May 16th, 2008
More GOP strategists see divisive marriage politics as a losing proposition this year:
“At best, it doesn’t move voters, and at worst for Republicans, it moves them against them,” said Matthew Dowd, President Bush’s 2004 chief strategist. “Why are we having a discussion on this issue when we should be talking about things that matter, like the economy, health care, or the war?”
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Ben in Oakland
May 16th, 2008
Precisely what I have been thinking. The wingnuts bleat defend marriage when we’re 9 Tril in debt, in a war for no discernable reason that is going badly, an economy that is tanking with prices rising 20% in the last six months for many items.
If the wingnuts starting doing that (fairly certain) and Dems are smart (unfortunately, probably not) they will say; “Why in hell are you worried about a small minority having equal access to their rights as citizens instead of the serious issues of…”
LIGuy
May 16th, 2008
Funny, I thought it was Republicans not too long ago suggesting a federal amendment to ban gay marriage instead of talking about the economy, health care, and the wars (please don’t forget our soldiers in Afghanistan).
And on top of that, why is it that the vast minority of homosexuals are blamed for the failings of a society run almost exclusively by heterosexuals?
Requirement for politics: good smile, no logic. Smile negotiable.
Ben in Oakland
May 16th, 2008
“And on top of that, why is it that the vast minority of homosexuals are blamed for the failings of a society run almost exclusively by heterosexuals?”
Because we are immensely powerful with our SECRET AGENDA in the left hand and our genitalia in our right– or the other way around, if you prefer. when we’re not doing the secret handhake, that is
Able to bring down mighty empires with a single wink, destroy economies with our vast disposable income, destroy marriage just by getting married, corrupt children just by talking about, y’know– it, and cause people to abandon the faith of their fathers because there is absolutely nothing quite so wonderful and terrible and disgusting and fabulous and attractive and repulsive and natural and unnatural as whatever it is we do in bed, which i wish someone would tell me about so that I can stop being a practicing homosexual AND FINALLY GET IT RIGHT
etcetcetc.
neil h
May 16th, 2008
I always thought that the Republicans tended towards libertarianism, which would surely approve of removing restrictions from people’s lives? Does the religious right still hold sway?
Ben in Oakland
May 16th, 2008
They tend towards libertarianism in the same way they tend towards fiscal responsibility, belief in freddom, and avoding entangling alliances.
i.e., not at all.
Emily K
May 16th, 2008
“Why are we having a discussion on this issue when we should be talking about things that matter, like the economy, health care, or the war?â€
yeah, which is what I said in 2004 while this guy was strategizing for the man that won over these divisive issues. DOY.
Leave A Comment