS.
VERY few.

I’m not saying intra sexual orientation crimes don’t exist.
But the ones that are the most violent, and chronic…the gay community isn’t responsible.
And for a city the size of Los Angeles, where there is a concentration of gay folks, that’s saying something.

And believe me, I’m not one or blind sided about this. It’s a fact.

So, this particular political official is the sort of person I’d LOVE to school about a few things.

Tim, thanks for breaking it down about solicitation regarding a monetary transaction and sex.
THAT is illegal.

But picking up someone because of mutual attraction isn’t.

Another thing I’d like to point out, that’s been impossible on another site to educate folks on.
The chronic MYTH that gay people (i.e. gay men) are overrepresented in sex crimes against children or conviction rates for it.

I had to do some research for a project and I did some cross checking through the INNOCENCE Project and other organizations.

What the anti gay FAIL to mention whenever they start talking about crime stats and information is that same sex sex crimes are not or cannot be attributed to homosexuality.
Men who rape boys, are not identified as GAY, but simply as male on male assault.
And of those young boys who were assaulted, their attacker did so out of the perception that the boy was weak or gay.
Any sex crime expert will tell us that aim is to control, humiliate and hurt the target, it’s NOT attraction.
It’s not ORIENTATION that makes a person a rapist. And sex assault is about the most vulnerable target and in any given social situation where the target is isolated, politically and socially weak and vulnerable as well, they are the most preyed on.
And gay children, or those perceived as gay ARE the most preyed on. And gay adult women are the most preyed on as well.

In fact, as you’re all witness to, female victims of priest abuse are barely a part of the conversation. And gay males being considered legitimate to ban from the priesthood as if that would solved the problem of any kind of sexual abuse.
Indeed, abuse from the priesthood is reflective of the similar reasons it happens outside of the church for the same reasons stated before: hetero priests would abuse a boy because the boy was vulnerable, not because the priest was homosexual.

Anyway, I always do some homework before I say something.
And this post is not my opinion, but a matter of criminal statistical facts.

Political figures like this would do a great deal more good by addressing the most persistent and threatening factors in their constituent’s lives, rather than pointing fingers at gay people as the element of most interest that does.

He’s no help to anyone committed to fighting crime, and he’s not influencing the public to be more informed of reality, than just having their bigotry increased and validated.

He deserved to be smacked by that fellow commissioner the way he talked about her son.
People like him have NO idea and never appreciate just how much restraint and patience is required to deal with him and his ilk.

Thanks for letting me vent. The people who need to hear this never want to, but it’s good how respectful you are in comparison.

paul j stein

December 19th, 2009

While I don’t agree with Mr James opinion I can say with some personal experience on the subject that the Interstate 77 rest area in Charlotte is/was very popular with gay men. By the time you got your hand on your zipper to get your fly open , “BANG” center stage. I felt like selling tickets and doing private shows for road money to finish my trip to Florida. A recent remodel will help to clear up that whole issue I’m sure.

Timothy Kincaid

December 19th, 2009


Thanks, as always, for your passion and your ability to slice right through the BS.

Jason D

December 19th, 2009

Regan, Bravo!


December 20th, 2009

The section of the California Penal Code is 647(a) “Lewd Conduct in Public.” It requires you to conduct sexual acts (include touching yourself). California also as a requirement that a the accused knew or reasonably should have known that someone who might have been offended by the conduct was present.

You can also be arrested in CA for soliciting lewd conduct in public, and in this case it does not mean prostitution, but simply requesting a person do preform lewd conduct.

I believe that the NC law is similar.

These are the same types of crimes that Sen. Larry Craig and FL Rep. Bob Allen got charged with.


December 20th, 2009

So why is he still in office? Let’s target him and expose him. Let’s make his life miserable as we should to every right wing nut job. We are too complacent as a people (I dislike the term community, it is too dismissive), and do not respond in force to these very dangerous zeolots who would really like to see gay people dead without any remorse. Where is HRC to get this asswipe removed? Too busy throwing expensive fundraisers I guess and letting these douchebags get away with comments like this. Don’t forget, many ignorants will follow him.


December 20th, 2009

The NC police use an anachronistic “Crimes against nature” statute in order to arrest people, purely for harassment in order to humiliate and embarass gay men in their communities. It is an insidious method of legally harassing LGBT people and causing them psychological abuse such that they will leave the state. After arrest, they can hold you for 24 hours, but they know that they must release you because they cannot make the charges stick because of the Lawrence decision. THEY HATE US IN N.C. and do not want us there.


December 20th, 2009

Having grown up in the NW piedmont of SC and having made numerous trips to NC in my youth, I see that ignorance is still praised in SC & NC.

Timothy Kincaid

December 21st, 2009


Thanks for the code section.

Every person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor:
(a) Who solicits anyone to engage in or who engages in lewd or dissolute conduct in any public place or in any place open to the public or exposed to public view.


I believe that this only bans solicitation of sexual acts in public. In other words, you can ask an undercover cop to come home with you to have sex. You just can’t ask him to do it in the park.

Jason D

December 21st, 2009

Timothy, the sentence suggests it might also be illegal to ask in public as well. Though I’m no scholar or english professor, I can see how the sentence can be broken down in such a way to suggest that asking in public is forbidden as well.

It’s a bit like that part in the movie “Clue”

-He threatened to kill me in public!
-Why would he want to kill you in public?
-I think she means he threatened, in public, to kill her.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.