Maine poll shows strong support for marriage

Timothy Kincaid

July 11th, 2012

The Portland Press Herald has conducted a poll of Maine voters to determine their position on the upcoming vote on marriage. The paper used the same language that is on the ballot:

In the upcoming November election, there will be a question on the ballot that reads: “Do you want to allow same-sex couples to marry?” If the election were tomorrow, how would you vote on this ballot initiative?

57% – Yes
35% – No
8% – I don’t know

Every age, sex, and education demographic supports marriage equality. The only group that does not is Republicans, who oppose the initiative 64 to 30.

I was unable to find the poll questions, but the language of the question is very neutral and absent some unknown biasing lead-up questions, I think we can reasonably assume that this is representative of the public positions of the voters. There may be some Bradley Effect and the upcoming election advertising may shift the support, but at present this is very very good news.

ODNT

July 11th, 2012

What did the polls look like at this point in 2009? How did we perform vs polling?

TampaZeke

July 11th, 2012

It’s a shame that so many Republicans are against marriage equality simply because it has become one of those defining litmus test issues right up there with being pro-life. I the Republican Party drops the issue as a “must toe the line” issue I believe a significant portion, perhaps even a majority of Republicans, will become marriage equality supporters. The good news is, Republicans are starting to soften their anti-gay platforms. I think the Young Conservatives for Marriage Equality initiative is brilliant and we be very effective, particularly with young Republicans and conservatives. I applaud those who are working so hard to move the Party into the 21st Century with gay rights and marriage equality.

To be fair, we’re still dragging large parts of the Democratic Party into the 21st Century on the issue too.

Stefan

July 12th, 2012

That actually is not the final language. Even if the Secretary of State keeps it as is our say can go to court and likely get it changed.

F Young

July 12th, 2012

@ODNT “What did the polls look like at this point in 2009? How did we perform vs polling?”

I wasn’t able to find a poll in June or July 2009 that would compare with this July 2012 poll timing-wise, but I found one on Sept 14-16 2009 of 600 likely voters done by Research 2000.

The question in the Sept 2009 opinion poll by Research 2000 was:

“As you may know there will be one question on the ballot this November in Maine addressing the issue of same-sex unions. In part it will read “Do you want to reject the new law that lets same-sex couples marry?” A yes vote takes away the right of same-sex couples to marry. A no vote keeps the right of same-sex couples to marry. If the election were held today would you vote YES or NO on this question?”

The responses to the Research 2000 opinion poll in Sept 2009 were:
48% yes (oppose same-sex marriage)
46% no
6% undecided.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/09/18/783757/-ME-Init-Gay-marriage-all-tied-up-heading-into-November?via=search

A poll by Public Policy Polling Maine just before the vote showed the numbers had changed to:
51% yes (oppose same-sex marriage)
47% no
2% undecided
(which seems to show that the previously undecided all changed to oppose same-sex marriage).
http://publicpolicypolling.typepad.com/pdf/2009/PPP_Release_ME_1102.pdf

In fact, the actual referendum results were:
53% yes (oppose same-sex marriage)
47% no
(which again seems to show that all the undecided changed to opposition to same-sex marriage)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maine_Question_1,_2009

By way of background, the question on the Nov 3, 2009 referendum was:

“Do you want to reject the new law that lets same-sex couples marry and allows individuals and religious groups to refuse to perform these marriages?” A vote of “Yes” would repeal the law, while a vote of “No” would uphold the law.

As this BTB article states, the opinion poll results in July 2012 are:
57% Yes (SUPPORT same-sex marriage)
35% No
8% Don’t know

So, for November 2012, even if all the undecided became opponents of same-sex marriage, that still would not come close to defeating same-sex marriage.

Furthermore, the wording of the initiative question for November 2012 has not been finalized. There is a possibility that it will be changed to clarify that it would not affect religious marriage. If the wording were thus changed, support for same-sex marriage would go up even higher.

So, yes, it’s looking good for same-sex marriage in Maine in November 2012.

BTW I am not connected to the campaign and have no inside or in-depth knowledge of it.

JohnAGJ

July 12th, 2012

I can’t help but be skeptical of this because we’ve been burned far too often in the past. Too many people either are confused by the poll questions and answer the wrong way, or intentionally lie to pollsters because they are embarassed by their real position. The only poll that I’ll beleive now is the one on Election Day.

ODNT

July 12th, 2012

F Young:

Thank you for such a detailed response that was very illuminating.

Another reason to be cautiously optimistic is that the last vote was in 2009, a non-mid-term, non-presidential election year with low turnout, whereas this is a presidential year, which has the highest turnout. Is that something that is priced into the polls already?

Timothy Kincaid

July 13th, 2012

Well said, Zeke

Hunter

July 14th, 2012

Loathe as I am to make predictions, I suspect very strongly that we can expect a spate of very negative advertising just before the election, when NOM starts pumping money into the campaigns. The ads will be all about preachers going to jail and “Save the Children!” because that has always worked for them.

F Young

July 14th, 2012

For what it’s worth, I predict that another factor influencing all the marriage equality referenda in November will be that in October 2012 the US Supreme Court will decide not to hear an appeal on California’s Proposition 8 (and instead agree to hear appeals on the federal DOMA), thus conclusively legalizing same-sex marriage in America’s biggest state.

Stephen Kay

July 15th, 2012

Since prop. hate in cali i don’t trust any poll that has support for us listed as under 60%. I have yet to see one and we have yet to win a referendum concerning full marriage.

Stefan

July 15th, 2012

For the record, NO poll in any state where there has been a referendum on same sex marriage at any point had support as high as the levels in Maine are. In California the highest they ever showed was 55% opposition and in Maine the highest was 53%.

Maine, Maryland, and Washington have all had polls at or exceeding 55% level of support (or opposition in Maine).

F Young

July 15th, 2012

@Stephan “Maine, Maryland, and Washington have all had polls at or exceeding 55% level of support (or opposition in Maine).”

Can you clarify that statement? Did you actually mean:

“Maine, Maryland and Washington now all have polls at or exceeding 55% level of support for same-sex marriage.”

Stefan

July 16th, 2012

I meant Maryland in terms of opposition since there referendum if passed would repeal same sex marriage. Sorry for the mix up.

Mark F.

July 16th, 2012

I am cautiously optimistic that we will win all 4 referendums (including MN) this November. Call me crazy…

Stefan

July 17th, 2012

Mark,

I am very confident that we’ll win Maine and Washington. Minnesota and Maryland I think are tossups, though Minnesota our side has a slight advantage since a blank vote counts as a No. Maryland also has show surges in support for marriage equality since Obama’s announcement.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.