The Dishonesty of Elaine Donnelly

Timothy Kincaid

May 1st, 2008

elainesux.jpgElaine Donnelly has made it her life’s mission to return the military to the 1930’s. Through her Center for Military Readiness, she agitates against gays in the military and women in combat.

While gay people make her shudder, women are grudgingly acceptable in the service – as long as they don’t fight. It’s just not very lady-like, ya know.

But while Donnelly actively campaigns to reduce equal opportunities for women in the Military Service, you’d never know that from her new anti-gay campaign. On her new website established “build an online army” to fight against “gay activists”, there’s no reference to Donnelly’s hostility towards “Pentagon feminists” or any other anti-woman policies she espouses.

Instead, Donnelly states her purpose as “Support for Military Men and Women“. [emphasis mine]

Perhaps she realizes that being both anti-woman and anti-gay may seem just a little too hateful even for those who might support her agenda of restricting the Military to heterosexuals.

And like so many anti-gays, Elaine Donnelly has given up even the slightest shred of integrity she may have ever held. To Donnelly truth is subjective and honesty inconvenient.

See Also:
Personal Cruelty
Time Magazine Relies on Non-Representative Poll Pushed by Anti-Gay Activist
More Evidence that DADT is Dead
American Family Association Picks Up The “Ailing General” Theme

L. Junius Brutus

May 1st, 2008

Because of bigots like Elaine Donnelly, the military has to make exemptions for sex offenders, even child molesters. I don’t hear her about that. But God forbid that anyone who is gay is allowed to serve, what a tragedy that would be!

bhamgay

May 1st, 2008

Is it just me…or does this women look terribly constipated?

Regan DuCasse

May 1st, 2008

A young woman who is a medical engineer, just got awarded the Silver Star for her SHEROICS in combat. During a fire fight, she even threw her body protectively over a fellow soldier.

Some people are really taking it for granted that women and gay men aren’t brave in combat.
Donnelly is an embarssment to her own gender by not supporting women in combat.
Perhaps she’s projecting, we know that even in a political conflict, she’d rather throw women and gay soldiers under a bus, then have any bravery with regard to equal service for all it’s members who have the skills.
What a B**ch!

a. mcewen

May 1st, 2008

I would like to know what’s Ms. Donnelly’s expertise and who is funding her.

Scott

May 2nd, 2008

Fascinating that homophobia and mysogyny are fellow travelers with the authoritarian crowd. She shows scratch a mysogynist find a homophobe.

Jason D

May 2nd, 2008

Scott, it shouldn’t be that surprising, homophobia and mysogyny go hand in hand, they are fraternal twins.

A poor view of women and their roles in society, leads to an unhealthy view of gay men, since stigma and simplistic reasoning pretty much state that gay men are little more than women with penises and not “real” men. Simplistic dogma implies and states that men = good and women = not as good.
If you feel women are inferior, anyone who assumes “the woman’s role” sexually and or socially, is considered to be degrading onself.

Men who see women as equals, deserving of equal pay, equal rights, and equal voice in society tend to have no problem with homosexuality.

Pepe Johnson

May 2nd, 2008

What would Ms. Donnelly say about MAJ Alan G. Rogers? He was killed when an IED exploded in Iraq. Because of him, two soldiers lives were spared. And he was gay.

What would have happened had MAJ Rogers not been present? I hope that someone would have done the same as him. Actually I’m sure that someone would have. But if he hadn’t been there, and another soldier had died instead, we’d be down two soldiers instead of one. Even the cold, hard mathematics don’t support her position.

Finally how much experience does Ms. Donnelly have as military leader? None. She has never served a day in uniform. Sure, she’s got a right to free speech like everyone, but she seems determined to shut us up.

Scott

May 2nd, 2008

Jason,
Actually I’m NOT shocked about the connection, sadly. However I am net saracasm deficient.

Tim Hulsey

May 2nd, 2008

Is Elaine Donnelly’s website actively dishonest? Certainly the name of her advocacy group is misleading, but that sort of thing is by no means uncommon, especially when a group lobbies on potentially disputatious issues. Examples of advocacy groups with such monikers include “Human Rights Campaign,” “Voters for Marriage” or “Equality [insert state here]”.

Donnelly seems to support women in the military, but not in actual combat. That’s a policy military higher-ups and the Bush administration agree on, and there’s no indication that it will change in the near future. (One wonders what Donnelly does with all that free time.) This is sex discrimination, to be sure, but does it necessarily constitute full-blown misogyny? It seems to me that a real misogynist would advocate dropping topless women soldiers into the middle of Sadr City with blanks in their M16s.

Tim Hulsey

May 2nd, 2008

A young woman who is a medical engineer, just got awarded the Silver Star for her SHEROICS in combat. During a fire fight, she even threw her body protectively over a fellow soldier.

Yes. She was initially rewarded with a transfer to another unit, far away from the combat zone. It was as if the military brass had said, “Exceptional job, soldier — don’t do it again.”

Jim Wates

July 29th, 2008

People like Elaine Donnelly prove the case of devolution in many pockets of the country.

Here is what I want to know… what makes her an expert on the military – as I have never seen a mention of her having any role in the military, in any capacity, a side from her mentally challenged “organization” for promoting policy.

Secondly, why is she such an authority that she is allowed to testify before Congress? She attended (note it doesn’t say graduated) the University of Detroit and Schoolcraft Community College. Are you kidding me? Seriously… I cannot wrap my head around how:
a random moron, with logic that makes my toddler comparable to Einstein, a vocabulary of a 5th grader, and absolutely no first hand knowledge of anything gets a soapbox, on the floor of Congress no less.

This country is full of idiots with really strong opinions, a dangerous combination. I think we all need to stop getting political correct and let people know they are not qualified for making decisions for other people at a early age when their lack of ability to rationalize in a logical manner is evident. Otherwise, this is what you get. People who think they can solve problems by creating disasters.

D’oh!

Elaine Donnelly, a pathetic excuse of for an America and a insult to the human race.

BSM

September 22nd, 2010

God please break that mold : Elaine Donnelly

OK from what I can see she’s just Anita Bryant all over again, but on a new soap box. Spewing her hatred all over TV . I’ve known many that served our country that were gay. Not one of them ever said they had time to check out the other solders. It was more like I’ll cover your back and you cover mine so we make it out of here alive.

…is so unAmerican, for it opposes equality.
And so unChristian, for it’s dripping with judgment and bereft of love.

Don’t let these people on your show it only hurts our soldiers.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Morelos Lawmakers Approve Constitutional Changes To Enact Marriage Equality

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1969: New York Dailies Take Their First Stab At Stonewall

Born On This Day, 1892: Henry Gerber

Social Conservatives In Morelos Mobilize To Block Marriage Equality

Federal Court Re-opens Marriage Equality Case Over Mississippi's "Religious Freedom" Law

Morelos On the Cusp Of Enacting Marriage Equality

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.