NOM Commits Sodomy
The Daily Agenda for Saturday, February 11
The Daily Agenda for Friday, February 10
Again anti-gays blindly and gleefully shoot themselves in the foot
Rep. Walsh leads with her heart
Advocate, WaPo, AP Get it Wrong On Anti-Homosexuality Bill
Uganda Executive, Parliament Tussle Over Anti-Homosexuality BIll
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, February 9
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 450 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
Posts 
Posts via daily email:
Ben in oakland
November 21st, 2007 | LINK
It’s their proven fund-raiser and power magnet. Consistency is the hobgoblin of the very small mind. At some point, they will figure out that it is working less and less for them, but no time soon. Unfortunately, that obsession with what my genitalia are doing instead of something that is actually important is slowly pulling our country into the mire. We all pay for that.
Michael
November 21st, 2007 | LINK
Out of curiosity, I just visited these pages for myself and made an odd realization. As a someone who would never normally visit such a site, I had just increased the view-count of their homosexuality related websites. I wonder how much that top ten list is affected by people like me.
Either way, it certainly makes the website look like a joke if not one of their other articles merit a position in the top ten list.
Ben in oakland
November 21st, 2007 | LINK
I just went and looked at one of their rEferences in the homosexuality and domestic violence page. I was looking for Cameronesque references and studies. Imagine my surprise when i saw a study for Canada. I didn’t study every last word, but as far as I can tell, it doesn’t say what they say it says–AT ALL.
I’m shocked, shocked!!!! Good christians and honest republicans would not MISPLACE EMPHASIS,LIE, FABRICATE, DISTORT, OR DELIBERATELY MISCONSTRUE on something that has to do with gay people, right? God is on their side, and endows the rightness of their cause with his holiness. OUTRIGHT LIES, FABRICATIONS, AND DISTORTIONS have no place in a holy campaign.
It must be the islamofascist/terrorists/fags who have hacked their website and placed what appear to be FABRICATIONS and DISTORTIONS on it.
Crocodile Caucus » Wednesday Tidbits
November 21st, 2007 | LINK
[...] Conservapedia are more obsessed with teh gay than I am. [...]
Zeke
November 21st, 2007 | LINK
Wow, I knew they were obsessed but that graphic is really an eye opener as to just HOW obsessed they really are.
No wonder so many of them turn out to be closeted homos and no wonder they believe that a person can be “turned” gay or “recruited”. With the non-stop gay obsession and the regular exposures of closeted perverts at the highest ranks of their regime, how could they not come to such a ridiculous conclusion?
Emily K
November 21st, 2007 | LINK
lol, I just checked and “Gay Bowel Syndrome” is at No. 5. Woo!
Suricou Raven
November 22nd, 2007 | LINK
Ben: They have worse articles. I used to tease them, but I was eventually banned from editing after I stated that the speed of light was approximatly 3E8 meters per second. One of the admins believes that light actually travels much, much faster (How else could we see objects more then 6000ly away?), so banned me for making an ‘unsourced claim.’
I replied by refering to a paper by Maxwell that (I think, I cant understand the math) calculates exactly what the speed of light should be. The same admin removed the reference.
Emproph
November 22nd, 2007 | LINK
There’s an interesting convo going on at BoingBoing about this. One of the commenters linked here:
(By Stephanie Simon, Los Angeles Times (via Seattle Times))
So the son of one of the most virulently anti-gay founders of the entire anti-gay industry is responsible for founding Conservapedia.
Patrick
November 22nd, 2007 | LINK
Doesn’t she also have a gay son?
Ben in oakland
November 22nd, 2007 | LINK
She does. His name is John. She has stated that she loves her son. I wonder what they’re thanksgiving dinner is like? I wonder if she allows John’s dieased, perverted partner (if he has one) to show. How does andy relate to them?
Tara
November 22nd, 2007 | LINK
When John Schlafly was outed, he said gays don’t need nondiscrimination laws in employment and housing. I guess I wouldn’t either, if my employer and landlord both happened to be my mommy!
Ben in oakland
November 22nd, 2007 | LINK
I was going to say that, but since I don’t know him personally, I thought it might soud, well, catty. :)
Gotcha!
November 22nd, 2007 | LINK
Wouldn’t the title of this blog be more descriptive if called Sexual Obsessions of Social Conservatives?
a. mcewen
November 22nd, 2007 | LINK
and it goes without saying that a vast, VAST majority, if not all of their information is wrong
Ben in oakland
November 23rd, 2007 | LINK
It’s not information. It’s propaganda.
Emproph
November 23rd, 2007 | LINK
“Conservapedia, propaganda you can trust.”
Ben in oakland
November 23rd, 2007 | LINK
Can you be propergander if you’re gay as a goose?
Emproph
November 23rd, 2007 | LINK
Sure, haven’t you ever heard of transproperganderism?
Emily K
November 24th, 2007 | LINK
except republicans actually WANT transpropaganders protected under hate crimes laws.
Ben in oakland
November 25th, 2007 | LINK
I think you people are making fun of conservapedia.
Joel
November 25th, 2007 | LINK
Its quite apparent that conservapedia a trustworthy source, now college students will be able to cite conservapedia in their bibliographies, unlike wikipedia. Not to mention conservapedia is absolutely unbiased.
“I think you people are making fun of conservapedia.”
Hell no!
Emily K
November 25th, 2007 | LINK
My question to Conservapedia is, “How can you claim to be ‘unbiased’ in your political slant if the word ‘conservative’ is literally in your very title??”
Emproph
November 26th, 2007 | LINK
Ladies and gentlemen, I think we have a winner. Let the mocking commence.
Actually Emily, that got me thinking, and apparently I didn’t have to go further than the front page to find a link to their “Examples of Bias in Wikipedia” page.
I wish I had time to go through this stuff. 86 examples of Wikipedia “bias.” I couldn’t resist #86.
“In an example of pro-homosexuality bias, the category allowing users to self identify as Heterosexual was deleted because it served no useful purpose, yet the exact same category for Homosexuals was kept.”
__
Note: There are hundreds of categories on the “Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Archive/June 2007″ page, some kept, some deleted.
Some of those categories include:
9.2 Category:Wikipedians who drive cars
9.7 Category:Wikipedians who would like to learn more languages
9.8 Category:Wikipedians who visit countries and child cats
9.17 Category:Wikipedians who listen to Madonna
9.24 Category:Wikipedians who can solve a Rubik’s Cube
You can scroll to the top from either of the Wiki links above to see them all.
Matt
December 26th, 2008 | LINK
There’s a big difference between disagreeing with homosexuality and obsessing over it like those wackos do.
Leave A Comment