September 28th, 2010
Carly Fiorina must be loco. Muy loco.
Why else would she agree to let the National Organization for Marriage organize a bus tour to support her campaign for US Senator from California. In Spanish.
Over the summer, NOM spent 19 days traveling about various states to promote their agenda of excluding gay people from civil marriage rights. And although they only made 21 stops, they were so abysmally disorganized that in some events the organizers outnumbered the attendees. They seemed to have the strange approach to bus tours of “if you park it, they will come.”
Now consider, if you will, the same organizers (along with the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, American Principles in Action and the Susan B. Anthony List). Except this time the tour will have several stops per day, will target Latinos to support of a Republican Senate candidate, and will be in Spanish.
Yesterday, the “Vota Tus Valores” campaign (“Vote your Values”) rolled is off to a start. And it is laughably predictable. (Courage Campaign)
Stop 1: Bakersfield
Only one “values-voter” stopped by, but she was not Latina.
“I was shopping at Target when I saw the bus across the street and wanted to see what it was all about,” she told me.
We initially counted 8 in attendance, but 7 were organizers that got back on the bus at the end of the stop.
Stop 2: Visalia
The Vota Tus Valores bus tour kept up its attendance average in Visalia — 1 person showed up.
“I vote according to God’s will,” said one Latina woman who happened to be in the park when the bus pulled up but refused to go on-camera.
Stop 3: Hanford
No one at all. Zilch. Nada.
Maybe it shouldn’t be surprising that on the hottest day of the year (Los Angeles set a new record: the hottest day ever recorded in the city) you aren’t going to find too many people hanging out in a nice bright sunny park. But surely you could have tried to organize someone.
Stop 4: Madera
Success. At last an audience. Not of likely voters, exactly, but at least living breathing bodies.
In Madera, the advance team was able to wrangle up a few additional attendees: fifteen men from a local Christian men’s shelter were present to “show support,” including one man wearing an Obama shirt and a reformed neo-Nazi who was heavily tatotted with swastikas.
Stop 5: Roseville
Here the bus pulled up for dinner. At a chain “mexican” restaurant. Even the waiter wasn’t Latino.
And that, my friends, is what you get when NOM organizes your bus tour. Thank God.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Gus
September 28th, 2010
O…M…G!
beachewtoy75
September 28th, 2010
Ok… this just isn’t funny anymore…
beachewtoy75
September 28th, 2010
I’m actually embarrassed for them. And you KNOW those coverings cant’ be cheap!
TampaZeke
September 28th, 2010
The more ways they find to waste their money the better.
Titus
September 28th, 2010
NOMfail
David C.
September 28th, 2010
Almost certainly NOM doesn’t really expect to have much in the way of attendance at these “stops”. I suspect that this is just a way of making some kind of appearance that they are a grassroots religious organization, most likely for tax purposes, trying to disguise the fact they are really only funded by a few very wealthy religious donors. I believe that NOM is most likely a very carefully crafted fraud on some level. Their lack of transparency really shows, they fight disclosure laws, and generally abuse the system. I believe they are crooks and should be investigated by the IRS, FBI, and DoJ, not to mention AG’s in every state where they have had some kind of presence. One can learn a lot more about NOM here.
Richard Rush
September 28th, 2010
“Vota Tus Valores†(“Vote your Valuesâ€)
In today’s environment “values” is usually bigotry with a respectable veneer slapped on. Maybe, to make things honest, we need a new word such as “vigotry” defined as bigotry hiding behind a veneer of values.
Lucrece
September 28th, 2010
They would’ve been more successful had they asked for a collaboration with the Catholic archdiocese. Church is something most Latinos don’t miss, particularly housewives.
Alas, they seem to be at a strategic rut.
anteros
September 28th, 2010
lol! one would think that it wouldn’t take this kind of failure for any fool to realize the futility of such a campaign… something tells me they’re not done embarrassing themselves. thanks for the laugh:)
truthteller
September 28th, 2010
This is hysterical, but I will not give them any pointers as to how be successful promoting to the Latino Communities. I’ve spearheaded multiple successful campaigns to those demographics.
Amateurs!
ebohlman
September 29th, 2010
I’m starting to think that NOM isn’t really about marriage at all; that their main purpose is to engage in litigation challenging campaign-finance laws, and the whole marriage stuff is just a decoy. I would be completely unsurprised if it turned out they had a lot of Koch brothers financing behind them.
Leave A Comment