Announcing the Cameronesque Award: The Christian Defense Coalition

Jim Burroway

December 12th, 2007

A lot of groups and individuals put out piles of misrepresented statistics and bogus research. Few can match Paul Cameron’s audacity, but from time to time we run across something that surely must put a smile on Cameron’s lips. One such email blast reached my inbox yesterday, and it was so good I thought it might be time to inaugurate a brand new award.

The Cameronesque AwardAnd so I’m announcing the Cameronesque Award, given for the individual or group who engages in the most egregious manipulation, misuse, or misrepresentation of research or statistics that would make Paul Cameron proud.

For the first winner of this brand new award, I chose the Christian Defense Coalition. Headed by Rev. Pat Mahoney, the Christian Defense Coalition was formed to advocate on behalf of Terri Shiavo’s parents, and they’ve been involved with conservative Christian politics ever since. Yesterday, they put out a blaring press release claiming that the “shootings in Colorado highlight the fact that Christians and churches are the overwhelming target of hate crimes in America.”

Did you get that? Christians and churches are the “overwhelming target” of hate crimes in America. Not blacks, not gays, not Jews. Christians.

The Christian Defense Coalition goes on, citing statistics from the National Burned Churches Coalition:

For example, between 1997 and 2007 there were 3,500 acts of either arson, attempted arson, bombings and suspicious fires at churches according to the National Coalition for Burned Churches.

The group also reports that 600 churches were subjected to arson alone between 2000 and 2006.

The National Burned Churches Coalition was founded in 1997 in the wake of several church fires that occurred in the South. Since then, they’ve provided valuable aid and advice to churches recovering from arson, bombing or vandalism, and they do research for crime prevention. The NBCC does genuinely good work.

But not all of the acts that the NBCC tracks were hate crimes. According to their web site, some of these churches are damaged or vandalized as part of common criminal activity, and some are targeted by teens “just for the thrill of it.”

Don’t get me wrong. The NBCC is filling a legitimate need. But not all of the churches they assist were victims of hate crimes. And the NBCC doesn’t get involved with acts of hate directed at other groups. That simply is not their mission, which means it’s not possible to put their data into perspective against what other groups experience.

So who does track hate crimes nationwide against all legally-specified categories? Well, the FBI of course. And for 2006, here is what they reported:

Hate Crime Incidents, 2006
Race 4,737 52%
Anti-White 1,008  
Anti-Black 3,136  
Anti-Indian/Alaskan Native 72  
Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander 230  
Multiple Groups/Other 291  
Religion 1,597 18%
Anti-Jewish 1,027  
Anti-Catholic 81  
Anti-Protestant 62  
Anti-Islamic 191  
Anti-Other 140  
Multiple groups 88  
Anti-Atheist/Agnostic 8  
Sexual Orientation 1,415 16%
Anti-Male Homosexual 881  
Anti-Female Homosexual 192  
Anti-Homosexual 293  
Anti-Heterosexual 28  
Anti-Bisexual 21  
Ethnicity 1,233 14%
Anti-Hispanic 770  
Other 483  
Disability 94 1%
TOTAL 9,076 100%*
Percentages don’t add to
100% due to rounding errors.

Now the Christian Defense Coalition ignored the FBI data altogether. Using the NBCC data, they complained:

Most would believe that the groups or facilities most likely to be targets of hate crimes are persons of color, gays, Muslims or abortion clinics. The reason for that is the national press, media, elected officials and special interest groups focus, dramatize and over report when those groups and facilities are subjected to violent acts.

But let’s look at the FBI’s data, which is the only source for statistics of hate crimes against all of these groups (except abortion clinics). If you add the anti-Protestant and anti-Catholic reports of hate crime incidents, you’ll find that there were 143 hate crimes reported against Christian groups or individuals.

That’s a lower figure than for every other group that the Christian Defense Coalition mentions. That figure is minuscule compared to the 3,136 anti-Black hate crime incidents. It’s even blown away by the 1,008 anti-White hate crime incidents. It’s also tiny compared to the 1,366 combined anti-homosexual hate crime incidents and the 1,027 anti-Jewish hate crime incidents. It’s even lower than the 191 anti-Muslim hate crime incidents. In fact, even Asians and Pacific Islanders experience more hate crime incidents that Christians — and Christians make up the majority of the U.S. population!

A lot of people are lining up to exploit the Colorado shootings to advance their agenda. Monday, we cited the Family “Research” Council’s Tony Perkin’s craven attack on the “secular media.” Today we have the Christian Defense Coalition trying to dress their claims with meaningless statistics. I have a feeling that somewhere in Colorado Springs, Cameron is smiling.

cooner

December 12th, 2007

Funny how the conservative/Republican/right-wing/etc. types can be all up-in-arms about how prosecuting hate-crimes is such a bad, unfair, liberal-bleeding-heart thing to do, UNLESS they are (or can position themselves as) the target of such hate-crimes.

Then again, it’s alright for them to be anti-gay, unless you’re a Republican vice president with a lesbian daughter. Or against stem cell research, unless you’re a former Republican president’s wife whose husband suffered Alzheimer’s. Or tough-on-drugs, unless you’re a right-wing talk radio giant who had a little run-in with a pain killer addiction. Or be all for family values, except when you’re on your third marriage. And so on.

There’s an old saying that “a liberal is a conservative who’s never been mugged.” Maybe a conservative is just a liberal who hasn’t had one of life’s little problems disrupt their routine yet.

David

December 13th, 2007

Actually, cooner, the really funny thing is how liberal-progressive/Democrat/left-wing/etc. types — like yourself — enjoy turning stories like this one into something they’re not in order to criticize the ideological opposition for positions they don’t hold.

The Christian Defense Coalition media advisory at Christian Newswire says nothing whatsoever about the prosecution of hate crimes, nor does it deal with the controversies surrounding hate crimes laws.

There certainly are reactionary religious types that are hypocritical when it comes to hate crimes and other acts of bigotry, but there isn’t anything in the Coalition’s statement to show that they are such types.

As for the conservative position on hate crimes, it isn’t that such crimes should not be prosecuted; it is that certain motives for a crime shouldn’t be elevated above others as deserving of greater punishment.

Jason

December 14th, 2007

A classic misunderstanding.

Hate Crimes legislation is designed to prosecute someone using one crime (arson, theft, murder) to commit another crime (assault, harassment, intimidation) against the victim, and or the group the victim belongs to. It has nothing whatsoever to do with criminalizing thought or motivation.

Zeke

December 19th, 2007

UCC churches are being targeted across for vandalism across the country. My church was vandalized, as was a local liberal Catholic Church. These churches were not vandalized by anti-Christian atheist they were vandalized by radical fundamentalists who are angry about the liberal and progressive positions (gay affirming, anti-war, anti-greed) of progressive congregations.

As far as the black church burnings in the south, again these crimes were not committed by people who hate Christianity or religion. They are committed by people who claim TO BE Christians, but who hold very unchristian views on treating our neighbors (ALL our neighbors, black, jewish, muslim, gay, immigrant, poor, etc.) as ourselves.

So even their whining about being victims is a red herring. They are usually victims of their own “Christian” brothers and sisters.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1964: "Homosexuality In America"

Today In History, 1965: Gay Rights Advocates Picket the Civil Service Commission

Today In History, 2003: U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Nation's Sodomy Laws

Today In History, 2013: U.S. Supreme Court Declares Defense of Marriage Act Unconstitutional

Today In History, 2013: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Appeal of California's Prop 8

Today In History, 2015: U.S. Supreme Court Legalizes Marriage Equality Nationwide

Born On This Day, 1951: Lance Loud

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.