January 30th, 2012
NOM has the details on their blog:
I’ve got exciting news! We’ve been told that HB437—a bill to repeal same-sex marriage—will be voted on Next Wednesday, February 1st! Now is the time to call your legislators—especially House members—right away and ask them to VOTE YES ON HB 437! [Emphasis — and exclamation points! — in the original]
If you’re a New Hampshire resident of voter, NOM helpfully provides easy links so you can call your legislator:
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Ryan
January 30th, 2012
Not good news. If they’re voting, that means they probably have enough to override the veto.
Belar
January 30th, 2012
Ryan,
There is a piece in the Concord Monitor that quotes at least one Republican stating that a veto-proof majority in both the house and the senate is not an absolute.
http://www.concordmonitor.com
(It’s #1 under the most read a little down on the page, titled “Gay Marriage Repeal No Sure Bet”
A little piece from the article:
Rep. Seth Cohn, a Canterbury Republican who moved here as part of the Free State project, a libertarian movement to relocate to New Hampshire, is also against repeal. Cohn and others believe the bill may pass the House but does not have the two-thirds majority to override a potential veto by Democratic Gov. John Lynch, who signed the bill three years ago legalizing same-sex marriage.
“I know for a fact, based on people I’ve talked to, that if Gov. Lynch vetoes it, that veto is not override-able,” Cohn said.
Snowman
January 30th, 2012
Where the hell do people get this idea that they can put the rights of others up to a vote?
I would’ve thought there might be enough precedents in American jurisprudence by now that they might get the idea_it’s not right_legally or otherwise.
Maybe if somebody starts advocating for putting the rights of rednecks or old rich white guys up for a vote…once their rights are threatened by such a move, do you suppose they would get it?
I’d bet money the answer would be no.
Theo
January 30th, 2012
BTB, don’t quote NOM and link to NOM’s directory without making it very clear – as in ALL CAPS and bold type – that NH residents should be asking their legislators to vote no.
Ryan, no just because they are voting doesn’t mean they have the votes to override. This isn’t New York. In NH, when a bill is docketed, it gets a vote. Numerous bills have been passed and then vetoed, with the veto later sustained.
I think we will win this round. But that makes the 2012 election critical, since the Dem governor is stepping down. We either need to elect another Dem as governor, or otherwise substantially reduce the super-majorities that the GOP currently enjoys in the state legislature. I’d put that as a top priority, right after WA and ME.
Mark F.
January 31st, 2012
I suspect they will fail in their attempt. There are a few libertarian and / or socially liberal leaning Republicans who will vote against repeal.
Snowman:
New Hampshire and U.S. law currently allows marriage to be brought up for a vote.
Leave A Comment