Candidate Obama Addresses HRC

This commentary is the opinion of the author and may not necessarily reflect those of other authors at Box Turtle Bulletin.

Jim Burroway

October 10th, 2009

Barack Obama at the HRCWhen he becomes President, he’s going to sign the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act, he’ll sign the Employment Non-Discrimination Act if it ever sees the light of day, and sometime during his presidency he’s going to end Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Oh, and he’s gonna appoint a gay ambassador or two, and we’re all invite to the big Easter Egg roll.

Seriously, I guess it was a good speech — a great one considering that it reflects the sentiment of a sitting president. “My commitment to you is unwavering,” he said, and I actually believe it as far as the speech goes. Which makes it a home-run of a speech when compared to previous Presidents’ speeches I can name. And I really like the way he promised to stand behind his LGBT appointees against a blistering attack by the right.

And we must not lose sight of the fact that he is appearing before a major LGBT advocacy group. Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t recall a president speaking before, say, Focus On the Family or at the Values Voter Summit. Obama’s presence at the HRC made for about an hour’s worth of video tape which can be used by his opponents in 2010 and 2012. Meanwhile his remarks will be discussed on Sunday morning talk shows and news outlets across America among the larger American audience who really hasn’t been much engaged in these issues. The topics he raised went out to a much broader audience, and not just to the LGBT people and their allies in that room. These are no small things. Let’s take a moment to be grateful for it.



Okay. Moment’s over. I think we’ve all heard this speech before. It’s an oldie but goodie. I’ll never tire of hearing it. But the great thing about being President is that he can do a whole lot more than just give speeches to the diehard faithful. Now that, you know, he’s actually President, he has a tremendous bully pulpit with Congress — and with voters in Maine and Washington (which, by the way, he didn’t mention). There are some Executive Orders he can sign on DADT, and some DOJ briefs on DOMA he can influence. You know, Presidential executive-type stuff. Action-type stuff.

I hope this time next year, we’ll get to hear from President Obama, not Candidate Obama.


October 10th, 2009

Am I seriously supposed to be impressed he’ll repeal DADT ‘sometime’? Something other countries did a DECADE ago?

President Spineless is just vomiting up more empty promises. I want him to actually do something, to condemn the bigots, and theirs absolutely no reason for it besides bigotry, denying us marriage and other rights. but that might cost him votes and its not like we can go republican, so he won’t do a goddamn thing.

Rick in Kansas

October 10th, 2009

I don’t know what annoyed me more, yet another round of lip service from the President, or the crowd at the HRC letting him get way with it. It’s probably a good thing he didn’t try to give this blow job to the crowd at the equality march tomorrow, there would be a well deserved riot in the streets. When given the chance to mend fences with our community he chooses to give us the same speech he’s essentially been trotting out before gay audiences since the freaking Democratic primaries. While this may have been enough for the adoring sycophants who are still wasting their money on the HRC, it wasn’t nearly enough for those of us far less privileged.

There was no mention of state ballot measures attempting to strip equality from same sex couples in Washington and Maine. There was no time table even hinted at for an end to DA/DT, let lone an immediate end to the on-going dismissals, which IS within the power of the President to accomplish. That is if he really wanted to. Nothing but his previous promise to repeal DOMA, not even one word of support for the repeal legislation already in Congress. In the biggest insult of the evening, the only use of the words married or marriage was in reference to opposite sex couples, gay couples were relegated to “relationships”.

While I realize that he’s better than we had, that really doesn’t take much doing and he’s not doing much. This speech was nothing short of insulting on so many different levels, offering us nothing more than the table scraps we had already been offered but still haven’t been given. While I hope that we’ll all be able to look back at the Obama administration and admire his accomplishments, but as it stands right now, that look back is looking pretty dismal….


October 11th, 2009

Two wars,health care,the economy,and a conservative opposition that is without question pigheadedly unmoving.We are not all Mr. Obama has to deal with.
I say give him a reasonable amount of time to come across with his promises. He hasn’t been in office one year yet.
Rome,as they say,wasn’t built in a day.If in a years time nothing has happened,I will join the chorus of “he’s another in the long line of promise breakers”.Until then, good speech Mr. President.


October 11th, 2009

So what you’re saying Eddie is that we elected a simpleton unable to multi-task?


October 11th, 2009

Now John you know the president is just so busy, so incredibly busy he cant take less than 10 seconds to give his support to Maine or Washington. And of course he’ll be ‘busy’ until the day he leaves office!

Ben in Oakland

October 11th, 2009

Unfortunately, what I expected, which was not all that much.

He’s better than bush, but you would have to be a complete effin’ idiot not to be.

All I can do is wait, at this point. but I suspect this life-long democrat– I’ve voted for only two republicans in my life– may not be staying with the party forever.


October 11th, 2009

Even President Jimmy Carter took the time to say “Vote no on the Briggs initiative.” when he came to visit California back in the 70’s.

Why can’t Obama just say as much with Prop. 1 in Maine and then tell Washington state that they should approve ref. 71, especially since Ref. 71 is ALL about domestic partnerships!

Since it’s not even granting “marriage”, Obama should be all for Ref. 71!!!

Timothy Kincaid

October 11th, 2009


Well I’d rather have the hope of possibly empty promises than active opposition. There, that’s my happy spin on things.


October 11th, 2009

Yes, I agree with Timothy.

My husband and I (06/27/08 – San Diego, CA) just watched President Obama’s speech at the HRC dinner and I must admit that we were very moved by it.

No, we aren’t happy that DOMA is still in full effect right now.

No, we aren’t happy that DADT is still in full effect right now.

And NO, we are not happy with a whole host of anti-equality over most of America.

But, President Obama has to be given praise for at least speaking with us and speaking in “favor” of us.

The opposite of which would be to have a national/world leader speaking against us, telling us that we are an abomination and that there should be more laws to eliminate or limit or rights and to strengthen existing laws against ANY possible judicial actions.

Given this example, I really do feel that we still have some flicker of hope, versus total darkness under some kind of “Bush 2” type of administration.

But, even President Obama himself stated to not become complacent and to keep lighting fires under the feet of our elected representatives to actively work to enact our equality!


October 11th, 2009

I wrote to the White House telling them that I appreciate the words, but President Obama won’t get my support in 2012 if there is no action to back up his words.


October 12th, 2009

Well, yes.

But things will different AFTER he is elected. He just doesn’t want to scare the horses beforehand. We can all appreciate how that works. Also, he’ll probably need a strong position on that ‘The Hill’ thingy; and what chance is there that this will happen?

Remind me again: your elections are in November sometime aren’t they?

And if you’ll forgive me for making only a flying visit, but I have to catch a slow boat to China. Cheers.

ps: standard reminder: our gay soldiers serve openly. Which must make sharing showers with our American allies rather awkward. They are probably so freaked out that an Aussie might be checking out their (frightened) equipment they’ll probably forget to worry about IED’s, or flak jackets, or breakfast, or something. And that’s no way to run an army.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.