Paul Cameron Testifies As “Expert Witness”

Jim Burroway

April 24th, 2008

We were able to obtain a copy of Paul Cameron’s March newsletter from one of our favorite readers. And it looks like he’s still capable of quite a bit of dangerous mischief:

I was invited as an expert witness to present evidence as to why one state’s use of homosexuals as foster parents should be halted. Since a continuance was issued at the court hearing, I’ll keep you informed of further developments.

I received a tip which suggests that his testimony may have been in Beckley, West Virginia. According to that tip, a lesbian couple have been providing foster care for children in Fayette county for several years. Apparently, they and/or the WV Department of Health and Human Resources are being sued to force the removal of all the children from their home.

Cameron, of course, is utterly incapable of telling the truth no matter what oath he may have taken. In 1985 he was censured by Judge Jerry Buchmeyer of the U.S. District Court of Dallas, who wrote:

Dr. Paul Cameron…has himself made misrepresentations to this Court … There has been no fraud or misrepresentations except by Dr. Cameron.

Since then, he’s been kicked out of the American Pshychological Association, and he’s been reprimanded by the Nebraska Psychological Association, the American Sociological Association, and more recently, the Eastern Psychological Association. All of this is for his continued and persistent ethical violations and for getting caught in boldfaced lies.

If anyone knows where Cameron might have testified or the particulars of the court case, please let me know either in the comments or by email.

Joel

April 24th, 2008

“We were able to obtain a copy of Paul Cameron’s March newsletter from one of our favorite readers. And it looks like he’s still capable of quite a bit of dangerous mischief:

I was invited as an expert witness to present evidence as to why one state’s use of homosexuals as foster parents should be halted. Since a continuance was issued at the court hearing, I’ll keep you informed of further developments.

Ohh a newsletter, ill be sure to sign up for it.
Anyways, why would a court even listen to such an ‘expert’ if “In 1985 he was censured by Judge Jerry Buchmeyer of the U.S. District Court of Dallas, who wrote:

Dr. Paul Cameron…has himself made misrepresentations to this Court … There has been no fraud or misrepresentations except by Dr. Cameron”

Was is also related to gay misrepresentation? And if so… does the court not learn? Also… isnt fraud punishble by law. Did he get prison time or an ‘outrageous’ fine?

CPT_Doom

April 25th, 2008

Joel, IIRC, the court did not feel they could charge Cameron with criminal fraud, but I believe he was disqualified from ever testifying as an expert in that district again. If that is indeed the case, it would be powerful evidence against any testimony in this case. Let us hope the opposing counsel has some knowledge of this.

Brady

April 25th, 2008

I get that the courts are going to allow people to testify, even if their past is shady, but why would anyone ever ask him to testify? They’re just asking to get torched on cross. Could the lawyers that hired Cameron really not know about his past problems? That’s the only explanation I can come up with.

Joel

April 25th, 2008

“Joel, IIRC, the court did not feel they could charge Cameron with criminal fraud, but I believe he was disqualified from ever testifying as an expert ”
Ok… i dont knwo the way of the law but.. this comes at me as kind of a contradiction.

He was disqualified for misrepresenting and lieing, no? Up to what i know if you lie under oath it IS punishible. SO the only reason he was not criminially charged was because he did not lie… and thus he didnt really misrepresent, so… why exactly(if he was) did they disqualify him?

John

April 25th, 2008

Joel wrote: “He was disqualified for misrepresenting and lieing, no? Up to what i know if you lie under oath it IS punishible. SO the only reason he was not criminially charged was because he did not lie… and thus he didnt really misrepresent, so… why exactly(if he was) did they disqualify him?”

There are many reasons that people who commit a crime might not be charged. Cameron’s lies in general are convoluted and involve the deliberate manipulation of data in order to come to predetermined conclusions. He knows exactly what he is doing, and it is deliberate. Although to a judge this might be pretty clear, presenting a case like this to a jury might be rather difficult, and not worth the effort. A reasonable remedy in that sort of situation would be to ban him from testifying in the future. Should he want to appeal that, he would face the very uphill challenge of explaining his behavior to another judge or panel of judges.

CPT_Doom

April 28th, 2008

He was disqualified for misrepresenting and lieing, no? Up to what i know if you lie under oath it IS punishible. SO the only reason he was not criminially charged was because he did not lie… and thus he didnt really misrepresent, so… why exactly(if he was) did they disqualify him?

To echo John, from what I can remember, Cameron is pretty good at not actually lying under oath, but still misleading the court. If you think of how he misuses others’ work, somehow coming to the exact opposite conclusions of the original researchers, but using the same data, it stands to reason he did something similar.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Morelos Lawmakers Approve Constitutional Changes To Enact Marriage Equality

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1969: New York Dailies Take Their First Stab At Stonewall

Born On This Day, 1892: Henry Gerber

Social Conservatives In Morelos Mobilize To Block Marriage Equality

Federal Court Re-opens Marriage Equality Case Over Mississippi's "Religious Freedom" Law

Morelos On the Cusp Of Enacting Marriage Equality

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.