Decorated Paratrooper Booted Under DADT

Jim Burroway

August 27th, 2007

Via the SLDN’s Frontlines, the Stockton Record reports on Randy Miller, an army paratrooper who loved the armey, loved serving the country, and loved following in the footsteps of his late father, his mother and stepfather:

During the one year and 361 days that Miller served in the Army, he earned two Army Achievement Medals and a Combat Infantryman Badge. He voluntarily sought out the dangerous assignment of a paratrooper, making 22 jumps.

He was injured during one of his training jumps, although he didn’t realize it at the time. He went to Iraq with A Company, 1st Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 82nd Airborne. After he returned to the US, an MRI showed that the tear in his knee had quadrupled. But his army career came to an abrupt end before it could be treated:

He said he was in a known gay bar minding his own business when a male soldier made him a sexual proposition, which he rejected. The rejected soldier reported Miller to a superior, and Miller was subsequently called in. He didn’t lie. He admitted he was gay.

Miller showed a great deal of integrity in refusing to lie. Unfortunately, “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” leaves soldiers open to retaliation and blackmail. A lesser soldier might lie (or worse) to protect his career. Doesn’t anyone else think we leave our armed forces exposed when men and women of integrity are booted while others remain in the services?

John

August 27th, 2007

I don’t know which is more upsetting: that this decorated paratrooper was expelled under a stupid law or that another gay military man tattled on him to a superior officer. Argh.

Emily K

August 27th, 2007

It’s like having a criminal convicted but punishing the prosecutor instead.

Emily K

August 27th, 2007

Also, what the hell happened to the “Don’t Ask” part of DADT??? If gays aren’t talking, who the hell is asking? Shouldn’t that other gay soldier not have said anything? Shouldn’t he NOT have asked? Why is what he did acceptable under DADT??

Lynn David

August 27th, 2007

I too don’t get it. If the bar is not “off limits” then what motivation can there be for asking him? The “spurned” soldier’s report? What the hell was he doing in the bar? Being in a gay bar doesn’t provide credible evidence that a “service member has engaged in homosexual conduct.” Especially if he spurned anothers advances. And thus the commander had no real reason to ask Miller.

Ok, now I read the full newspaper report. Miller was I imagine either fed up or stupid…. or both. He should have just shut up. Why he made himself into a martyr is beyond me, but like I said he may have taken more than he could stand in the military and just didn’t give a damn.

Next time, just tell your commander he has no credible evidence of “moral malfeasance” and you wouldn’t tell him whether or not you were straight. And if the commander considers it to be credible evidence then it should occur only after a hearing in which you are represented by a lawyer to review said evidence against the DADT law is allowed.

That’ll probably get you booted anyway though.

Bill Perdue

August 27th, 2007

We ought to support the civil and legal rights of gays and lesbians swindled into joining the armed forces, but not give an inch on supporting the illegal use of the American military in places like Iraq/Afganistan and Vietnam/Cambodia.
Perhaps it wasn’t always so but service in the US military isn’t anything to be proud of and we should be encouraging gays and lesbians to stay out.
Last week George Bush’s brain, Karl Rove, took a hike it unhinged him. Now he WANTS to draw the parallels between Vietnam and Iraq.
In place of his lies here is the truth about those blood-spattered wars and what service in the US armed forces means.
American politicians from both parties initiated and supported US military aggression and are entirely responsible for the death tolls in Vietnam and Iraq and the civil wars that erupt in the wake of the ferocious disruption of US military violence.
Vietnam was criminally invaded by a Democrat ‘peace’ President and Congress with Republican complicity. The Vietnam War was based on a campaign of lies by LBJ’s administration. Nixon continued LBJ’s lies and policies until the US military was decisively defeated by obstinate Vietnamese resistance, American antiwar sentiment and a sea change of sentiment in the draftee Army.
Most of the young draftees were against the war and what they did next changed everything. Active duty antiwar groups formed in the states and uniformed soldiers and sailors marched in demonstrations with civilians and vets. In Vietnam itself another surprising kind of escalation began. The antiwar sentiment in Vietnam escalated into from anger to rage to fraggings, eventually a lot of them, and then to individual and group mutinies. Finally a prevalent ‘lack of proper fighting spirit’ led to abortive military operations.
It ended when Nixon and the Pentagon brass reared their army would crumble. Nixon declared ‘victory’ and began a pullout. At the very end they had one final magnificent offensive which didn’t slow down until the Generals and Admirals reached San Diego soon after April 30th, 1975.
The invasion and escalations in Iraq are the responsibility of a Republican administration and Congress with Democrat collusion, including that of Hillary Clinton, poised to replay the Nixon role if she wins.
Keep in mind though that a Democrat victory is far from assured. They repeated the same mistake after the 2004 and 2006 elections and refused to take a stand for the immediate and total withdrawal of US troops. The usual treachery followed and they’ve done nothing but whine that their hands are tied. On August 22, 2007, a Gallup poll said that the Congressional approval rate is the lowest it’s been since 1974. Barely 18% approve of the actions of the Congress while 76% disapprove. The poll was taken from August 13-16, 2007. Even George Bush has a higher rating!
You only need to know three things about these wars.

They’re wars led and backed by Democrats and Republicans. The bvast majority of Americans don’t apporve and had no voice.

They’re needless, unlawful wars based on lies. If Hitler, Goebbels, Goering. Keitel and von Ribbentrop were war criminals what does that make Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove and Powell?

They’re costly wars. Vietnam resulted in the probable deaths of over a million civilians but they were dying too fast to count. 58,219 GI’s died and 153,356 wounded. The criminal invasion of Iraq has killed many tens of thousands of civilians but like Vietnam an accurate civilian death toll is not to be had. As of today 3,725 GI’s are dead with 15,166 wounded and tossed back into combat. A further 12,340 GI’s have devastating wounds. Like Vietnam, their medical care is poor, their lives are shattered, and many will end up on the streets where veterans of Vietnam and Gulf One can give them survival tips.
Although the war is enormously costly and it’s inflation will smolder through the economy for a decade or so, like it did after Vietnam, it’s the dead and wounded who must be our first priority. How many more will fall before we build a movement powerful enough to force an end to it.

David

August 28th, 2007

I recommend that Bill Perdue take his head from out of his rear end. That way he can make sensible comments to post rather than rattling off nonsense.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.