October 16th, 2009
Kerry Eleveld at The Advocate is reporting that the White House has come out against efforts in Maine and Washington state to strip LGBT Americans their marriage and partnership rights:
In response to an inquiry from The Advocate, the White House issued the following statement regarding President Barack Obama\’s position on same-sex relationship recognition voter referenda in Maine and Washington.
“The President has long opposed divisive and discriminatory efforts to deny rights and benefits to same-sex couples, and as he said at the Human Rights Campaign dinner, he believes ‘strongly in stopping laws designed to take rights away.\’ Also at the dinner, he said he supports, ‘ensuring that committed gay couples have the same rights and responsibilities afforded to any married couple in this country.\'”
Update: This statement builds on what President Barack Obama said at the HRC dinner last weekend:
Will we uphold the ideals on which this nation was founded: that all of us are equal, that all of us deserve the same opportunity to live our lives freely and pursue our chance at happiness? I believe we can; I believe we will. And that is why I support ensuring that committed gay couples have the same rights and responsibilities afforded to any married couple in this country. I believe strongly in stopping laws designed to take rights away and passing laws that extend equal rights to gay couples.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Bryan
October 16th, 2009
Ok, this is all well and good, but please show me where exactly he directly says that he opposes the ballot measures in the particular instances of Maine and Washington. This is the problem with Obama: nothing but vague generalities.
Ben in Oakland
October 16th, 2009
yes. absent were those two place names.
Alex
October 16th, 2009
Thanks for saying that you support us, Mr. Obama. Now, what are you going to DO about it??
David C.
October 16th, 2009
The POTUS usually stays out of state politics because failing to do so has traditionally been a no-no. Making a blanket statement like this one continues that tradition. The content of the statement is at least useful and its shelf-life will be long.
The good news is that the Approve R-71 in Washing state and No on 1 in Maine campaigns can now use this statement by Obama in their messaging.
Duncan
October 16th, 2009
It seems Obama opposes anti-gay, state-level laws whatever their democratic credences, but refuses to act on his own democratic mandate to remove those at federal level.
Stefano A
October 16th, 2009
Big whoop… So, a statement was made to The Advocate when they asked. There is no such statement made on the White House web site with regard to Maine or Washington; ie, current pending referendums. So what if a statement was made to the “choir”. It doesn’t reach the “masses”.
I agree with Bryan above.
Thomas
October 16th, 2009
O is a big D… As in Disappointment. The time to act is now. Next year is mid-terms and then begins the race for the White House again. In between all this we’re asked to give more $$ for presidential platitudes. I don’t think so. If it’s not happening now it’s not happening anytime soon from our fierce advocate.
Stefano A
October 16th, 2009
PS
I think Jeremy Hooper sums it up well.
Ben in Oakland
October 16th, 2009
31 years ago, President Carter said No on 6– the briggs Initiative– in as many words while he was in california. Ronald reagan said No on 6 in as many words.
All we get is blahblahblah opposed to something blah blah blah.
Where is Inigo montoya when you need him?
Leave A Comment