Anti-marriage Christian theologian says a wise thing

Timothy Kincaid

March 28th, 2012

Russell Moore is Dean of the School of Theology and Senior Vice President for Academic Administration at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. It is safe to say that Dr. Moore and I agree on very little when it comes to matters of sexuality or society.

But Dr. Moore, writing about the proposed Starbucks boycott, recognized something that I think that American Christianity has forgotten: faith isn’t about forcing people to obey you. There may not be much I can share with this man, but I commend the wisdom of this paragraph:

We won’t win this argument by bringing corporations to the ground in surrender. We’ll engage this argument, first of all, by prompting our friends and neighbors to wonder why we don’t divorce each other, and why we don’t split up when a spouse loses his job or loses her health. We’ll engage this argument when we have a more exalted, and more mysterious, view of sexuality than those who see human persons as animals or machines. And, most of all, we’ll engage this argument when we proclaim the meaning behind marriage: the covenant union of Christ and his church.

None of this is new. The founder of Christianity told his followers a couple thousand years ago that the way to follow him was to love – and to do so in a way that everyone else would marvel. Converts would not be made to avoid the wrathful anger of an vengeful god and his curses of eternal flame, but because they wanted to be like his followers. And Moore seems to have – at least for this moment – taken a little trip down retro lane.

And he’s right. Not about the mystery covenant exalted churchbabble, but about what matters in this debate. The argument over equality is not going to be won by whomever can exert the most economic pressure. It’s not even going to be won by whomever has the best political connections or the more articulate orators.

The argument is going to be won by whose lives look the best. And that’s why we are winning.

It’s because while the bible thumpers are threatening JCPenny, the gay couple down the street took in another child born with HIV and drug addictions. While Suzy Churchharpy is collecting signatures to take away rights, Janet Bigdyke is down at the park with a post hole digger trying to get the kids a new swingset. When Mr. and Mrs. Jesushatesyou couldn’t possibly help the troubled kid tossed out by a drunken but church-going father (“we don’t want to condone sin and he’d be a bad influence on our little darlings”), Ms. Raven Usedtohaveapenis found that if you turn the couch sideways there’s room for another kid and there’s always an extra minute to talk to a social worker.

While the Christian Church has been demanding that the world follow its dictates, the gay community has been – mostly unintentionally – following the wisdom of their founder: treat people the way you want to be treated and if you want to be known for something, be known for love.

I hope Moore’s audience listens. I hope he listens to himself. The world would be a much better place if Christians spent less time trying to force me to become what they teach and more time trying to be the best person they could be. And if they want to know what that looks like, they can just take a look at our community.

Bernie

March 28th, 2012

Well said Tim. Well said. Thank you.

randy r. potts

March 28th, 2012

Beautiful, beautiful piece there.

Boo

March 28th, 2012

You know Janet Bigdyke too? She’s pretty awesome.

Timothy Kincaid

March 29th, 2012

She’s very very awesome

;)

Dale

March 29th, 2012

And yet in still very easy count hate groups that do not self identify with a make believe sky fiend. It is about time people as a whole asked if mythologies are actually the problem facing society and not the solution.

[language used for no purpose other than to demean other readers such as “make believe sky friend” is contrary to our Comments Policy. Had not this comment generated far more thoughtful response, it would have been deleted]<\i><\b>

Hunter

March 29th, 2012

First, good commentary. It’s something that needs to be pointed out, and I wish we could hear it more from their side.

Second, I’ve known a number of what I call “real Christians,” and they are just good people — kind, tolerant, generous, compassionate, and non-judgmental. I’ve counted some of them among my closest friends.

Third, @ Dale: mythologies are part and parcel of who we are, and we recreate them to fit the world we live in. The key question, it seems to me, is not “Do you believe in God?” but “What does God mean to you?” I count myself a theist, but I don’t think of my gods as superheroes walking around meddling in my life — they are metaphors for aspects of the world around me. (Take a hard look at any sacred text you wish, and you’ll find it’s all metaphor.) They resonate with something deep inside of us — so maybe you don’t believe in Zeus or Susano or Yahweh, but you have to admit, Elvis and James Dean and JFK have some kind of magic to them. (The boundary between gods and celebrities seems to be a fuzzy one — that’s why it matters what celebrities say: we’ve given them some small measure of deity.)

By the same token, morality is not something, in my view, that you can subscribe to as a rule book that everyone must obey. It’s something you have to think about every day in terms of the behavior and attitudes that are going to create the person you want to be. One of the most ridiculous statements I ever heard was from William F. Buckley, who said “Morality is an absolute.” No, it’s not and never has been. For individuals, it’s a continual balancing act. That’s the huge flaw in the thinking of the social conservatives — they take morality as something that’s given, when it’s really something you have to engage with and think about if it’s to have any meaning.

And frankly, if I’m going to err, I’d rather err on the side of generosity and compassion rather than compromise who I am.

(Hmm — I think one of my buttons got pushed.)

Timothy Kincaid

March 29th, 2012

Hunter, I don’t agree with everything you said, but your comment certainly gave food for thought. Thanks.

Paul in Canada

March 29th, 2012

Nicely written, Timothy. Thanks.

Snowman

March 29th, 2012

Some of those kind of people talk about “the power of god” a lot but I think it’s really just power that they worship.

Snowman

March 29th, 2012

Good post by the way, and I meant for that to be in my last post.

Must. Sleep.

Jay Jonson

March 29th, 2012

It is rather amusing for an official of the Southern Baptist Convention to make this statement. Maybe they actually learned things from their boycott of Disney when Disney first extended domestic partner benefits and allowed “gay days” at their amusement parks. The SBC adopted resolutions calling on all Christians to boycott Disney. (Ironically, they did so at a convention meeting in New Orleans. Yes, while they were meeting in New Orleans they asked their members to boycott DisneyWorld because it was so licentious.) Inasmuch as the boycott was spectacularly unsuccessful, maybe Moore learned something. But, of course, not enough–otherwise he wouldn’t be a Southern Baptist at all.

Clay

March 29th, 2012

Is it so hard to remember that the company is spelled P-E-N-N-E-Y?

Richard Rush

March 29th, 2012

“We won’t win this argument by bringing corporations to the ground in surrender.”

Does Moore mean that if the argument could be won by bringing corporations to the ground, he would support doing so?

Timothy Kincaid

March 29th, 2012

Richard,

He expounds on his meaning in the full article. It’s a rather interesting read.

Moore recognizes that the church no longer holds social veto power. It has caused him and a few other conservative SBC folk to begin to question whether their power paradigm works or is even within the call of their master.

Its a cycle:

Start as an underdog. Do good and love your neighbor. Attract others who see happiness and niceness and want to be a part. Grow until you are a majority. Get a bit full of yourself, dogmatic, theocratic and power hungry. Lose respect and followers. Start to feel rejected. Have divine revelation that your god wants you to do good and love your neighbor.

Blake

March 29th, 2012

There are a couple more gems in there:

Our beliefs about marriage aren’t the way they are because we are in a majority. As a matter of fact, we must concede that we are in a tiny minority in contemporary American society, if we define marriage the way the Bible does, as a sexually-exclusive, permanent one-flesh union.

That line of reasoning pretty much punches a hole in any of the legal or “not-religious” arguments against gay marriage.

With the confidence of those who have been vindicated by the resurrection of Christ, we don’t need to be vindicated by the culture.

That’s anti-dominionism in a nutshell. The whole of the blogpost reads as an argument against the overreach committed by evangelicals of the David Barton / Kurt Cameron variety.

Maurice Lacunza

March 29th, 2012

That was the most succinct article I have read in a long time. It is about love and doing for others. Thanks for writing that.

Ben in Oakland

March 29th, 2012

As always, Timothy, bang on. Anent Dale’s and Hunter’s comments:

I’ve been an atheist for the greater part of my life, or rather, an it-doesn’t matterist. For most of the last 40 years, despite having every reason to do so, I have held no particular animosity towards anyone’s religion. Whatever makes your life better, whatever makes you a better person, it’s all fine with me.

And yet, the past few years, for obvious reasons, I’m having a more and more difficult time maintaining neutrality and tolerance. Not towards ALL Christians, but towards a certain class of Christian– or Jew, or Muslim, or Hindu.

The faith doesn’t matter, even though I think it is usually absurd. It’s the attitude. “I believe X, and I know I’m right, because my version of god says I am. And you’d better believe it, too, or my god, in the person of me, will hurt you.”

And dr. Moore, as close as he is to not being in that certain class, frustrates me no end. He clearly understands the problem, but cannot understand that he chooses to remain a part of it. He STILL needs to be right, to be the only answer, to find the speck in other people’s eye.

As long as he doesn’t actually follow the Christ he claims to serve– as you once so beautifully put it, there will always be an asterisk to John 3:16—- he’ll continue to be the problem even for his own followers, instead of the solution.

Maurice Lacunza

March 29th, 2012

It-doesn’t matterist.

My newest favorite term! Thanks Ben! I think that describes me very well.

Larry Gist

March 29th, 2012

That is my new religion as well! I used to call myself an agnostic – I’ll wait and see kind of guy. Now I truly think I am more of an “it-doesn’t-matterist” because I truly could not care less about religion. That being the case I feel like I have to keep an eye on what the “theists” are doing, because I know that 1) they are out to destroy all that I hold dear, and 2) if no one is really paying them any attention, the next thing you know we are living in a Theocracy with a Constitution based on the 10 Commandments.

Ben in Oakland

March 29th, 2012

Well, gentleman, thank you for the compliment.

The New Church of It Doesn’t Matter is now ummmm, open for business.

we are always happy to accept new un-converts, provided they are willing to embrace totally our deepest doctrine, which fortunately can be summarized in one lightning line– no unholy books and unholy interlopers– strike that, intermediaries– required.

Here is our untheology: The ultimate answers to ultimate questions ultimately don’t matter.

And in keeping with the great examples shown by our forbearers and Saint Lucy,

5 cents please.

Hunter

March 29th, 2012

“Hunter, I don’t agree with everything you said, but your comment certainly gave food for thought.”

Timothy — You’re certainly free to disagree, and I’m pleased to have provoked some thought. But I warn you — I’m not just shooting from the hip on this.

Larry Gist

March 30th, 2012

Hunter I agree with you to a point about the morality thing, it truly is a choice. I like George Carlin’s take on the whole thing. He said you can basically boil the Ten Commandments down to one simple rule: Mind your own f*&^ing business! And if more Xians would find it in their minds to do so then the world would be a much better place. They scream and yell that they are trying to protect innocent children, not realizing that the ones they are trying to protect are BORN the way they are and no amount of coercion or therapy can change them at a fundamental level. They need to mind their own business. To me morality is a choice, when you are confronted with a situation, you can either do the right thing or the wrong thing, but either way we choose, most of the time we can justify the wrong choice in our own minds.

Timothy (TRiG)

March 30th, 2012

By the way Timothy, your link is to Russell Moore’s blog homepage, not to the specific blog post you’re discussing. As he adds more posts, this one will drop off the front page and the link will fail.

TRiG.

Timothy Kincaid

March 30th, 2012

Thanks TRiG, fixed.

Greg

March 30th, 2012

Maybe someday spreading love will be a better and more lucrative business model for an ambitious Chrsitian activist than spreading hate. But until then…

Ravenbiker

April 2nd, 2012

Bingo, Tim:

While the Christian Church has been demanding that the world follow its dictates, the gay community has been – mostly unintentionally – following the wisdom of their founder: treat people the way you want to be treated and if you want to be known for something, be known for love.

Thanks for saying so ellequently.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.