Carrie's porn loses her a gig with NJ "family defenders"
Wal-Mart bans gay couple for NOT shoplifting
California Poll: I support marriage but I don't want to vote again
Because She Needed It
The "Biblical" Worldwide Anglican Communion
Namibia Political Parties Hesitantly Supportive
Purdue Professor Spews "An Economic Case Against Homosexuality"
Australian Senate Refuses to Oppose Uganda's "Kill Gays" Bill
Featured Reports
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
Posts 
Posts via daily email:
For the past seven years running, authorities in the former Soviet republic of Moldova’s capital city of Chisinau had banned public Gay Pride celebrations. But a new law on public gatherings appears to have cleared the way for the this year’s “Rainbow over the Dniester” celebration to go forward.
clement
May 9th, 2008 | LINK
LGBT Pride March in the Moldovan capital of Chisinau is banned by the Mayor.
Below is a message from the Moldovan LGBT activists as forwarded to the euro-queer mailing list.
MESSAGE FROM PARTICIPANTS IN THE 7TH MOLDOVAN LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND
TRANSGENDER PRIDE ~SRAINBOW OVER THE DNISTER~T
CHISINAU, MOLDOVA
08 MAY 2008
We, participants of the 7th Moldovan LGBT pride ~SRainbow over the Dniester~T
protest over the decision of the Chisinau city hall to ban the peaceful
public manifestation in support of tolerance an non-discrimination in
Moldovan society, organized by NGO ~SGenderDoc-M~T. The manifestation was
planned for 11th of May 2008 at 11:00 am, and we have decided to proceed
with our plans despite the city hall ban. The latter is unlawful, as
according to Moldovan laws only the court can prohibit a march, and not a
local authority. Moreover, in 2007 the Supreme Court has found a similar
decision of the city hall as violating Constitution and the European
Convention for Human Rights. It is already sixth time that a peaceful LGBT
demonstration is banned in Moldova, despite pressure and criticism of the
Council of Europe, European Union and the Organisation for Security and
Cooperation in Europe.
>From the police, city hall and mass-media we have learned that a number of groups is planning violent attacks on pride participants. We believe that
the unlawful decision of the city hall was designed to shift the
responsibility for any victims of this violence from local authorities and
the police to pride organizers. The actions of the Chisinau city hall and
the police are in violation of the European Convention for Human Rights and
the Universal Declaration for Human Rights, to which Moldovan is a
signatory, as well as other international human rights obligations of the Moldovan state. It is also against the European Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which Moldova has aspirations to join.
We believe that human rights belong to all people, regardless of sexual
orientation and gender identity. Everyone has the right to expression in a public space. We therefore call on Chisinau mayor to withdraw the ban, and
on Moldovan law-enforcement authorities to provide adequate protection to
pride participants.
For more information please visit http://www.gay.md or call GenderDoc-M Executive Director Boris Balanetkii at +37322276094
TRANSLATION OF THE CHISINAU CITY HALL DISPOSITION (ORIGINAL IN ROMANIAN ALSO
ATTACHED):
CHISINAU CITY HALL
DISPOSITION
NR. 321-D FROM 08.05.2008
~SWith regards to prohibiting organization of a public manifestation in the city of Chisinau~T
Based on examination of an advance declaration nr. 162 from 18.04.2008 of
the Information Center GenderDoc-M, taking into consideration information
from the office of the general police commissioner of the city of Chisinau
nr. 2548 from 08.05.2008 about disagreement of religious organizations with regards to allowing the respective manifestation, as well as letters from
school students, dwellers of the city of Chisinau, opinions of public associations and of the citizens, which have appeared on the internet, in
mass media, on the radio and on television, which accuse sexual minorities of aggressiveness and violation of spiritual and moral values, in order to avoid any tensions in society, on the basis of articles 5 (1), art. 6, art. 8 (b), art. 10 (3), art. 16 (1-4), art. 18 (1,2) and art. 19 from the Law of the Republic of Moldova nr. 26 ~V XIV on public manifestations, and ~E the law on local public administration, the Chisinau mayor decides:
- To prohibit organization of a meeting in form of a public action,
solicited by the Information Centre ~SGenderDoc-M~T on 11 May 2008.
- Social-humanitarian and interethnic department (Mrs. Stratulat) to ensure control over execution of this disposition.
General Mayor of Chisinau
Dorin Chirtoaca
LEGAL COMMENT BY GENDERDOC-M
According to the new Moldovan law on public manifestations, local authorities have no right to prohibit a public manifestation. In case they have serious proof that the law will be broken during a public manifestation, they can take organisers of a public manifestation to court, and ONLY the latter can decide to prohibit the manifestation. Therefore this decision has no legal value.
The reasons for prohibition are also clearly limited by the law, and do not
include any reasons given by the city hall in the letter above, except for
violation of public morality. However, as Moldovan courts have already
previously established, GenderDoc-M manifestations are not violating public
morality.
Juris Lavrikovs
Communications Manager
Leave A Comment