Kolbe and Bee

Jim Burroway

June 27th, 2008

Kolbe and Bee“Tim Bee has demonstrated his toughness and his compassion, his ability to lead while at the same time listening to others. These are skills few people in public life have. We need Tim Bee working for us in Congress.” — Jim Kolbe (left), the gay former U.S. Congressman for the district Tim Bee is running in and the campaign’s “Honorary Chairman.”

Tim Bee was the sixteenth vote in the Arizona Senate’s shameless vote to put the anti-marriage amendment on the ballot yet again. Bee is running for the congressional seat that Kolbe once held. Kolbe voted for DOMA in 1996, a vote that led to his outing. I have heard him speak passionately against Prop 107 in 2006.

So what does Kolbe have to say about this? Is he ducking back into the closet again?

[Hat tip: Tucson Observer]

Patrick ONeill

June 28th, 2008

Dispicable that Kolbe would support Tim BeeGot – just shows how twisted you can become once you become Republican

homer

June 28th, 2008

I wrote Bee a fairly nice email a couple of days ago asking him to explain why he was voting for the issue. Of course he couldn’t be bothered to respond.

He doesn’t have a chance in hell in getting Giffords seat.

Timothy Kincaid

June 28th, 2008

When did Kolbe make that statement of support? If this was a statement made after the vote, then this is a legitimate complaint.

But if this quote is old then this is nothing but a slur, and a cheap one at that, by the Tuscon Observer.

Pulling a quote out of context of dragging a statement of support from the past and pretending it relates to a current situation is something that should be below the Observer’s dignity.

werdna

June 28th, 2008

I don’t think the Observer was suggesting that it was recent quote–it appears on Bee’s website so it was probably from quite a while ago. Nevertheless it’s not simply a matter of the recent vote, Bee was a sponsor of the resolution to put the amendment on the ballot! If he was offended by Bee’s support for the resolution, Kolbe has had plenty of time to retract his endorsement but he hasn’t.

Bee seems to have been trying to get away with a very strange balancing act. He sponsored the resolution but also tried to keep it from coming up for a vote. That way he could claim to have sponsored something that would please the bigots but wouldn’t have to deal with having allowed a stupid and divisive measure onto the ballot. The bigots didn’t seem to be satisfied with his attempt to finesse the issue. Bummer for him and a bummer for the state of Arizona.

Kolbe could easily retract his support for Bee now but do you think he will? Remember Kolbe voted for DOMA when he was in Congress and even after coming out he’s never been a big advocate of same-sex marriage.

Jim Burroway

June 28th, 2008

Kolbe made that statement, I believe, when he decided to become Bee’s honorary chairman. Bee had already signed on as a co-sponsor of an earlier resolution to put an anti-marriage amendment on the ballot when Kolbe made the statement.

I think there comes a time when a man has to choose. Is it politics, or is it about another slam against gay people? Bee’s actions have been all about politics. As werdna says, he’s been trying to thread the needle and play it both ways. So is Kolbe. And frankly, I’m tired of coddling politicians who do that, whether they are gay or straight.

I’m calling on Kolbe to decide whether he’s a man or a politician. We already know what Bee has decided. If Bee cannot stand up to CAP, what makes us think he can stand up to anyone in Washington?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1951: California Gay Bars Given Very Brief Reprieve

Today In History, 1965: Gay Rights Advocates Picket the State Department

Today In History, 1987: Arsonists Burn Florida Family Home of Three Brothers with AIDS

Born On This Day, 1825: Karl Heinrich Ulrichs

Born On this Day, 1921: Nancy Kulp

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 2006: NARTH Official Recommends Peer Shaming for Gender-Variant Elementary School Children

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.