The Baptist Standard calls out Texas Baptists on their hypocrisy
Canada's Anglicans oppose Uganda's 'Kill Gays' bill
Gillibrand, a willing ally
A review of the Manhattan Declaration
NJ Democrats Wiggle and Waffle
NOM's biblical Illiteracy
Texas kid beaten with metal pole, entirely preventable
Austria gets civil partnerships
Featured Reports
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
Posts 
Posts via daily email:
John
August 27th, 2007 | LINK
I don’t know which is more upsetting: that this decorated paratrooper was expelled under a stupid law or that another gay military man tattled on him to a superior officer. Argh.
Emily K
August 27th, 2007 | LINK
It’s like having a criminal convicted but punishing the prosecutor instead.
Emily K
August 27th, 2007 | LINK
Also, what the hell happened to the “Don’t Ask” part of DADT??? If gays aren’t talking, who the hell is asking? Shouldn’t that other gay soldier not have said anything? Shouldn’t he NOT have asked? Why is what he did acceptable under DADT??
Lynn David
August 27th, 2007 | LINK
I too don’t get it. If the bar is not “off limits” then what motivation can there be for asking him? The “spurned” soldier’s report? What the hell was he doing in the bar? Being in a gay bar doesn’t provide credible evidence that a “service member has engaged in homosexual conduct.” Especially if he spurned anothers advances. And thus the commander had no real reason to ask Miller.
Ok, now I read the full newspaper report. Miller was I imagine either fed up or stupid…. or both. He should have just shut up. Why he made himself into a martyr is beyond me, but like I said he may have taken more than he could stand in the military and just didn’t give a damn.
Next time, just tell your commander he has no credible evidence of “moral malfeasance” and you wouldn’t tell him whether or not you were straight. And if the commander considers it to be credible evidence then it should occur only after a hearing in which you are represented by a lawyer to review said evidence against the DADT law is allowed.
That’ll probably get you booted anyway though.
Bill Perdue
August 27th, 2007 | LINK
We ought to support the civil and legal rights of gays and lesbians swindled into joining the armed forces, but not give an inch on supporting the illegal use of the American military in places like Iraq/Afganistan and Vietnam/Cambodia.
Perhaps it wasn’t always so but service in the US military isn’t anything to be proud of and we should be encouraging gays and lesbians to stay out.
Last week George Bush’s brain, Karl Rove, took a hike it unhinged him. Now he WANTS to draw the parallels between Vietnam and Iraq.
In place of his lies here is the truth about those blood-spattered wars and what service in the US armed forces means.
American politicians from both parties initiated and supported US military aggression and are entirely responsible for the death tolls in Vietnam and Iraq and the civil wars that erupt in the wake of the ferocious disruption of US military violence.
Vietnam was criminally invaded by a Democrat ‘peace’ President and Congress with Republican complicity. The Vietnam War was based on a campaign of lies by LBJ’s administration. Nixon continued LBJ’s lies and policies until the US military was decisively defeated by obstinate Vietnamese resistance, American antiwar sentiment and a sea change of sentiment in the draftee Army.
Most of the young draftees were against the war and what they did next changed everything. Active duty antiwar groups formed in the states and uniformed soldiers and sailors marched in demonstrations with civilians and vets. In Vietnam itself another surprising kind of escalation began. The antiwar sentiment in Vietnam escalated into from anger to rage to fraggings, eventually a lot of them, and then to individual and group mutinies. Finally a prevalent ‘lack of proper fighting spirit’ led to abortive military operations.
It ended when Nixon and the Pentagon brass reared their army would crumble. Nixon declared ‘victory’ and began a pullout. At the very end they had one final magnificent offensive which didn’t slow down until the Generals and Admirals reached San Diego soon after April 30th, 1975.
The invasion and escalations in Iraq are the responsibility of a Republican administration and Congress with Democrat collusion, including that of Hillary Clinton, poised to replay the Nixon role if she wins.
Keep in mind though that a Democrat victory is far from assured. They repeated the same mistake after the 2004 and 2006 elections and refused to take a stand for the immediate and total withdrawal of US troops. The usual treachery followed and they’ve done nothing but whine that their hands are tied. On August 22, 2007, a Gallup poll said that the Congressional approval rate is the lowest it’s been since 1974. Barely 18% approve of the actions of the Congress while 76% disapprove. The poll was taken from August 13-16, 2007. Even George Bush has a higher rating!
You only need to know three things about these wars.
They’re wars led and backed by Democrats and Republicans. The bvast majority of Americans don’t apporve and had no voice.
They’re needless, unlawful wars based on lies. If Hitler, Goebbels, Goering. Keitel and von Ribbentrop were war criminals what does that make Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove and Powell?
They’re costly wars. Vietnam resulted in the probable deaths of over a million civilians but they were dying too fast to count. 58,219 GI’s died and 153,356 wounded. The criminal invasion of Iraq has killed many tens of thousands of civilians but like Vietnam an accurate civilian death toll is not to be had. As of today 3,725 GI’s are dead with 15,166 wounded and tossed back into combat. A further 12,340 GI’s have devastating wounds. Like Vietnam, their medical care is poor, their lives are shattered, and many will end up on the streets where veterans of Vietnam and Gulf One can give them survival tips.
Although the war is enormously costly and it’s inflation will smolder through the economy for a decade or so, like it did after Vietnam, it’s the dead and wounded who must be our first priority. How many more will fall before we build a movement powerful enough to force an end to it.
David
August 28th, 2007 | LINK
I recommend that Bill Perdue take his head from out of his rear end. That way he can make sensible comments to post rather than rattling off nonsense.
Leave A Comment