May 24th, 2007
As I said yesterday, congratulations on Mary Cheney and Heather Poe on the birth of their healthy baby boy. Since I posted that announcement, I’ve thought about it some more and have a question I hope someone can answer.
I understand that Mary may not feel much like having her picture taken right away, but it’s odd that the first publicly-released photo is one in which the grandparents are holding the baby. Sure, these particular grandparents are famous and powerful, but isn’t it traditional to wait until the baby’s parents are ready to have their photo taken? After all, they’re the ones who will be raising little Samuel, not the opposite-sex couple you see smiling in the photo.
Or are Heather and Mary reprising their disappearing lesbian act from the 2004 Republican National Convention? Or am I making too much out of this? It just strikes me as odd.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Erica
May 24th, 2007
When my daughter was born, her grandparents were falling over themselves to get photographed with the new baby, and sending pictures to every relative and friend they could think of. I personally didn’t want to be in snapshots — I felt like I’d been hit by a bus — luckily, I’m not famous enough for the media to try to capture my image for posterity!
Every parent is different (and the stresses of public attention can only make things more difficult), but personally I was proud as could be of having my child photographed whether I was in the picture or not.
Jim Burroway
May 24th, 2007
Maybe I’m making too much out of this, but I thought it was odd for this to be the first public portrait of Samuel. This is usually a more carefully considered decision than snapshots shared among family members.
I can certainly understand though if Mary doesn’t think she’s quite ready for her close-up.
Timothy Kincaid
May 24th, 2007
I’m not seeing it as a deliberate exclusion… yet
Anna Rose
May 29th, 2007
When grandson Philip Richard Perry was born to Liz Cheney and Phil Perry in July 2004, the White House issued the same type of photo: The baby with Dick and Lynne Cheney. Maybe they’re just being consistent?
When grandson Philip Richard Perry was born to Liz Cheney and Phil Perry in July 2004, the White House issued the same type of photo: The baby with Dick and Lynne Cheney. Maybe they’re just being consistent?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/07/images/20040702_vp-gra
Leave A Comment