Why it’s never smart for a politician to whine about how badly he’s treated

Timothy Kincaid

July 27th, 2011

If you don’t want people to say mean things about you, don’t go into politics (or blogging). And when they do (and they will) it is never smart to whine about the mean mean meanies who are so mean to you. Not only will you gain no sympathy or new support, but then everyone will be repeating all those mean things and chuckling.

But former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed. And he had been the subject of a cruel (but well deserved) prank for a very long time.

After Santorum’s vile statement in 2003 in which he discussed his support for anti-gay sodomy laws in terms of bestiality and incest, Dan Savage decided to have a little fun. He held a contest for a new definition for “santorum” and the winner was:

    The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the by-product of anal sex.

A Spreading Santorum webpage was set up for tracking the extent to which the new definition could be detected in culture and it was clever enough that it drew web traffic placing it as the first listing when “santorum” was googled. And so there it sat as the first result through the rest of Rick Santorum’s term as Senator and his failed reelection bid.

But with his presidential campaign, there was a pretty good chance that eventually “Rick Santorum for President” along with news articles about the campaign would have gotten the traffic necessary to push the aging joke off of the front page. And it likely would have, were it not for the actions of two people.

First, Savage encouraged his readers to go back and select the link to keep it active in the Google search matrices. Enough responded to keep Savage’s santorum link in place ahead of the candidate’s page. In fact, the campaign site was fourth, after a Wikipedia article and another site’s reference to Savage’s definition.

But the real boost to Spreading Santorum came from none other than Rick Santorum himself. On July 18 he went on a radio show to complain about the way he was being mistreated by Savage and in addition to some recent comments also noted the website. And then someone with a whole lot of hero worship and no political sense must have advised the next move: Santorum sent out a fund raising letter with the following sentence:

Remember this is not the first time Savage has attacked us on our stance of supporting American values. Savage and his perverted sense of humor is the reason why my children cannot Google their father’s name.

And when this letter was published on Politico on July 20, which turned into articles in the media, just what do you suppose that people did? Obviously they set out to find out why you couldn’t google “Santorum”.

But July 22, the presidential campaign link had dropped to eighth place behind:

The campaign site has now moved back up into sixth place. But Savage is goading Rick Santorum, threatening to make his first name into a vulgar word as well. I guess now we’ll have to wait and see if Sen. Santorum is so very incredibly stupid that he bites at the bait.


July 27th, 2011

Honestly stated, I wondered where the phrase “Frothy Mix” came from, and now I know. OMG! Way to go Savage!!!

As I don’t believe Santorum can avoid putting his foot in his mouth – after all he IS a politician – it may be sooner than we think when he messes up worse than he already has.

Now, where IS that clown car?


July 27th, 2011

I love karma.


July 27th, 2011

Santorum is definitely not presidential material, by either definition.


July 27th, 2011

With that kind of fund-raising prowress, it is so surprising that he couldn’t clear $600K last quarter – not!.

Timothy Kincaid

July 27th, 2011


You might say that Santorum’s karma ran over his dogma

Richard Rush

July 27th, 2011

I’m apparently the only one who feels this way:

I like Dan Savage, but I loath his definition of Santorum, and the website devoted to it. I think it actually aids our opponent’s efforts to keep people focused exclusively on sexual mechanics, and not on the human affection and love. I had wished it would stop long ago, and that the website would be removed – but now it can’t be removed because it would look like caving in to pressure.

I think Dan Savage has a good mind, and usually has helpful insightful things to say. But “Santorum” was not one of them, in my opinion.

Edgar Manhattan

July 27th, 2011

Santorum’s description is slipping a little on Google Search – the politician must be paying people to change it’s ranking, or organizing religious bigots to change it’s ranking.

Some of us think it’s a brilliant way to keep Mr. Santorum’s bigotry out where the general public can’t miss it. It’s not the definition, but the discussion about the definition, that’s important.

If you agree – Click here to help restore it to it’s rightful place!


July 28th, 2011

This was Rick’s Hail Mary pass basically, to keep his name in the papers and exploit the victim card that conservatives love so much. Unfortunately for Rick, conservatives don’t much like him either, so it’s not really working. But I don’t really think his idea was “dumb”, per se, just unsuccessful.

Timothy (TRiG)

July 28th, 2011


Clicking on links doesn’t really help. How does Google know how often I visit that site? What helps is making the links. (And making the from legitimate, high-value websites, which have plenty of links to them themselves.)



July 28th, 2011

I agree with Richard Rush. Santorum is vile and deserved it, but Dan Savage did a disservice to the gay community by not taking the high road.

Priya Lynn

July 28th, 2011

Richard said “I’m apparently the only one who feels this way:”.

Well, you gave me something to think about. I originally thought the definition of Santorum was a great joke, now I’m not so sure.


July 28th, 2011

@Richard Rush, Erin and Priya Lynn:

Straight people have anal sex, too.

Priya Lynn

July 28th, 2011

Yes, I know Rodolfo, I’m just not sure reminding people of the messy details of any kind of sex between any two people is going to get a postive response.

Stan Wright

July 28th, 2011

Rick Santorum doesn’t have the wit to prevail in a google showdown against Dan Savage.


July 28th, 2011

Dan Savage has managed to keep alive and well the “ick” factor that so many people default to when thinking about the mechanics of anal intercourse. I do not have such issues but many people still do and this wasn’t really all that helpful in the long run, funny as the whole thing has been.

In the film version of Celluloid Closet Quentin Crisp gives the best explanation I think: “And when you contemplate what people do, you think of yourself doing it. And they don’t like that. That’s the famous joke: I don’t like peas, and I’m glad I don’t like them, because if I liked them I would eat them and I hate them.”

Well said Mr. Crisp.


July 28th, 2011

Here in the UK we have a word for people like Santorum. It’s “pillock”.

(Interestingly, I just checked the etymology and apparently pillock comes from the Norwegian word pillicock, meaning “penis”. This is, rather obviously, the meaning of the other short-form of Richard Santorum’s first name. Rick by name, dick by nature!)

Richard Rush

July 28th, 2011

In the same way that Donald Trump is known as “The Donald,”
couldn’t Rick the Dick Santorum just be known as The Dick?


July 28th, 2011

@Richard Rush:

You’re not the only one. I’ve thought it unfunny and unhelpful since it began. I couldn’t believe the giggling immaturity of it.

A definite lapse of judgment on the part of Savage.

Mark F.

July 29th, 2011

Yes, Dan Savage didn’t help things with this stupid “joke.”


July 29th, 2011

“@Richard Rush, Erin and Priya Lynn:

Straight people have anal sex, too.” …And that makes it ok to use childish personal attacks because…? Again, Santorum is vile and deserved what Dan Savage has done to his name, but every time Dan Savage goes on tv or makes an internet video or writes a blog about why it’s wrong to denigrate gay people, the far right has what he did to Santorum to show the people on the fence about the issue. It’s those people we should all care about, and we should be trying to win them over with civil discourse. No, we do not have to be silent and pretend Mr. Santorum does not engage in hate speech when it comes to us, but we don’t have to sink to his level either.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.