June 2nd, 2008
The total number of signatures required to place the anti-gay marriage amendment to the California Constitution on the ballot is 694,354. The procedure is to have the county clerks test a sample of the signatures and if the extrapolated valid signatures exceed 110% of the signatures required, then it is assumed that enough signatures were received.
The total number of extrapolated signatures required is 763,790.
Currently, the Secretary of State is reporting that there are at least 732,860 valid signatures with several counties as yet unreported. The initiative supporters require another 30,930 valid signatures of the 175,124 signatures yet to be tested. I think we can say with certainty that adequate signatures were collected.
In the next few months, each of us should consider what we are willing to sacrifice to help in the effort to ensure that gay couples in California retain the right to be treated equally under the law. This issue is closely divided in the state and anything you can give to help appeal to the decency of everyday Californians will be needed.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Ephilei
June 2nd, 2008
For those of us who don’t live in CA or know voters there, what are you suggesting we can do?
Timothy Kincaid
June 2nd, 2008
Wait until we are sure that the initiative will be on the ballot – there are still some legal challenges that it could face.
Once it’s approved, think about what you can afford to send to the campaign to protect marriage from anti-gay bigots. I suspect that Equality California will be leading the efforts, but I’ll let you know more once we are sure.
James
June 2nd, 2008
We need to start now with a sensible ad campaign — maybe hire the same ad agency that did these for Canada:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBH4X9r3arc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYp1Nf4DgH8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-bftAkAg5M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_lG3kDZJ3E
Luis
June 2nd, 2008
Well, my partner, soon to be “husband”, and I will be taking a large chunck of our stimulus check and giving it to the California group Equality for All, http://www.equalityforall.com/
They’ve stated that all of the proceeds will go towards defeating this discriminatory amendment in November.
Also, in lieu of wedding gifts, we are asking all our friends and family to instead make a donation of whatever they would have spent on the wedding gift to Equality for All instead.
Hopefully California public opinion on same-gender marriage has come a long way since Prop. 22 passed in 2000 and people are sick and tired of all this discrimination and this amendment will die a cruel death!
Kim Ridley
June 3rd, 2008
My partner/fiancee and I are also instructing our wedding guests to donate to Equality for All in lieu of gifts.
I’m planning on doing canvassing too, going door to door. We don’t move back to CA until August, and are getting married in September, but I will do whatever I can to stop this thing.
Ben in Oakland
June 3rd, 2008
Great idea, luis and kim.
My partner and i are doing it in august. we planned on just a small legal thing with a couple of friends only, as we will be doing the (real, fun, and meangful) big thing next year when he graduates.
But I will send out announcements to all of my friends and colleagues, and ask them to donate to EQ CA.
cowboy
June 3rd, 2008
I appreciate the videos, James. The first one is by far the best. I just think some of my even moderate conservative friends would cringe or have that “ick†feeling when watching the 3 other short videos. They’re not ready to watch two men kiss or be seen sleeping in the same bed. We haven’t gotten too much farther than the Will & Grace episode about two gay men kissing have we? Just see the reaction of the two gay characters on some soap opera that is making the news lately.
I’m not sure those last 3 videos would convince my friends to vote for my equality. But, the first video on your list was excellent.
Leave A Comment