Stephen Bennett: Alan Chamber’s Got Some Explainin’ To Do

Jim Burroway

June 19th, 2007

It looks like Stephen Bennett has gotten over his initial disbelief on discovering that Alan Chambers told the Los Angeles Times that he doesn’t like the term “ex-gay” and that “by no means would we ever say change can be sudden or complete.”

Bennett’s first response was to wail, “I have to say with every breath of my being, I believe Alan COULDN’T have said the things the LA Times claimed he did.” But now it looks like reality is closing in on him, and his shock has turned to anger.

Bennett released an exceptionally long press release, in which he “condemned the irresponsible and disturbing remarks attributed to and made by Alan Chambers.”:

Bennett, along with many others pro-family leaders, were shaken Monday by Chamber’s remarks and are eagerly awaiting Exodus International’s official response to their President’s misguided statements.

…Stephen continued, “What we see here is the public divide of the pro-family movement. One camp believes ‘dialoguing’ with homosexual advocates and activists will bring about a happy middle ground and compromise for all. That, I’m afraid, will NEVER happen. You see, ‘compromise’ is not in God’s dictionary — and of course homosexual activists are loathe to compromise on their core beliefs. The other pro-family camp biblically believes homosexuality is, was and always be a sinful lifestyle that individuals were not born with, yet a lifestyle they CAN experience COMPLETE freedom from. I am in that camp. I don’t believe in encouraging a dysfunctional, dangerous and potentially deadly lifestyle, but COMPLETE liberation from it.”

I’m predicting a very entertaining cat fight coming on.

But in all seriousness, I’m encouraged by Alan’s bravery in making these statements. When I was writing my series of posts about Love Won Out, I left off at Part Four last April, leaving everyone hanging about Alan’s candid talk. I haven’t been able to finish writing Part Five, partly because I wasn’t sure how Alan’s words at that conference could possible fit in the larger picture. With these recent events, I’m glad I hesitated because Alan is now beginning to say publicly some of the things he’s previously confined to a “safe” Evangelical audience.

I think a very interesting picture may be starting to emerge. It’s still not one that I’m at all prepared to endorse. We are many miles apart on so many issues — particularly where Exodus’s political activism is concerned. And truthfully, I think we probably always will be. As I illustrated earlier today, he’s not exactly becoming an ally.

And so it will be interesting to see if this is the beginning of a new evolving message. And if it is, what role will that message fill alongside Exodus’s ongoing political activities? It will also be interesting to see if Focus on the Family and other ex-gay groups pick up on any of these messages. Nuance (yes, I’m using the term loosely) hasn’t been their strong suit.

Stephen Bennett’s broadside brings a movement to an interesting crossroads. The question now is who will epitomize the future of the ex-gay movement? Chambers? Or someone like Bennett? The choice couldn’t be more stark.

Hat tip: Scott.

See also:

Stephen Bennett: Say It Isn’t So!
Stephen Bennett: Alan Chamber’s Got Some Explainin’ To Do
Peter LaBarbera Joins Stephen Bennett In Ex-Gay Cat Fight

Joe Brummer

June 19th, 2007

I find Bennett’s stance that compromise is not an option deeply disturbing. As we are currently in a bloody war in the middle east with another religious group who also believes their god will not compromise. You can see where a lack of understanding, a lack of the vision of how we are all conected gets us to very ugly places. Bennett’s current view is more than scary.

Each time I read the stance of people like Bennett, I see more and more that his fear of displeasing the pro-family groups and his idea of god is the same material major wars have been created from.

Seeing others as part of ourselves is the only true way to finding peace in the world. Bennett seems to think if he disconnects or changes from the message he thinks god wants, he will burn. In reality he will make a step towards peace. Peace only comes from the bottom up. We won’t get world peace from the top down, but from each interpersonal experience we have. Compromise, negotiation and compassion are important and evident roles in that peace. Bennett seems to reject that.

Lynn David

June 20th, 2007

What Chambers said is not what Exodus espouses [http://exodus.to/content/view/34/118/]:

Exodus affirms reorientation of same sex attraction is possible. This is a process, which begins with motivation to, and self-determination to change based upon a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. … The key outcome of this is measured by a growing capacity to turn away from temptations, a reconciling of ones identity with Jesus Christ, being transformed into His image. This enables growth towards Godly heterosexuality. Exodus recognizes that a lifelong and healthy marriage as well as a Godly single life are good indicators of this transformation.

I don’t think that his fundamentalist base will back Chambers. They may view his media appearances over the last year or so as lacking in that Christian fervor needed to head Exodus and playing into the hands of “gay activists.” Bennett is afterall saying what they want to hear, which is all important, even though it not be truth.

Emproph

June 20th, 2007

Thank you Lynn David for the Exodus Statement on Homosexuality link:
http://exodus.to/content/view/34/118/

With all the ‘mainstream’ Exodus double speak, I’d nearly forgotten what a sick and disgusting person in the eyes of God I am.

..I remember now why I’m STILL angry.

cowboy

June 20th, 2007

“…I left off at Part Four last April, leaving everyone hanging about Alan’s candid talk.”

Much like waiting for the next installment of A. Maupin’s Tales of the City! — wouldn’t you say?

Timothy Kincaid

June 20th, 2007

Well lets hope, cowboy, that it isn’t an 18 year wait like it was for Maupin’s latest.

Jim Burroway

June 20th, 2007

Maupin.

Okay. Fine. Up the pressure… ;-)

toujoursdan

June 22nd, 2007

It’s sad to see the spirit of the age take root and “compromise” become a dirty word. Of course compromise is in God’s vocabulary. There are numerous examples of God doing that in Scripture itself when challenged on what he was going to do. There was compromise expressed by the Council of Jerusalem in the Book of Acts when it came to the demands of the Gospel.

There is no reason why people of differing beliefs can’t find a reason to get along.

Truth in Technicolor

September 11th, 2007

Bennett has more “splain’n” to do than Chambers. Bennett, you’re bisexual. Stop shame’n it. Name it and claim it mister. And speak to us about it. It is beyond annoying to see a grown umm man, act like a bitchy little girl, hiding behind a theoligical one-liner, causing naturally born gay children pain and suicide. At least Chambers is a mature man with integrity and honesty on his side, not to mention a MUCH higher IQ than the money hungry Bennett clan. There ya go bi-guy, you’re busted.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today in History, 1610: Virginia Colony Enacts North America's First Sodomy Statute

Today In History, 1983: Pat Buchanan Says AIDS Is Nature's "Awful Retribution"

Today In History, 1988: Britain Enacts Section 28

Padres Finally Respond to Gay Men's Chorus Debacle

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1920: Harvard Establishes Secret Court To Investigate "This Pernicious Scourge"

Today In History, 1975: LAPD Chief Declines Gay Pride Invite, Proposes "Gay Conversion Week" Instead

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.