May 28th, 2016
Canada has enjoyed marriage equality for nearly eleven years. Canada’s Conservative Party is only thirteen years old. And with its founder, former Stephen Harper out of politics after losing last year’s general election to the Liberals under Justin Trudeau, the party has some catching up to do. It took one step in that direction during a part convention in Vancouver this weekend:
But a majority of delegates at a Vancouver convention agreed on what they don’t want: to be considered obsolete in a country that officially legalized gay marriage more than 11 years ago. The measure to effectively recognize gay marriage passed 1,036 to 462.
‘Obsolete’ was the same word former Harper lieutenant Jason Kenney used Saturday to describe long-standing Conservative Party policy which declared marriage was a “union of one man and one woman.”
The Calgary MP, long considered a standard bearer for the party’s conservative wing, was unequivocal about the need to jettison the traditional definition of marriage from Conservative doctrine. “I think it’s a no-brainer. This issue was resolved 10 years ago. There is no point in having … obsolete language about something that was changed in law and society a decade ago,” the Calgary MP said.
The Globe and Mail reports that the party’s social conservative contingent “appeared reduced in strength and voice” during the convention. The Tories are expected to chose a new leader a year from now.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Mercedes
May 28th, 2016
It’s worth noting that a few social conservative policies were also added to the platform, including a “respect all life” (stealthy “personhood”) and “conscience” rights for doctors policy. Re: the change in marriage, it was a high publicity item, Canadians all thought it long past due, and the argument was made that they can still oppose LGBT advances, just not make it obvious in the platform. The one difference is that there is a growing “GOProud” type of contingent called “LGBTory” that is no longer being shut out of the party, and is supportive of LGB (T remains to be seen) rights.
Priya Lynn
May 28th, 2016
Justin Trudeau is not the leader of the “Labour” party, he’s the leader of the Liberal party. There is no “Labour” party in Canada.
Jim Burroway
May 28th, 2016
Thanks for the correction.
Priya Lynn
May 28th, 2016
Its nice to see the Conservatives put this behind them. With the exit of social conservatives like Harper hopefully this means the Conservatives are turning over a new leaf.
Ben in oakland
May 29th, 2016
Was this a “nobody agrees with us and we don’t want to lose elections over it” moment…
Or…
Was it a “we realize that we were dead wrong” moment.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Priya Lynn
May 29th, 2016
Ben, from the little bit I heard of people at the Conservative convention it was a “nobody agrees with us and we don’t want to lose elections over it” moment. The impression was that the Conservative party is moving away from its social conservative stance, putting a bit of the old “Progressive” back in front of the “Conservative”.
The forerunner of the Conservative party, the Progressive Conservatives, weren’t at all a socially conservative party. I even voted for them twice back in the day. The Conservative party under Harper did its best to emulate the American Republican party, pushing social conservative religious agenda, anti-science, and lying left and right to try to con the Canadian public into buying into their destructive agenda. I’m sooooo relieved those days are over.
Leave A Comment