Tenners officially seeking to reverse Prop 8

Timothy Kincaid

November 16th, 2009

As of today, Californians can begin the process of collecting signatures to get a proposition on the ballot to reverse Prop 8 in November 2010.

Actually, there are five separate propositions for which signatures can be collected. Each reverses the language of Proposition 8 and provides clarity that no clergy person will be required to perform marriages contrary to the teachings of their faith.

It is difficult to state at the moment whether these are competing propositions due to disorganization or if perhaps (knowing their lack of ethics) anti-gays are trying to sabotage the process.

In any case, Love Honor Cherish has a new website, Sign For Equality, with petitions which can be downloaded and printed. So those of you who support bringing this challenge back to the ballot next year can start collecting signatures now. Love Honor Cherish is trying to do this without spending money for signature collectors, so they can use your help.

While I respect the opinions of those who favor waiting until 2012 or later, my personal opinion is that we bring this to the ballot every general election, every two years, until the voters get it right.

Joe in California

November 16th, 2009

Absolutely, UNTIL THE VOTERS GET IT RIGHT!
Go out there and get that petition! Get it signed!
Come out! be noticed! be counted!
For EQUALITY.

Benjamin

November 16th, 2009

You know this is right on! Also this just continues to bring all of us much higher visibility and our issues are raised to the forefront yet again as society changes and evolves until they do get it right. It will happen one day soon. It may even be 2010. We’ve got to be tough because we are tough!

TerenceWeldon

November 17th, 2009

It is important that the supporters of the ballot get their act together and co-operate. If the petitions between them get sufficient signatures, divided between five different petitions, the process will fail hopelessly. Identify which (of the acceptable wordings) has the strongest chance of success, and unite behind it.

Ben in Oakland

November 17th, 2009

The campaign needs to get it right, too. We had a not-as-but-still closeted campaign in Maine, and barely own in washington despite the incompetence and stupidity of the anti-gays.

And yes, i donated to both.

Trovore

November 17th, 2009

You’re all wasting your breath. Its not that our people lost in California because of Mormon Propaganda or some other religious motivation. Its that straight people hate gay people. This is intwined in their primative natures. Its not religion that is our enemy, it is this subset of non-humans that are. Heterosexuality MUST be eliminated in order to ensure our survival.

Donnchadh

November 17th, 2009

Trovore, by insisting that equality is inherently unachievable because of human nature, you are repeating our opponents’ words.

Alex

November 17th, 2009

“Heterosexuality MUST be eliminated in order to ensure our survival.”

Um, what?

wackadoodle

November 17th, 2009

Yeah, trovore is trolling.

Burr

November 17th, 2009

Uhh.. without heterosexuals we wouldn’t even be here to argue about this stuff.. Goofy. And way to trash the millions of heterosexuals who are with us on this fight.

The fact that they can’t even organize around one petition just makes me even more wary of the 2010 effort.

Ken in Riverside

November 17th, 2009

The fact that they can’t even organize around one petition just makes me even more wary of the 2010 effort.

qft.

I am a fatigued Californian voter.

John

November 17th, 2009

If I were a Californian I’d vote for repeal. Having said that, I’m not donating anything to the effort this time. After Maine it is clear to me that a few more years need to pass before we’ll make a dent on SSM. Civil unions perhaps, but not marriage. I wish it were different but I’m a realist. Besides, I’d rather spend more efforts on things like ENDA, DADT repeal, etc. than fight another losing round on SSM. Perhaps if we are successful on these other things SSM will follow that much faster.

Ephilei

November 18th, 2009

Psychologically speaking, I see both an advantage and disadvantage. Advantage: People have more favorable opinions on issues they are more familiar with; more voting means more familiarity means higher of gay marriage. Disadvantage: People’s opinions are made more firm when they follow it thru with action. The more a person physically puts pen to paper voting on a ballot, the harder to change their opinion.

I’d like to hear a psychologist’s view on this.

Robert in San Diego

November 19th, 2009

I agree with John, I will not donate any money to this, I will sign a petition if I come across one and I will vote to repeal it, but I will not do anything else other than that. Straight religious people hate us, sure we got the numbers down from when they passed prop 22 back in 2000 and 69% voted for that compared to 52% voting for prop 8. I’ll remind you that 75% of all blacks voting in 08 pushed the yes vote higher, which is really funny because I have black prostitutes staying at my hotel and they have YES on 8 stickers on their car, because for some reason it’s gays who affect children and straight marriages and not them who sleep with cheating husbands and ruin marriages, yeah that’s right, prostitutes think that I am a bigger evil on this planet when it comes to ruining marriages and not them. At least I would sleep with the husband for free.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.