August 24th, 2012
Yesterday we heard about Lutherans, Jews and Evangelicals who are out opposing Minnesota’s proposed anti-gay marriage ban. Today we hear about the Catholics who are supporting it. (Albert Lea Tribune)
Tim and Pat Dusbabek, a married couple from Ramsey volunteering at the Minnesota for Marriage booth, said their strong views are motivated not by hate or fear of gay people but rather hope of creating what they called the most ideal society for children.
“If the amendment would not pass and our marriage laws got overturned, the focus of marriage wouldn’t be on children but rather on adults and their needs,” said Tim Dusbabek, a retired research scientist at Medtronic.
The Dusbabeks, who are Catholic, said they got involved in the campaign after the church they attend in Elk River put out calls for volunteers. Pat Dusbabek said in most cases when she spoke to married couples at the fair, one had a strong view on the issue and the other was more apprehensive.
“We certainly have good friends ourselves who are very much on the other side of the issue,” Tim Dusbabek said. “We just agree to talk about something else.”
Oh, my. Of course we can’t predict anything based on one booth at the fair, but it sounds as though it’s not all happy smiles and sunflowers at the Catholics’ Minnesota for (Only Our) Marriage booth.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Regan DuCasse
August 24th, 2012
If they really wanted to help create more ideal societies for children, they’d crusade to diminish domestic violence, which wipes out entire families.
Especially in custody disputes.
Were they serious about that, they’d crusade for the ability for men and women to get cheap, readily available birth control.
Especially there should be no interference when women want to have a tubal ligation.
And more importantly, they’d support programs and more creative and effective ways to keep young people from drugs.
But noooooooooooo….
They are too busy investing a seriously disturbing amount of money in assuring that only a PORTION of children, will have married parents.
These same people obviously can’t make straight people STAY married, or attend to their parental duties.
But somehow they see something grand and purposeful in fucking with gay adults who ARE committed and taking care of each other and are being responsible to their children.
If I hadn’t seen anything so impossibly stupid and USELESS even to THEIR purpose, I wouldn’t have believed it.
Kathleen
August 24th, 2012
In a totally non-scientific observation, I was actually at the Fair last evening (opening night), from 7-11, and saw not a single Vote Yes person. I did, however see dozens of Vote No folks. (In MN, Vote No means to NOT amend the constitution).
FWIW, among fairgoers last night, there was a complete preponderance of anti-bigots.
Steve
August 24th, 2012
Catholics talking about what’s best for the children are the height of hypocrisy. The arrogance and myopia of them is unbelievable.
Richard Rush
August 24th, 2012
If gays suddenly abandoned their quest for marriage rights, do you think the Catholic Church would direct their freed up time and money to solve the problem of the legions of children born to single mothers who desperately need both a mom and a dad? Me neither.
Hunter
August 25th, 2012
It strikes me that anyone identifying themselves as Catholic would want to back off any discussion of the best interests of children.
customartist
August 25th, 2012
Wouldn’t it be “most ideal” if Heterosexuals would refocus their efforts on improving Their Own Divorce Rates?
Leave A Comment