Dominionism Is Not A Myth, Continued

Jim Burroway

September 8th, 2011

Evangelical Christian Warren Throckmorton has really taken this meme to heart, and he’s the only one I can think of who has. In his latest post on Crosswalk, Throckmorton takes fellow Evangelical opinion makers to task for developing mass amnesia with regard to the very real phenomenon of Christian Dominionism. And he has posted what amounts to a series of readings for Dominionism deniers on his own web site, and lays out why this new phenomenon matters:

The other issue for me is the erosion of the ability to dialogue with people of various viewpoints. The dominionists see their position as dictated by God. Thus, in a policy discussion, the dominionist can’t give up ground since it is holy. Opponents are not just incorrect, they are evil or as I quote in my article, one of the “enemies of God.” Who makes political deals with an enemy of God?

One can also substitute God for “patriotism” and make a damning indictment for the current state of political discourse as well, and I suspect that’s no accident. Dominionists aren’t alone among other Evangelicals more broadly who have conflated God with the Founding Fathers. So if questioning far right principles is heresy and makes one an enemy of God, questioning conservative orthodoxy today also makes one a traitor and an enemy of America. That’s how you reach the point where persistent accusations that the president is a secret Kenyan Muslim socialist hell-bent on destroying America with his terrorist pals is accepted as just another point of view by a major national “news” channel. Dominionists didn’t necessarily create that phenomenon, but they do dovetail quite nicely with the broader paranoia and self-anointing tendencies of the extreme right as keepers of pure American values. And it’s an extreme which is now becoming increasingly mainstream. That may explain why many voices on the political right can’t see Dominionists in their midst. They really don’t stand out anymore like they would have a decade ago.

Timothy (TRiG)

September 8th, 2011

Warren Throckmorton is not the only one. I encourage you to have a look at the “church and state” tag on slacktivist, where Fred Clarke has had quite a bit to say about dominionist theology, including quoting you.



September 8th, 2011

That may explain why many voices on the political right can’t see Dominionists in their midst. They really don’t stand out anymore like they would have a decade ago.

There is another possible explanation. Many on the political right have every reason to not want to admit that Dominionists exist, because they have moved so far rightwards that it is now all too easy to compare them with Dominionists, and that’s not a comparison the political right wants to see made.

Timothy Kincaid

September 8th, 2011

Warren is a most unusual man.

He is unquestionably a sincere and devout evangelical Christian. He does not have a view of sexual ethics that allows for same-sex sexual behavior. He does not fall on our side of the theological divide (though he does, I believe, allow for each individual to ‘work out their own salvation’ and does not see homosexuality and Christianity as inherently mutually exclusive).

However, Warren has taken on the role of conscience of the evangelical community. This is, without doubt, a thankless job; no one wants to be told that they are lying about Teh Gheys or that their theology consists of a combination of malice and arrogance.

Yet he slogs on: speaking against Uganda; challenging when ex-gay claims get outside the realm of believable; debunking David Barton’s ‘Christian Founding Fathers’ historical revisionism, exposing the Seven Mountains theology and Dominionism for the theocratic movements that they are. And there aren’t too many folks in evangelicalism who really want to hear instruction about what God expects from those who claim to follow him or that God hasn’t given them the right to impose “God’s Law” on the rest of us.

Surely he must at times feel like Elijah. “God, couldn’t you have called me to say good happy things?”

But Warren has the credibility to be heard in that community. It is a unique position and I thank God for him.


September 9th, 2011

“…And there aren’t too many folks in evangelicalism who really want to hear instruction about what God expects from those who claim to follow him or that God hasn’t given them the right to impose “God’s Law” on the rest of us.”

As I have remarked many times on the blog where I moderate, I am of the opinion that much of American Evangelical/Fundamentalist/Pentecostal Christianity has gone so far away from what the Bible really says…and what centuries of (particularly Protestant) Christian Tradition teaches…that it might as well be counted as a new religion altogether.

If people DON’T want to hear instruction (from a Biblical perspective) about what God expects, or don’t want to be called out for being arrogant or lying…and WANT to follow all this man-made stuff that’s not even close to what has defined the Christian religion for centuries…then why bother to call themselves Christians at all??

If they’re going to basically use the Bible for toilet paper…why bother claiming it??

Timothy Kincaid

September 12th, 2011


Be fair. They don’t object to ALL of the Bible; they are actually rather fond of Leviticus… or, at least, the parts that don’t apply to them.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.