GOP Billionaires lobby for equality

Timothy Kincaid

April 28th, 2013

We first became aware of American Unity PAC when a handful of Wall Street financiers who support Republican candidates decided that it was time that marriage equality came to New York State. And it was to a large extent their influence which resulted in the Republican Senate Majority Leader to bring marriage to a vote with enough Republican votes for passage.

Having had success locally, they’ve now decided to export their efforts to other states and to be proactive in lobbying for the cause. (WaPo)

American Unity PAC was formed last year to lend financial support to Republicans who bucked the party’s longstanding opposition to gay marriage. Its founders are launching a new lobbying organization, American Unity Fund, and already have spent more than $250,000 in Minnesota, where the Legislature could vote on the issue as early as next week.

The group has spent $500,000 on lobbying since last month, including efforts in Rhode Island, Delaware, Indiana, West Virginia and Utah.

I am certain their influence played some role in the five Republican Rhode Island Senators voting for equality and, as the vote in each of these states needs Republican support for passage, I am extremely grateful for their support.

Mark Cross

April 28th, 2013

Wow…Indiana?! West Virginia?! I’m grateful for the 10 states and DC, but so ready for more place names like these. Mississippi, do you feel the ground rumbling as a distant train approaches?

Mark Cross

April 28th, 2013

…and of course Utah for me, specifically when the LDS Church gets a “revelation” on the marriage equality issue, will be the big one. That revelation is about 20 or so years away, at most, when the current First Presidency and most of the current 12 Apostles will have passed on, and the new leadership realizes the world didn’t end when love was allowed. When not just the State of Utah, but the LDS Church allows same sex temple marriage, then my soul will be at rest.

Richard Rush

April 28th, 2013

I don’t expect to ever vote for a Republican again in my remaining lifetime. I don’t care how pro-gay they become, my husband and I have too many other reasons (which I won’t itemize here) for rejecting them. Those GOP billionaires walked into a match made in heaven when they discovered evangelical Christians several decades ago. The billionaires, while not necessarily bigots themselves, have nevertheless been eager to support any vicious anti-gay legislation or voter referendums if it produced more votes by evangelicals, the only group that the GOP money-crowd found to be gullible enough to vote against their own self-interest. Now that anti-gay campaigns are quickly becoming a no-win strategy, we are seeing some change. How convenient.

I always say the GOP = Greedy Ol’ Pricks

Jim Hlavac

April 29th, 2013

Funny, to quote the previous commentator, with a change: “I don’t expect to ever vote for a Democrat again in my remaining lifetime.”

In fact I never have. I have many reasons for not doing so. Mostly the way Democrats used to despise us too. And it was mostly Democratic run states that kept their sodomy statues until 2003. And it was Barry Goldwater, Mr. Republican who said in 1994: gay Americans deserve full constitutional rights; Mr. Liberal Clinton was signing in DOMA and DADT late at night.

Oh, I’m sorry, the nation is evolving — and if there’s on issue that is simply not political in any traditional sense it’s smooching. Gayness is neither a Left or Right wing anything. It is simply gayness.

So, you go vote for the Dems, and I’ll stick to the Republicans. You may be luckier that your side “evolved” a little faster — but, well, everyone will evolve sooner or later. We’ve been at it for 60 years, what’s a few more?


April 29th, 2013

@ Jim

I would normally not consider someone a troll, but either you are a troll or you do not know what you are talking about. I am pretty sure that Texas, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi,North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Kansas, Oklahoma, Utah, and Idaho are not considered blue states. The only blue state that was invalidated by Lawrence V Texas was Michigan.

As Richard said this is the party that to get a majority of Republicans into power pushed for anti-marriage equality bills in key states in order to push the number of their supporters to come to vote.

Timothy Kincaid

April 29th, 2013


Jim is not a troll. Jim has different values and priorities than you but he is as sincere in his beliefs as you are in yours.

You are correct that those states are – and have been for a while – red states. But for much of Jim’s life the states you mention were Democratically controlled states. It was not until the 80’s when the South went Republican.

Personally, I can’t bring myself to hold such party loyalty as to vote for a party rather than a candidate. I do try to measure the person on their positions and integrity and there are members of both the Republican and the Democratic Party which would never get my support along with those in both parties (and the Libertarian Party) which have earned it.

Michael Smith

April 29th, 2013

I wonder if the push by GOP backers is a pragmatic political move to try and get congress to make a decision before the Supreme Court does. If they can legislate it now, then they can always revisit it later. But if it’s a SCOTUS decision, then repealing it is much more difficult.


April 29th, 2013

The unattributed quote appears to come from The Huffington Post:

Timothy Kincaid

April 29th, 2013

Link to source now included.


April 29th, 2013


It is hard to tell on the internet when one is a troll and when is sincere on the internet. I also want to add that the south started turning red in the 1960s with the introduction of the southern strategy. Then the GOP embraced right-wing christians in the 1980s and then they embraced the anti-government, and often racist, tea party movement.

The party of lincoln has for the last 60 or so years used individuals fears and other biases in order to win elections. I am biased and more liberal and that is why I find it disgusting at the use of hatred to win elections.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.