Congressman Randy Weber proposes DOMA redux

Timothy Kincaid

January 10th, 2014

Randy Weber (R- TX) has yet to make much of a name for himself.

Oh, in addition to his day job as an air conditioner repairman, he also was involved in local Republican committees and on the city counsel of Pearland, Texas. And that was all before being elected to the Texas House of Representatives, where he served for four years.

And when Rand Paul decided to run for Senate Ron Paul decided to retire, Weber won the Republican Party primary for Paul’s seat – after a run-off election. And while Massachusetts’ Mitt Romney did do a bit better than Weeber in his home district, he was nevertheless elected to represent Texas’ 14th Congressional District.

Now, he’s only been in office for a year so he hasn’t really had much time to find the right idea, the vehicle which will define him as a statesman.

He has written one resolution, which would “Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the government’s scientific and technical analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Keystone XL pipeline have repeatedly affirmed its environmental soundness and safety”. But that resolution is currently langering in the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, where Wever is a committee member. And that can’t feel good.

And he’s helped 415 Texans through casework and guided 140 families on US Capitol tours. But doesn’t get you headlines.

However, Roddy Wegle has finally found his issue. He has finally found that one position on which he can get in on the ground floor and make a name for himself.

Werber has now sponsored HR 3829: the State Marriage Defense Act of 2014.

And it’s a real doozy. Very timely. And oh so popular among those whom Weber find a common cause.

Though the text of the bill is not yet available, what it would do is require that the Federal Government change the criteria for recognition of same-sex marriages from whether they were legally licensed, performed, and recorded and instead determine Federal recognition on where the couple lived at the moment. Weger’s bill would have the Feds only recognize a marriage if the state of residency recognized the marriage, thus allowing one state to not only invalidate another state’s contracts, but to force the Federal Government to do so as well.

Now this might be a bit tricky. A couple that moved often might find themselves to be married, unmarried, married, single, civil unioned, or completely confused. Move to New York and you’re married. Move to Nevada and you file state taxes jointly but Federal taxes as single. Move to Texas and hope to God that you don’t live near Weber.

But Ronnie Webbe now has gotten some attention. The Family Research Counsel has endorsed his bill, as has the National Organization for Marriage.

And he has co-sponsors; 27 of them (all Republicans). And while many are fellow Texans with whom you may not be familiar, he’s got some big names on his bill including Joe Pitts, Doug LaMalfa, Louie Gohmert, and even Michele Bachmann, whom we all know so well.

But, alas, it looks as though he might not have been as clever as he hoped. Because this move, as timely and hot-button as he might hope, as joyously received by the stalwart defenders of “the family”, still didn’t get his name into the papers.

Oh sure, the gay blog sites took notice. And the far right disseminators of viewpoint and opinion. But otherwise nothing.

Well, okay, not exactly nothing. It is true that the Sacramento Bee did make available on their website the press release which was issued by the FRC, but otherwise the media attention was the same as if Woober farted in the wind.

No New York Times., No Chicago Tribune. No Duluth News Tribune. Not even the wacky, Moony-owned, far right, anti-gay Washington Times ran a story.

And, sadly for Weder, it’s not likely to get better. While the good ol’ boys at the local Elks Lodge may all think his proposal is a fine idea, the Republican Party leadership will bury this dog. They know that the ship has sailed and that equality is the future and they want nothing more than to have the issue behind them. Preferable before 2016 so they can blame President Obama and the Supreme Court and move on to other issues.

Alas, poor Ricky Weevil. Your second try at establishing your legacy doesn’t seem to be panning out so well. But take heart, you have another year. Maybe you’ll find a way to make everyone remember your name.

Ben In Oakland

January 10th, 2014

Two things.

He ran for Ron Paul’s seat, not the seat of the Man Who Wears a Poodle on His Head.

He admitted that he filed his bill before he had even read the Windsor decision. Sounds like Sarah Palin has some serious competitition in the Speak Before You Know Jack contest.

Timothy Kincaid

January 10th, 2014

Thanks and my apologies to the poodle

David in the O.C.

January 10th, 2014

This is the fallback position for politicians like him that are actually incapable of helping the citizens that elected them. If you don’t have a clue how to fix problems with the infrastructure, or improve the job market, or generally make life better for people living in your district… create the perfect distraction by attacking gay people.

I look forward to the day when the U.S. Supreme Court nullifies all the state bans on same-sex marriage, and I only wish I were standing in the same room with this pathetic hate-monger when he gets the news.


January 11th, 2014

This is a serious nitpick, but you would never file a state tax return jointly if you moved to Nevada. You wouldn’t file one separately either. There is no state income tax in Nevada. For your purposes, Oregon might work, maybe? Not actually sure. (I get your point here, and it’s a good one. The specific just doesn’t work for me, being a tax preparer in Nevada with a husband I married in California.)


January 11th, 2014

The FRC very likely wrote the bill themselves and got him to put his name on it.


January 11th, 2014


My thought exactly, and it looks like it was a rush job. Any guesses as to whether Rep. Weevil had seen the bill before it was announced?

Ben in Oakland

January 11th, 2014

The Poodle forgives.


January 11th, 2014

Just to personalize Rupert Weddle’s bill here:

If you look a the list of co-sponsors, there he is – Ralph Hall, my little sister’s congressman whom she voted for. He’s one of the 11 Texans sponsoring the bill. I tried to tell her she was voting to have my marriage nullified. Her state senator is of the same ilk. I had no effect on her and she was the one sibling I could count on as an ally. So I started my new year by having a schism with my entire family – again. Stupid me. For not learning the first time.

I cannot but feel pain over this, Timothy. I’m from the same Pentecostal background you are but, apparently, a less literate branch. Along with finding out my sister voted for this guy, I got Duck Dynasty rubbed into my nose by several nephews who started out defending Phil Robertson’s free speech rights but when I injected myself into the conservation, the bibles came out in that special way Pentecostals have of taking a verse, saying what they think it means to them, and asserting how obvious it is that everyone they know agrees with them.

Anyway, that happened over the holidays with my sister and various blood kin and I got several emails bawling me out for hurting everyone’s feelings “at Christmas” and then every other petty dig they could think of that goes with “we’re not going to agree with your lifestyle”. I’m still reeling.

Timothy Kincaid

January 11th, 2014

Ray, my sympathies. I hope your family some day comes to realize that keeping a family member is more important than vocalizing every arrogant and hateful thing that crosses their mind.

Ben In Oakland

January 11th, 2014

Ray, sorry to hear about it. I have a lot to say on your post, but no time right now. I’ll leave it at this. Paraphrasing my late, brilliant partner, gone 18 years in a few weeks:

Your family’s attitude is never going to make you sorry that you’re gay. It’s only going to make you sorry that they’re your family. And isn’t that just too sad?


January 11th, 2014

That’s true, Ben. Difficult as it is to admit it. I spoke to my daughter about the confrontations because she lives in Texas, very near to all of my family (I’m in California) and she’s Facebook friends with them. It was sooooo nice to hear her immediately jump to my defense. I’ve been wanting to move to Texas to be near her but with the scramble of marriage legislation such as it is, I really felt I couldn’t move there. I tried to explain that to my family members and it just didn’t phase them. Out of one side of their mouth the would say kind things about my marriage (like how my 31 years in a committed relationship was the longest of any in our family, including our parents), but then turn around and vote for people committed to nullifying my marriage.

I never had to explain the irony of this to my daughter. She brought up the subject to me. She’s my only child and all of my relatives are her only relatives who will endure because, on her mother’s side, she is the only grand child. Period. And when her mother’s side is gone, my daughter’s entire family will consist of my siblings and their offspring. She essentially will have no family. It’s been a sad turn of events for both me and my daughter. My husband is in hospice care right now and I’m sparing him the details. If my family thinks my daughter is going to express shame in the two men who raised her from infancy, they will have a rude awakening. I expect she’ll turn and never look back. Me? Sentimental old fool. It’s like having my arms and legs severed from my body. Again.

David Hall

January 12th, 2014

Do I read this wrong, or does it mean that my poor parents who eloped out of state nearly 64 years ago because my dad was too young to marry in their home state without permission, weren’t really married all these years?
Even those who eloped to Gretna Green were considered married back at home.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.