Limbaugh confirms support for civil unions

Timothy Kincaid

July 29th, 2010

Rush Limbaugh made a comment on his radio show that seems to confirm earlier reports that he supports civil unions. Of course he did it in the nastiest way possible. (On Top Magazine)

Before playing a clip from ABC’s The View, where former Fox News anchor E.D. Hill (refereed to as the “infobabe” by Limbaugh) is heard saying that John is “all about the money,” Limbaugh says that he and John share similar views on gay marriage.

“Elton John is not married to David Furnish, and Elton John is not a supporter of gay marriage,” Limbaugh tells his audience. “Elton John is on the same page as I am, as is Obama on gay marriage. He’s for civil unions, but he’s not for marriage.”

“Of course it had to be mentioned in the story that Elton John played my wedding reception … even though I am ‘vehemently anti-gay marriage and Elton John is married,'” he said, then added, “He’s not.”

Limbaugh is no fool. He knows exactly what his audience wants to hear.

So it would seem that Rush Limbaugh believes that his very conservative audience has moved beyond the position of “no recognition at all” and now favors recognition of same-sex couples, provided that they are lesser in status.


July 29th, 2010

This isn’t a new position. Limbaugh has been stating this for years. I’m surprised this is a new revelation.

Of course he, Elton John, and Obama are still in the wrong.

Lindoro Almaviva

July 29th, 2010

And that is precisely the reason why neither his voice, nor Elton’s are heard in my house.

Scott P.

July 29th, 2010

Elton John isn’t married, but then, the U.K. doesn’t provide for same-sex marriage, so Rushbo’s point is moot. If full marriage equality was available to John, and he preferred to remain in a civil union, THEN, and only then would The Fat One’s argument be valid.

Personally, I’ve never cared for John’s music, so his opinion on ANYTHING is meaningless to me. He’s the biggest media-whore I’ve ever seen.

Emily K

July 29th, 2010

To paraphrase a South Park quote,


Ben in Oakland

July 29th, 2010

I’m perfecty happy for rush’s support, and I want to thank him for it. One more of the props underneath anti-gay animus going down rapidly. I’ll take what I can get.

At the same time, Faux News and rush limbaugh–feh.


July 29th, 2010

This is why Elton John’s position is so infuriating. He gives gas bags like Limbaugh carte blanche to claim that it’s OK for him to be against civil equality for gays because a gay person is also against it.

If I remember correctly Elton John used to claim he was straight, and then bisexual. Limbaugh better hold off on pointing to John. His position on just about anything seems to be a moving target.


July 29th, 2010

This is a very cynical ploy on Limbaugh’s part. He knows that his Right-Wing have lost the issue, so he is positioning himself to amplify the remaining vestige of anti-gay positioning. Many people have forgotten that around 1989-91 he did a stage show called ‘The Rush to Excellence Tour’. During those performances (I attended the one at Arco Arena), he riled up the crowd into some of the most vicious homophobic hate I have ever seen – playing various skits about Barney Frank (‘My Boy Lolipop’) and mocking people with AIDS (‘You’ll Never Love This Way Again’). The crowd would whoop an holler with a murderous zeal at the ‘faggots’ that Limbaugh so despises. During that period, he also had an ongoing war with GLAAD, constantly saying “Flag the tape, flag the tape” and then making digs at them.


July 29th, 2010

My understanding of Elton’s position is that he is not “against” gay marriage, he simply thinks Civil Unions are an acceptable compromise. But when you choose to lie down with dogs, you’re getting covered with fleas. Elton’s legacy will forever be tarnished by his choice to associate with Rush. Hope the money was worth it.


July 30th, 2010

I see this as a good thing…there’s a reason they call them dittoheads, my friends, and that’s because they parrot anything this guy says. Either he’s more liberal on social issues than he lets on, or he’s realized conservatives have lost on the issue and so he’s compromising without making it look that way. My dad is always listening to Rush and so I have to sit through it at times. The guy is not stupid by any stretch of the imagination. He’s actually quite brilliant and a master of right-wing spin and so if he’s saying it, his followers will likely follow suit.


August 1st, 2010

Either he’s more liberal on social issues than he lets on, or he’s realized conservatives have lost on the issue and so he’s compromising without making it look that way.

Or, he doesn’t actually have strong beliefs- he just recognizes which side has the advantages (with some initial bias) and those appeal to him far more than any of the substance.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.