Tony Perkins: “Winning!”

Jim Burroway

October 6th, 2014

Family “Research” Council’s Tony Perkins has cornered the market on rose-colored glasses this afternoon:

Tony PerkinsIf liberals should be anything, it’s worried. When it comes to marriage, time is not on their side. Deep down, the Left knows it needed the Court to force same-sex “marriage” on America before more people saw the fallout for Christians like Aaron and Melissa Klein. Or sportscasters like Craig James. Or CEOs like Brandon Eich. Ask them if same-sex “marriage” is just about two people who love each other. For them, it was about losing their business, their livelihood, and their freedom.

If the Supreme Court thinks America isn’t ready for same-sex “marriage,” they’re right. As more states are forced to recognize it, people will see the ensuing attacks on religious freedom. They’ll feel the wedge driven between parents and their children when school curriculum is changed to contradict the morals moms and dads are teaching at home. They’ll shudder as more people lose their jobs because they refuse to celebrate (not just tolerate) same-sex “marriage.” Maybe then they’ll realize that the true goal is not about the marriage altar — but fundamentally altering society.

As disappointing as the Supreme Court’s silence is, the good news is that the debate over same-sex “marriage” will continue. With 92 cases on marriage flooding the courts, conservatives have a chance to push back and demand that Congress step in where SCOTUS has not. By refusing to get involved in a mess it helped create, the justices are leaving our laws vulnerable to rogue judges on the lower courts. With the exception of one district court, the benches have been filled with black-robed tyrants who insist on substituting their radical ideology for history, legal precedent, and the consensus of voters and the law. That has to stop.

Jim Hlavac

October 6th, 2014

Who is attacking their freedom? They can hate us all they want … and for all I care preach for my death at their hands, the murderous cads (they’re not quoting Leviticus 20:13 and 18:22 “death to homosexuals” for the hell of it, are they? they must mean murder, and nothing less.)

But what I don’t get, and never have – is why you would so opposed to the happiness of others? As I just pointed out on another of your posts – what Perkins is logically saying is that trashing gay men, hounding us forever for what he himself says it the fault of our fathers — keeps society together. And if a nice word is ever uttered about us — society is doomed.

We just can’t be the lynchpin like this, we just can’t be that important. It’s bizarre. Well, I’m sure his wife will have to listen to him cry all night, and I suppose start to worry where his next paycheck will come from – his job will soon be over.

Ben in oakland

October 6th, 2014

Oh, Jim, there are always muslims and uppity women.

BJohnM

October 6th, 2014

“Ask them if same-sex “marriage” is just about two people who love each other.”

The problem with Tony’s argument here is that he has it exactly backwards. Yes, it is just about two people who love each other. The problem happened when the people he cited decided to make it about some 2000 year old text, and their own personal animus towards a minority.

And, not a single one of those people cited have lost one single freedom they had before any of this. They will still be able to attend whatever church they want this Friday, Saturday or Sunday. They can read from whatever holy text they want to read from, and they can pay for anything they want to pray for to any god they choose.

None of those people lost their livelihood. Eich still has a very good well paying job with Yahoo, the Klien’s, using their personal freedoms, elected to close up their shop, but it appears they still selling cakes out the back door of their house. As for Craig James, his employer, in Canada if memory serves, has the same freedom to decide who does and does not work for them based on whatever criteria they choose. I suspect that even if we still didn’t have marriage equality, he would have been fired following is broad-based anti-gay public rantings. But in the end, he’s still free to say those things.

Neil

October 6th, 2014

Maybe then they’ll realize that the true goal is not about the marriage altar — but fundamentally altering society.

Maybe they’ll realise we fundamentally alter society by legalising homosexuality. Maybe they’ll realise preventing same sex couples from marrying pointlessly retains the legacy of a time when homosexuality was criminalised.

Maybe they’ll realise that reforming marriage law is toward the tail end of a decades long civil rights struggle for equality.

I’ve long since realised the true goal of Tony Perkins and his Family Reseach business is not about the marriage altar – but about fundamentally resisting social inclusion. He doesn’t just want to prevent same sex marriage. He on record as saying he wants to recriminalise homosexuality.

Sir Andrew

October 6th, 2014

Forget the color of his glasses. What color is the SKY in his world?

CPT_Doom

October 6th, 2014

Oh Tony, most of the states that will gain marriage equality with today’s action don’t have anti-discrimination laws that protect gays and lesbians. So your good “Christian” friends will be free to practice their bigotry in their businesses all they want, and then Tony will be able to scream “oppression” when their businesses are criticized or lose customers.

Of course as more Catholic schools and businesses owned by religious conservatives fire their gay-married employees, it is possible opinion will be swayed even more toward gay equality.

LJ

October 6th, 2014

“So your good “Christian” friends will be free to practice their bigotry in their businesses all they want, and then Tony will be able to scream “oppression” when their businesses are criticized or lose customers.”

They’ve already claimed that merely posting a multi-colored sticker saying that “if you’re buying, we’re selling” amounts to persecution. Evidently you’re persecuting them because they believe that us LGBT folks shouldn’t be given the opportunity to know who’s going to discriminate against us until _after_ we enter their shops. If we can avoid accidentally stumbling into their shops, how will they be able to tell us we’re going to hell?

jerry

October 7th, 2014

“With 92 cases on marriage flooding the courts, conservatives have a chance to push back…”

That made me think of the joke about the boy who pestered his dad for a pony for Xmas and ten found the boy flinging the horseshit all over screaming there has to be a pony in here somewhere.

MattNYC

October 7th, 2014

“Tony” “Perkins” is going to have to find a new money maker…

Paul Douglas

October 7th, 2014

I think Tony will milk this old cow ’til it’s bone dry.

Nathaniel

October 7th, 2014

Paul, I think you mean squirting blood. He’s pretty close to dry and showing no signs of slowing.

Regan DuCasse

October 7th, 2014

Oh I enjoyed all your delicious comments!!! Thanks gang…!

Timothy Kincaid

October 7th, 2014

If he was happy yesterday, he must be delirious today. He he

Joseph Singer

October 8th, 2014

Oh boo f’in hoo. Tell the truth that you’re just worried that your gravy train that pays you a six figure income is likely going to be history in a few years.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.