Today In History, 1961: First Meeting To Discuss Organizing a New Kind of Gay Rights Organization

Jim Burroway

August 1st, 2016

It was against the law to be a gay government employee. If you worked for the federal government and they even so much as suspected you to be gay, you were out of a job. Most of those who were fired or forced to resign simply disappeared. But when the Army map service fired Frank Kameny (Dec 20), he fought back, just as you might expect a World War II veteran who saw action in the Battle of the Bulge would do. He appealed his firing though the Civil Service, and when he exhausted that channel, he sued the government. He lost the suit and its appeal. When his lawyers told him the case was hopeless and they wouldn’t go any further, Kameny taught himself how to file his own petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. His petition shows his combative nature; he called the government’s ban on employing gay people a “stench in the nostrils of decent people, an offense against morality, an abandonment of reason, an affront to human dignity, an improper restraint upon proper freedom and liberty, a disgrace to any civilized society, and a violation of all that this nation stands for.” The Supreme Court denied his petition without comment (as was customary).

Somewhere along the way, Kameny became not just some guy fighting to get his job back, but a fully assertive gay rights activist, the likes of whom no one had seen before. In 1960, Kameny met Jack Nichols (Mar 16), and the two decided to start a grassroots movement to advance the civil rights of gay people. They contacted leaders of the Mattachine Society of New York, who gave them advice on how to set up a group in D.C. along with a list of potential members living in the area. As was customary at the time, almost all of the names on the list were aliases, including one particular alias for a police sergeant from the D.C. Police Department’s Morals Division.

On August 1, 1961, just five months after the Supreme Court rejection, Kameny and Nichols called a meeting at the Hay-Adams Hotel in Washington, D.C. Before the meeting got under way, one of the attendees who worked on Capitol Hill whispered to Kameny, “That guy over there is a vice cop.” Kameny noticed that “that guy,” Sergeant Louis Fouchette, had a gun and holster under his suit jacket. Kameny walked over to Fouchette and announced, “I know who you are.” His cover blown, Fouchette got up and left before he was able to glean much information about this new group. Nevertheless, he filed a report with the department, and the Mattachine Society of Washington, D.C. was already on the government’s radar before it was officially launched.

Fouchette’s presence was a chilling reminder of just how much work still lay ahead. In subsequent planning meetings before the group’s official launch, the they decided to require everyone in the group except Kameny to adopt an alias. This way, if the police or FBI obtained a membership list or meeting minutes, members who were government employees would escape exposure and avoid losing their jobs. Kameny was exempt from this requirement because he had already lost his job and was blacklisted from further employment. Besides, once you put your name on a Supreme Court writ, you’re about as out as you could possibly be.

Aliases aside, Kameny was determined that the new group would be nothing like anything that had been established before. Until now, homophile groups had mostly limited their activities to hosting discussion groups, often featuring straight “experts” to explain to homosexuals the “problems” of homosexuality. Homophobic messages were so prevalent in society and so thoroughly internalized by many leaders in the homophile movement, that the very idea that gay people might be advocates for themselves was denounced as crazy, radical, and dangerous. The thinking went this way: if we could educate straight people, with straight “experts” being the face of that educational effort (no matter what implicit prejudices those “experts” themselves may hold), then a more educated public would become a less prejudiced public.

Kameny rejected that ideal. He saw the gay community’s situation in the 1960s as similar to that of the African-American community in the 1920s. He had studied the civil rights movement closely — for example, he often cited the Supreme Court decision in Alabama v. NAACP as justification for not turning over membership lists to government authorities — and he saw the need for new kind of organization using direct action to advance the cause of civil rights for gay people. His new organization would be “what the NCAAP is to the Negro.” As he explained to New York activist Randy Wicker two years later:

For us, education is not really what we are seeking to do. As the Negro found out, simple presentation fo truth does not eliminate prejudice. It never has. That is what education is. We are seeking to eliminate prejudice. … We are NOT and educational organization; we are a civil liberties organization. What we are engaged in never was education, per se, and is … rapidly becoming politics.

[Additional Sources: Lillian Faderman. The Gay Revolution: The Story of the Struggle (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2015): 132-133.

Michael G. Long (ed.) Gay Is Good: The Life and Letters of Gay Rights Pioneer Franklin Kameny (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2014): 20-21.]

There are no comments for this post.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.