McCain Meets With Log Cabin

Timothy Kincaid

June 25th, 2008

Gay Patriot has the scoop:

GayPatriot has exclusively learned that presumptive Republican Presidential nominee Senator John McCain held a personal meeting with the head of the national gay Republicans organization, the Log Cabin Republicans. Log Cabin President Patrick Sammon confirmed his meeting with Senator McCain earlier today.

It is not inconsequential that the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party has met with a leader in the gay community. It suggests that McCain recognizes our community to be a constituency and that we have specific concerns and issues upon which we may be able to find common cause. It also suggests that he is unlikely to be quick to engage in politics based on accusations of “homosexual agenda”.

I hope that Log Cabin is able to get the Senator to clarify his position on certain areas of policy that seem to be nebulous or contradictory. I also hope that the Senator will craft a campaign that actively competes for the votes of gay and lesbian citizens. Such a direction would not only be effective in moving our country closer to equality under law for the members of our community but it would also go far towards healing the rift in the nation caused by culture war and past devisive campaigns.


June 25th, 2008

“Senator McCain has routine personal meetings that are not shown on the Senator’s public schedule…”

Yeah right. Keep telling yourself that.

Translation: McCain meets with gays, but is too cowardly to tell anyone.

He’s basically engaging in the political equivalent of cruising in the back room, and the self-loathers in the LCR are celebrating?

Plus ca change…


June 25th, 2008

“Keating Five” McCain’s record has been overwhelmingly heterosexist. He’s just showing that he believes P.T. Barnum’s truism:

There’s a sucker born every minute.


June 25th, 2008

Awww, this is cute.

Let’s mend fences after McCain is defeated in November. He’s shown himself repeatedly to be willing to pander to pretty much anyone in his desperate bid for the presidency, and he’s changed his positions in the wrong direction repeatedly.

I don’t even care about the gay issues, specifically, this election — there’s far too much at stake. Luckily, the best candidate on all the issues happens to take a more progressive stance toward gays than any candidate up to this point.


June 25th, 2008

What he was probably doing was informing the Log Cabin Republicans that he is going to throw them under the bus. He’s planning to use a two-pronged fear mongering approach to his campaign. To unite the warhawks under his banner: terrorist threats. To unite the fundamentalist morons: Teh Gheys.

He was telling the LCR to shutup and not cause waves or no tax cuts for them.


June 25th, 2008

I would like to ask these commenters how they would react to Obama visiting some gay-rights group. He’s pandered much more than McCain has. Ever listened to his substance-free rhetoric on free trade, which he knows is best for the country but can’t dare to support in public?


June 26th, 2008

Yeah, you’re right, that’s the worst pandering ever.

It’s nothing like the shameless way John McCain plays the “captured war hero” card at every turn, then shameless votes against our troops/veterans at each and every opportunity.

Because you’re right, RHETORIC is what’s really important, not actions.


Timothy Kincaid

June 26th, 2008

OK, some new rules on this thread going forward:

1. Keep the comments relevant to the thread. ie. this is not a bash-McCain posting, this is about LCR and McCain meeting.

2. Any claims (whether about pandering or what was said or the purpose of the meeting or anything else) will need to be substantiated. Idle speculation, bilious ranting, and wild-eyed accusations will be deleted.

ps. these “new rules” are our same old rules that we require for all comments.


June 26th, 2008

I agree with Mr. Kincaid. We should have separate threads for bashing politicians. There could be categories for how they’re done in; on their own, wholesale, by affiliation, by office and whether describing them as politicians is fitting or euphemistic.


June 30th, 2008

There are shades of LGBT support. McCain is better than most Republicans for opposing a federal marriage amendment. Obama isn’t the best or worst either as he supports civil unions but not marriage.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.