A Rosary for Falwell

A commentary

Jim Burroway

May 16th, 2007

Note: These opinions are mine and mine alone.

Just as I expected, anti-gay activists are appalled at the number of “sodomites” who greeted Jerry Falwell’s death with a less-than-somber attitude. In fact, some of them have responded to his death with undisguised glee.

I understand the celebrations, and I understand why some would be offended. In my own defense I didn’t break out in song when I heard the news — although to be honest, my first thought ran along the lines of “one down, so many more…” My second thought was to phone my partner and ask nonchalantly, “have you heard the news by any chance?” He hadn’t. “Falwell died,” I said. And that was about it. It was as if we ran out of coffee that morning and I wanted him to stop at the grocery store. In fact, I reminded him that we really had run out of coffee before hanging up.

But it’s true, some responded with celebrations and dancing. It’s probably not the most mature or civil way to act when someone dies, but since when have maturity and civility been hallmarks of the give and take between Jerry Falwell and the gay community?

In the 1980’s, as the gay community was facing the greatest calamity it had ever faced, there was Falwell’s visage on television, thundering, “AIDS is not just God’s punishment for homosexuals; it is God’s punishment for the society that tolerates homosexuals.”

This was a time when thousands of men were being cut down in the prime of their lives, felled by a new and frightening disease. Many were fired from their jobs, kicked out of their apartments by fearful landlords, abandoned by their families, cursed by their neighbors, and reviled by national leaders. This adversity brought the gay community together in a way nothing else could. And it was other gays and lesbians who took them in, walked their dogs, cooked their meals, cleaned up their vomit and their soiled sheets, and generally did all the things that no one else would.

And when they had a chance to look up from the hard work and the horrors around them, there was Jerry Falwell, bellowing, “AIDS is the wrath of a just God against homosexuals. To oppose it would be like an Israelite jumping in the Red Sea to save one of Pharaoh’s charioteers.”

These images are impossible to forget, especially for those who lived through those darkest of days.

When that darkness began to recede with more effective medications, we still couldn’t shake Falwell’s blame whenever something when horribly wrong. There he was again, just a few days after 9/11, saying that God had lifted his veil of protection and allowed those atrocities to go forward all because of us, among others.

He apologized shortly afterward, but then just last week he told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour that he stood by those remarks. What a class act.

So yeah, I imagine that some are offended by the celebrations of this man’s death. I don’t blame them. After all, these celebrations really are offensive, no doubt about it. But while I can understand why they’d be offended, I cannot share their outrage. I can’t even muster a shrug. Instead, I’ll just confess my sin of indifference and maybe with God’s Grace I can overcome it with time.

Christ said, “All men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” St. Augustine well understood this when he said, “Preach the Gospel at all times, using word when necessary.” They understood how important it was for preachers of the Gospel to set an example. Proclaiming the Gospel is more a matter of how one lives than it is the words that one uses.

But all too often, Falwell’s example consisted of using injurious words while remaining stingy in deed. And with those words, the gay community was often the target of his ire whenever there was death and destruction.

And so with Falwell’s death, some in the LGBT community are responding in kind. No, it’s not the best response, but look at it this way: If Falwell did set the example, then I’d say those who are celebrating are following his example pretty well. Granted, Falwell never celebrated anyone’s death as far as I know, but he certainly knew how to exploit grief and suffering. And in that sense, it could be argued that those who are celebrating are taking a page out of his playbook. They’re just running a different play. Tacky, offensive, inappropriate and ill-mannered — all of this is true, but there you have it. Offense is repaid with offense; outrage with outrage; an eye for an eye and all that.

As for me — and I’m not making any promises here — but I may try to follow a different example. I’m not sure that Falwell would approve, but at times like these I have a tendency to fall back onto my Catholic roots. It’s the tradition in Catholicism to pray the Rosary whenever someone dies.

I did this just last January, when my family gathered to pray the Rosary on the evening before my grandmother’s funeral. I used my old rosary to guide me in the prayers, a rosary that had belonged to my grandfather. My grandmother gave it to me after he died thirty-seven years earlier. That rosary has carried me through an awful lot over the years.

If I think of it — if I find a quiet moment and if my better nature retains the upper hand — I may pray the Rosary while meditating on the Sorrowful Mysteries sometime this weekend. If I do, I’ll pray for Jerry Falwell (my guardian angel has already admonished me for imagining this Baptist preacher’s reaction to a gay Catholic praying for his deliverance from purgatory), and I’ll pray for his family. His family most certainly deserves our prayers and condolences during their time of sorrow.

But I gotta be honest here — and this is not something I’m proud of — but if a parade should happen to pass by, I may get distracted and go outside instead. I don’t think I’d join in necessarily, but I’d probably at least stand in the doorway and watch.

PomoProphet

May 16th, 2007

I went to Falwells school. I certinly didnt agree with everything and would oppose many of his comments, specificly in reguards to sexuality. But My experience is neither here nor there.

I think its pathetic when anyone celebrates at the death of someone who they disagree with. That shows immaturity on the part of those celebrating. It’s immoral even. And I say the same thing reguardless of who it is celebrating who’s death.

Those who do celebrate, show that they are no better (or different) than the person who they so desperately hate.

Kevin

May 17th, 2007

It seems rather interesting that so many on the Right would be offended by expressions of celebrations by the victims of their oppression. . .after all, there are certainly enough “religious”-based con-servatives who openly and publicly advocate for the dehumanization and, yes, sometimes, the death of those in the American GLBT community. And I rarely see any public rebuke for their offensive manufactured science, their distasteful conjecture of perceived fantasies of our intimate lives, and their superstitions that our very existence somehow poses a threat to their imagined moral purity.

Why should they get a free pass? As it is, I would be quite surprised if the targets of Falwell’s rants picket his funeral or demonstrate wildly outside the halls of Liberty University. But we do know Westboro Baptist will likely be there with their traveling circus of celebration of all death.

MBSF

May 17th, 2007

I would care if the right and specifically thin skinned “christians” hadn’t made a cottage industry out of fake outrage. Yawn.

Shimmy

May 17th, 2007

Falwell says, “God loves you — come and buy the good news!” Then he buys the president and swimming pools!

Timothy Kincaid

May 17th, 2007

Jim,

I admire your attitude. Though as a Protestant I don’t pray the Rosary, I too am trying to find kind thoughts to think about Falwell. It isn’t easy.

Randi schimnosky

May 17th, 2007

PornoProphet said “Those who do celebrate show they are no better (or different) than the person they desperately hate.”

Really now? So are you going to honestly say the innocent Jews who survived Auschwitz were no better than Hitler if they celebrated his death? I don’t think so.

homer

May 17th, 2007

I’m afraid I don’t have a lot of empathy for Falwell. He made his bucks promoting hatred of other, different people and had little remorse for the psychological and physical damage that resulted because of his power.

Kevin

May 19th, 2007

I live in the Castro right down the street from where this anti-Falwell ‘celebration’ was to take place. But it didn’t. A few showed up, but I heard that there was more press than people ‘celebrating.’ However, there were some who spoke out against the hate that Falwell spewed. I wouldn’t call this a celebration, nor do I think it is immoral to remember a person who caused lots of pain. I have read many, many articles in the mainstream newspapers and they all mention his legacy of hate. This isn’t immoral. It is telling the truth.

I should say that I did not go to this.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.