"Not Guilty, Not Ashamed, and Not Finished"
Anti-gay general's comments infuriate the Dutch
ENDA Sit-ins Result in Arrests in DC and San Francisco
Anti-Gay Group Sells Snakeoil
Schumer Argues for LGBT Incusion in Immigration Reform
Ex-Gay Ministry Admits Sexual Abuse; Grateful At Not Being Found Out
Lt. Daniel Choi Arrested In DADT Protest At White House
Another Baptist church not anti-gay enough for Texas
Featured Reports
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than two hundred posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Jason D
April 2nd, 2008 | LINK
would this not qualify as slander/libel — the fact that they’re taking these allegations seriously considering there is no evidence?
Johno
April 2nd, 2008 | LINK
He should sue, absolutely. Though he probably won’t if it will jeopardize his political hopes. This story makes me nauseous.
On a side note, I just wanted to say thank you very much, BTB, for the Testing the Premise article and for keeping it and other vital information linked on the front page. I have linked to these articles more times than I can count in various discussions.
bananie
April 2nd, 2008 | LINK
“Federal law does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, said Stacey L. Sobel, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania who specializes in issues related to and advocates for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.”
this is absolutely frightening to me.
Joel
April 2nd, 2008 | LINK
“Commissioners were initially slated to discuss the issue privately, but Mr. Nichols requested the proceeding take place in public.
“It’s my fundamental belief that your public life and your private life are separate,” Mr. Nichols said. “It’s amazing that we’re having this debate in 2008.”
”
So he considers this flawed charade vs him a public thing… I would say it was more of a private matter(between the accusers and myself). Guess it is OBVIOUS its part of his public life, *shrug.
cooner
April 2nd, 2008 | LINK
I dunno, Joel. If his accusers are threatening both his job and his candidacy, that’s not very private.
I haven’t read the story extensively beyond this tidbit here, but I would guess if he chose a public proceeding rather than a private one it was probably to put the unfairness and lunacy on display for everyone to see, rather than letting it get swept under the rug.
If I were accused of being a child molester, I think I’d want the opportunity to both prove my innocence and, if possible, publicly expose whoever made the charade of an accusation. *shrug*
Leo
April 2nd, 2008 | LINK
I didn’t think anything on the web was truly anonymous. I’ve got to believe they could.
That’s what they should be investigating.
Leo
April 2nd, 2008 | LINK
Boy I screwed up that post.
What I meant to say is, couldn’t they trace the source of the e-mails?
Leave A Comment