Arizona Anti-Marriage Amendment Re-Vote Likely for Friday

Jim Burroway

June 26th, 2008

Yesterday’s vote by the Arizona Senate to advance an anti-marriage amendment to the voters fell short. But amendment supporters today vow to bring the measure back for another vote on Friday.

The thirty-member chamber voted 14-11 to place a proposed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage onto the ballot. But since the Arizona constitution requires that a majority of the members elected must approve the measure, sixteen votes are needed for passage.

When supporters of the ban realized that they didn’t have enough votes — Sen. Karen Johnson (R-Mesa) had gone on vacation — Sen. Linda Gray (R-Phoenix) switched her vote in a procedural move to allow her to bring the measure back again for another vote. Another vote will likely be called on Friday when Johnson is expected to interrupt her vacation to support the measure.

Which means that come Friday, we may see an anti-marriage amendment placed on the ballot. Arizona residents are encouraged to contact their Senator and voice their opinions. Equality Arizona makes this easy. Just enter your zip code, and their web page will automatically provide you with contact information and talking points. It takes all of three minutes.


June 26th, 2008

Sen. Karen Johnson, who may have the deciding vote, has reportedly been married FIVE times:


June 26th, 2008

Thank you for providing such a great link for those of us in Arizona!

I thought this nonsense was over with. I thought wrong. Seems it will be just a little longer.


June 26th, 2008

I’m sending the link out to all my family and friends. Hopefully they will contact their senators here in Arizona. I hope this doesn’t pass in the senate tomorrow. Otherwise it’s time to start fighting for November. As if we didn’t have a new president to try and elect already … sheesh.

james malenfant

July 26th, 2008

The 15 state senators and legislatures that railroaded this hate amendment should be replaced. These people did not do their jobs. They these elected officials were supposed to create a balanced budget for the state of Arizona. Instead, they advanced their own personal perverted religious agendas. That is not why they were hired to begin with. And when we elected them, we, in effect, hired them. Now we need to fire them.
Linda Gray’s website says she is an expert on education. There is nothing in her educational background that says she is any kind of expert. As a matter of fact she has had contacts with Scientology, a religious cult, and she has had 2 marriages. Hardly an expert on family values and marriage. Basically she is a hate monger who veils her hate in religion and “family values.” Nonesense. A careful reader of her website will discover that she is not qualified to be an Arizona State Senator. Her relationship with Karen Johnson is also suspect.
Karen Johnson has also had contacts with Scientology, and veils her hate in religion and stupidity. She actually believes 9/11 was perpetrated by our government. What a moron. She has been married 5 times. WHat an andvertisement for marriage.
No one has the right to tell two people if they can get married or not. Yet these two women are the Anita Bryants of Arizona in 2008.
As long as we continue to elect these people, and as long as we continue to support them by patronizing their businesses, the hatred and bigotry and discrimination will continue. People like Karen and Linda feel powerful when they oppress an entire group of people. Just like Hitler did when he oppressed the Jews. Just like the United STates did when they denied blacks their civil rights. It is the exact same thing.
THese people feel superior when the deny a group of people their civil rights. THis amendment is not about family values or religion. It is about civil rights. Gay people have as much right to marry as straight people. THese people veil their hate in religion for emotional shock value. BElieve me it is a civil rights issue.
I encourage you to all question your state senators and congressmen about their feelings on these issues before you vote for them. It is the only way we will change the attitude of ARizona.
Don’t take my word for it, look it up. History is full of civil rights issues just like this one.
REmove these people and the problem is gone, thank you, james malenfant.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.