What does Focus on the Family do when they get caught in a lie? They tell three more.
July 3rd, 2007
We reported last week about Focus on the Family’s strange ability to see into the future when they reported — using the past tense — about the Ex-Gay Survivor’s Conference when it hadn’t occurred yet.
Well, they don’t like being called out as liars, so they are trying to defend their report. But CitizenLink associate editor Jennifer Mesko ends up digging the hole even deeper:
The article I wrote on Thursday included this line about the Exodus conference: “The meeting, which began Tuesday and wraps up Sunday, has drawn close to 1,000 people – and no protesters so far. Across town, a counter-conference drew about 100 people.”
Apparently miffed at the reference to “100 people,” [Ex-Gay Watch’s David] Roberts accused me of “supplying attendance figures seemingly out of thin air.” But I got the numbers from reliable people who attended both conferences – although their thinness is not a matter of record. [emphasis mine]
You see, she’s lying again. She admits that she wrote the article Thursday. That’s June 28th by my calendar. The conference didn’t start until Friday June 29th. I should know. I actually did attend both conferences, but I couldn’t say that until the evening of the twenty-ninth — more than twenty-four hours after her miraculous past-tense reporting.
That’s the same point David Roberts made at Ex-gay Watch, a point that Mesko utterly ignores.
So yes, she’s outright lying. Her “reliable people” simply couldn’t have “attended both conferences” when she wrote her story because the second conference hadn’t ocurred yet. Either she’s lying or her “reliable people” are lying, in which case they aren’t terribly reliable.
And so you see, since the conference hadn’t occurred yet, there is only one source her attendance figures could have possibly come from — thin air. Any associate editor who doesn’t have the simplest ability to check her facts should reconsider her occupational choice.
Ah, but it doesn’t end there. She cites this photo as proof that there were only “50 smiling counter-conferees.” Go ahead and click on the picture to get the full size version. Can you make out the little green dots on the badges? I know it’s hard to see, but look anyway.
Like at the Exodus conference, there was a strict rule at the Ex-Gay Survivor’s conference: only those who gave their permission to be photographed were photographed. Those who didn’t, weren’t. The green dots on the badges meant that they were giving their permission. Not everyone sported a green dot. No green dot, no photo. Mesko’s “reliable people” somehow missed that.
And besides that, the photo was taken at the end of the day. Many had left by then, including Mesko’s “reliable friends” and the other handful of people from Exodus who attended the Ex-Gay Survivor’s conference. By the way, I don’t think any of the visitors from the Exodus conference had green dots on their badges.
But of course, Mesko’s “reliable people” didn’t see that either. Maybe because they weren’t there. They must have gone to some other “counter-conference” that took place on June 28th, but I wouldn’t know which conference that was. After all, it was a full day before the Ex-Gay Survivor’s Conference.
Now, you’d think I’d be finished with Ms. Mesko, wouldn’t you? But you’d be wrong. There’s one last thing:
Other bloggers claimed the conference (which resembled, but was not a counter-conference), scored close to 1,000 people.
This is the first I’ve seen anyone claim that figure. I challenge Mesko to find any serious blogger who says there were anything close to 1,000. MySpace and Friendsters don’t count.
How many attended? I don’t know. I haven’t seen any figures. But I’d guess that probably something more than a hundred, maybe something less that 150. Beyond that, it’s a guess. (Update: Peterson Toscano says they counted about 175. Christine Bakke has even more attendance info. It looks like our little conference was nearly three times the size of the first Exodus conference.)
My own little workshop alone, one of three taking place concurrently, outdrew Exodus’s first conference. They drew only sixty-two people according to Exodus’s official history pamphlet I bought at their conference. Not bad for a first effort.
Mesko says this:
As Christian journalists, we adhere as best we can to truth and accuracy. But many of those on the other side of the issues we fight – particularly bloggers – aren’t guided by those principles.
Bloggers can post whatever they want, whenever they want. I admit, it often seems credible. They seem like real journalists. Only without the degree. Without the editors. Without the accountability.
Standards of truth and accuracy would mean that if you’re going to write about a conference that already happened, you’d actually wait for it to happen already. Not a full day before it even started. That’s a pretty fundamental standard. Apparently Ms. Mesko thinks Christian journalists aren’t guided by those principles.
Jennifer Mesko can post whatever she wants, whenever she wants. But the more she posts the less credible she becomes. These Christian journalists could probably stand to have a different editor. A real editor. With accountability. And maybe even an ounce of integrety.
Hat tip: Scott H.
Focus on the Family Associate Editor Protests Being Corrected, by David Roberts, at Ex-Gay Watch.
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.