HRC Names New President

Jim Burroway

March 2nd, 2012

The Human Rights Campaign has announced that Chad Griffin, a founding member of the California-based LGBT group that is challenging Proposition 8 in Federal Court, has been selected to become the HRC’s president.  He will succeed Joe Solmonese when his contract expires March 31.

Despite Griffin’s extensive ties with Democratic and progressive causes — he is an enthusiastic supporter of President Barack Obama’s political campaign, as well as  causes encompassing equal rights, clean energy, universal health care, stem cell research and early childhood education — Griffin has also sought support from people on all sides of the political spectrum. As a founding board member of Americans for Equal Rights, Griffin is credited for recruiting Ted Olson and David Boies as the dream-team attorneys in AFER’s fight against  Prop 8. Griffin will remain on AFER’s board of directors.

It’s worth noting that when that lawsuit was first announced, many other LGBT organizations openly questioned whether AFER was taking too bold a risk. Some tried to derail it, others tried to hijack it, but AFER remained the sole litigant in the challenge that is now before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Where Solmonese showed timidity and a reluctance to challenge political leaders, Griffin has a rather different track record. Is Griffin big enough to lead the HRC to becoming a genuine advocacy group for its constituents — you know, LGBT people and not elected political leaders? HRC is larger than just a president. There’s an entire board of entrenched establishment figures whose access to power and celebrity is at least as important to them as the community’s goals, even when there is conflict between the two. Griffin’s appointment looks promising.

Update: Griffin was also an Executive Producer of Outrage, a documentary about the politics of “outing.” Again, another sign that he’s not one to defer to power.


March 2nd, 2012

I am very excited by this! At least Chad Griffon does something. To me he is substance over image.


March 2nd, 2012

I’ll be interested to see where things go from here with HRC. They often send pairs of volunteers to my campus to collect signatures for various things, and to this point, I’ve always rebuffed them because I’ve decided that there are other organizations that are far more effective and substantial in actually, y’know, advocating for gay rights. If they finally get moving in that direction, so much the better!


March 2nd, 2012

I am cautiously optimistic. I agree that–while Griffin may be less than concerned about ruffling feathers–the board may take issue if they are ever made to feel remotely uncomfortable while having cocktails with their “celebri-tician” friends.

If he proposes to sell the money pit at 1640 Rhode Island Ave. and put the proceeds towards actually getting things accomplished in the trenches, I may consider donating again.


March 2nd, 2012

This is potentially a big story. Right now, we get about 15-20 cents of value on every dollar that HRC takes in. The rest, IMO, is sidelined or misallocated. That essentially takes $34 million off the gay rights battlefield every year. This is why I have always felt that we would be better off without HRC.

If Griffin can make the organization more goal-oriented and less interested in self-perpetuation, then that money might be properly deployed for battle for the first time. It is serious money and could be a real game changer.


March 2nd, 2012

I’m not an HRC supporter but this does sound like a potentially promising choice to lead the organization.

Timothy Kincaid

March 2nd, 2012

HRC’s says the following about the organization:

HRC seeks to improve the lives of LGBT Americans by advocating for equal rights and benefits in the workplace, ensuring families are treated equally under the law and increasing public support among all Americans.

And I’m sure they do seek such improvement. Unfortunately, they haven’t been part of the process of change for quite a while.

HRC’s involvement in ending DADT, in challenging DOMA, in achieving marriage victories, or in electing gay people to office has been minimal, at best. When basically fund-less groups like Log Cabin or Empire State Pride and single issue grass-roots efforts like Victory Fund and Marriage Equality Whateverstate achieve more than the largest most cash-flush most recognized and most “influential” gay organization, it should cause them to question their effectiveness.

Hell, in terms of actually changing public perception, they are hardly players at all. I believe that much of the most recent surge in support can be attributed to a few factors: 1, the tipping point (everyone else supports gays so I will too), 2, coming out (and here Dan Savage deserves piles of credit – while I’m not sure ‘It Gets Better’ necessarily prevents suicides, that movement was the biggest coming-out program we’ve ever seen), 3, permission from religion.

Point 3 is probably bigger than many of us want to admit. When all churches said “no”, a good many people including the non-religious deferred to the church as the voice on “moral issues”. But with Episcopalian, Lutheran, UCC, Methodist, Presbyterian, and even Baptist churches are speaking about equality in terms of God, it removes one of the biggest obstacles in the minds of many people. Sure the Catholic heirachy and the Mormons and the Evangelicals rail against “sin” there no longer is one position. So now people who go to church for weddings, funerals, and Easter every couple of years don’t feel that they are anti-Christian for supporting equality – and, indeed, the unchurched support us in huge numbers.

And these churches didn’t just grudgingly say “okay, I guess”. If you follow the news in smaller towns where we are fighting the battle for local respect, you’ll see a phenomenon that has mostly escaped notice. Almost without exception over the past year or so, the main spokesman for equality is wearing a clerical collar.

And regardless of one’s view on religion,when straight Christian pastors are seen more often in city council and state legislative chambers than HRC, and they are, it should give them cause for self-reflection.

I’ll give them props for their business index. It does impact employment policies under which many gay employees of large corporations work. But I’m not sure it couldn’t be achieved at 1% of HRC’s budget.

Sadly, the potential that they have has been mostly squandered. They’ve become representative less of gay people and more of the gay 1%. In terms of the average gay person their interaction is mostly limited to “here’s your sticker, give me $40” and the impact on individual lives is hard to see.

I suspect, however, that HRC board members see huge accomplishments. They got the President of the United States to speak at their dinner. They are recognized in the halls of Congress. They are seen as loyal and valuable contributors to the Democratic Party.

And there is merit to that thinking. It is good that the President speaks to a gay group. It would be better, however, if it was a gay group that measured its goals and accomplishment in terms other than that speech.

So it is with “here we go again” that I note that they have selected a Democratic Party activist to lead the group. Yeah, that’s going to get us the much needed handful of Republicans on important votes. Sheesh.

But, the ray of hope is that the Democratic Party activist they selected is Chad Griffin. He’s proven himself capable of working across the aisle and putting goals ahead of partisan posturing.

Maybe, just maybe, rather than tell gay voters that we have to vote for the Democrat and walk precincts and give money and overlook her positions will instead tell the candidate that HRC could not possibly endorse someone who thinks we do not deserve equality.

I guess I’m “hopeful but not optimistic”. I’ll have to wait and see.


March 3rd, 2012

That was a good comment Tim.

Today I mailed off a paper letter to Chad Griffin and suggested that he needs to represent the 99% so it is interesting to me Tim that you also referenced the 1%.

I also suggest to him that he and all HRC staff FLY COACH. I told him that those of us in the 99% all fly coach.

Also i suggested that he start leading some street protests. We have to protest on all fronts, in the Courts, in the Halls of our Legislators but also out on the streets. Public Protesting energizes US.

I suggested to him the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would not have accomplished what he did if he did not take it to the streets. And Dr. King was at the front of the marches and protests, leading it. I suggested that for good street protests you gotta have drums. :)

So let’s see if he flies Coach or Business class.


March 3rd, 2012

As a former Federal Club member, I hope Chad Griffin does something to focus more HRC attention to local areas. Having attended an HRC “inspection” of our local club, it was clear that their main purpose was directed to raising funds: “Why can’t your club be more like the one in Dallas?” There was no concern to what we were accomplishing at the local level. (It is expensive to live in DC.)

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.