Illinois GOP Chair Resists Calls To Resign Over Marriage Support

Jim Burroway

January 10th, 2013

Chicago’s WBEZ reports:

The head of Illinois’ beleaguered Republican Party is staring down a revolt from some state party bosses after he bucked the official GOP line last week and urged state lawmakers to approve same-sex marriage.

State GOP Chairman Pat Brady faces growing calls for his resignation, at a time when some Illinois Republicans are rethinking the party’s image and stance on social issues, following a dismal showing in November’s elections.

Brady told WBEZ that he hadn’t spoken to party members before speaking out in support of a proposed marriage quality bill. Brady calls the ban on marriage quality the “last condoned discrimination” in Illinois. It is unclear whether there are enough votes in the party’s state committee to force his ouster. Brady isn’t backing down from the threat:

“If people want to throw me out because I took a stand on an issue of discrimination [as] the chairman of the Republican Party, the party founded by Abraham Lincoln, then that’s – that’s up to them and they’re free to do it,” Brady said. “But I’m not backing down.”


January 10th, 2013

Hopefully this courageous man is the future of the Republican Party. But let’s face it, it’s a distant future.


January 10th, 2013

was looking for an email address to thank him, but can’t locate it…..

Priya Lynn

January 10th, 2013

I don’t think its as distant as you think Zeke.

Bose in St. Peter MN

January 10th, 2013

This is perfect:

“What some voters perceive as extremism on some of the social issues certainly cost votes in November and will cost votes in the future,” Durham said, referring to young voters and suburban women, two key voting blocs. “And there’s a lot of candidates right now doing soul-searching, looking at some of these issues to say, ‘Where are we really on this stuff?’”

For his part, Brady said that’s why he chose to speak up when he did.

“We need to change the brand or the image of the party of this group of angry, old white guys,” Brady said. “And that’s what we look like right now.”

No surprise that Brady didn’t ask the angry, old white guys for their approval, eh?

Timothy Kincaid

January 10th, 2013

I’m inclined to agree with you on that, Priya Lynn. It won’t be tomorrow or this year, but those who fund political campaigns don’t much want to throw money at a losing cause.

Some deep-pocketed GOP insiders also seem to agree with Brady on the marriage issue. On Wednesday, former Exelon Corp. CEO John Rowe, a prolific campaign donor, sent a letter to the State Central Committee warning party bosses about the political fallout of opposing gay marriage.

“We cannot deal with the issues of fiscal responsibility, national security and individual self sufficiency while making so many enemies,” Rowe wrote, according to a copy of the letter obtained by WBEZ.

And there is nothing party bosses fear more than donations drying up.

Bose in St. Peter MN

January 10th, 2013

Manheart: Instructions at are:

If you wish to e-mail a specific member of our staff, please note that all staff e-mail addresses are the first initial of the staff member’s first name followed by their last name followed by – For example, John Doe’s e-mail address would be

As a backup/CC, use

And, especially for IL residents:
Phone: 217-525-0011


January 10th, 2013

I’m glad people are supporting quality marriages.


January 10th, 2013

Thanks so much, Bose!


January 10th, 2013

Not too distant. I think 2013 is going to be the pivotal year for the Rparty getting with about every area of the political program or entirely losing cred. O’Bama is shining a very bright light on their very dark image.


January 12th, 2013

Wow, this is stunning. What a brave man. Now of course, the negative side of me fears the rest of the GOP are going to vote him out, which will discourage future equality-minded Republicans. I guess we’ll soon see. Fingers crossed.


January 13th, 2013

These are Illinois Republicans we’re talking about — Michele Bachmann they’re not. I suspect there will be a fair amount of huffing and puffing and nothing will come of it — social issues just don’t generate that much steam here.

Timothy Kincaid

January 14th, 2013


True. From what I read the Republican Minority leader is negotiating “religious protections” (which I think are the already protected rights such as church hall rental, etc.) and that upon “winning” these “concessions” the bill will have bipartisan support.

Moderates and independents place a great deal of importance on bipartisan votes so the Democrats need at least one or two Republicans so as to give the bill broader public support. Republicans have to look like they are concerned about the poor churches.

Here’s my prediction:

They will all play the game and Seriously Address the fears of the First Church of They’re Out To Get Me and make everyone feel like they were heard.

Then on the floor, Democratic Representatives will make Very Heartfelt Speeches. But it will be the somewhat disjointed tearful speech of some unexpected (and carefully selected) conservative Republican who fought in the gulf war with a lesbian who was ‘the best damn patriot he ever had the pleasure of serving with and she deserves what she fought for’ (while he chokes up and wipes his eyes) which will be the YouTube sensation.

One old Republican Senator who won’t be running again will bluster about sin and Sodom while everyone else either looks embarrassed or has Something Very Important to say to their staff right then. But the rest of the no votes (mostly Republicans and probably one or two downstate Democrats) will not utter a peep during the debates.

The vote will pass marriage with two votes to spare. The supporters will celebrate, and the opponents will forever after say, “well I believe marriage is between a man and a woman but that issue is settled and it wouldn’t be best to bring it up again”.

Or so I guess.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.