Why Fox didn’t run first-person gay soldier stories

Timothy Kincaid

December 20th, 2010

Fox News runs a lot of military stories. Their pro-military reporting has made them a welcome sight on bases around the world and they often have access that is not as ready (or perhaps even as desired) by other news outlets.

One thing they also had over the past year was a steady stream of gay soldiers wanting to tell their story. But they did not choose to tell that story. Embedded reporter Dominic Di-Natale tells us why.

Oddly, it wasn’t resistance on the part of network execs. Nor was it hostility to the political efforts to lift the ban. Rather, according to Di-Natale, it was a matter of logistics and timing. The entire article is an interesting read and suggests to me that implementation may be less difficult than the handful of elderly retired veterans would have us believe.

(The Gay Soldiers that Wanted to be on Fox)

Truth is it’s a new layer of resilience both sides are now obliged to acquire. Straight soldiers will need to assimilate. And gay soldiers will need thicker skins, too, because as open as they will now be allowed, frank, confrontational responses will come from those with firm convictions against them.

But if each serviceman and woman remembers, as they must, it’s mission first, soldier second, I believe over time the military will be better balanced and, yes, stronger.


December 20th, 2010

“The entire article is an interesting read”

The only thing really interesting is your willingness to accept it.


December 20th, 2010

When repeal passed, the Fox article online opened with declaring that it was a victory for “Obama, liberals, and the gay community”. I think that sort of speaks for itself. And the comments on that article were indistinguishable from those on Free Republic. I think Fox knows its audience and that this reporter’s reasons seem pretty implausible.


December 20th, 2010

This is ridiculous.


December 20th, 2010

Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Then he outed their online community and worried about how military chaplains would feel. (rolling eyes)



December 20th, 2010

I’d agree, I’m pretty skeptical about the claim that it was a matter of timing, not agenda or politics. Ryan, I noticed the FOX attribution to “Obama, liberals, and the gay community” too … of course they can’t say this is a win for the military or for America.

But I think the observation Timothy brought up in his final paragraph is an interesting one: that apparently in many segments of the military, gay soldiers are already living and working openly, and it hasn’t caused a breakdown of unit cohesion in daily operations. Of course, many of us figured that and the military study supports it, but even a FOX News reporter has to acknowledge it as well.


December 20th, 2010

After all the jingoism and outright lies Fox indulged in to get the war started– knowing that they would get people killed for bullsh!t– there is no way they could reasonably be considered “pro-military” by any stretch of anyone’s imagination.

Pro-nationalism, yes. Pro-war, pro-Defense-Department, certainly. I’d even grant pro-militarism.

But not pro-military.


December 21st, 2010

wow! a few of you posters here really need to get off your ego and pitty pot and actually read the article.

I am no fan of Faux News and I have no conscious knowledge that I have ever heard or read a report from Di Natale before this.

that said, stories and interviews of gay soldiers in country in Iraq or Afghanistan are few and far between. Reporters (and editors) have made a conscious effort not to out or highlight gay service members.

Taking care that units and locals are in no way indicative of where those in the few interviews that were given.

That Di Natale got the approval at a time when it was impractical at best to do the story in no way discredits him or casts him as anything but doing his job.

I am a retired Navy Chief and have served all over the world, in all theaters and under all conditions that face military members, in war or at peace. I can say with some authority that the restraint by Faux News powers-that-be and reporters on the ground in NOT reporting on gay soldiers or outing them, must have been tremendous on their part.

Faux News operates by keeping the fringe agitated. The more distractions they can create, and mud they can splatter on others, keeps their base in a tizzy and angry about everything. That anger and confusion is enough to keep more moderate right wing people paying attention to if not wholly buying in to the hate mongering.

Outing gay soldiers on the battlefield would be like raw meat to a junkyard cur, but they showed restraint and I believe a tacit understanding that outing gay soldiers in combat would backfire on them in a massive way.

The more moderate righties would have freaked and fled from their station. Notice that 80% of the U.S. population believes the repeal is a good thing. That includes right wingers.

So guys, read the story and stop creating drama and distraction where it doesn’t exist. Faux News and the Republicans do it so often that your help is unneeded and unwanted.


December 21st, 2010

“Rather, according to Di-Natale, it was a matter of logistics and timing.”

Where there’s a will, there’s a way, with no will there will be excuses.

I have seen other news media doing reporting on and with gay military service members and their everyday struggle with DADT, apparently other news media finds a way since they have the will.

Priya Lynn

December 21st, 2010

Mikenola, faux is pronounced “fo”, not “fox”.

John in the Bay Area

December 21st, 2010

I continue to find it amazing that this foreign owned and controlled media outlet (FOX) has been able to so easily take over and dominate conservative politics in America.

MIhangel apYrs

December 22nd, 2010

Priya Lynn
as you know “faux” is French for “false”, and the spelling of it works when read, if not spoken. A reasonable pun

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.