July 16th, 2008
As we’ve shown you before, Randy Thomasson and the Campaign for Children and Families are not likely to go down in history as great thinkers of our generation. I’d go so far as to say that they’re downright loony.
Now it seems that the backers of Proposition 8 want nothing to do with them as well.
Thomasson and CCF were not backers of the current proposition to ban marriage but instead supported an alternate proposition that banned civil unions as well. Their initiative did not get enough signatures, but while it lasted they said unkind things about what is now Proposition 8.
But now Thomasson and CCF want to jump on the band-wagon. And the backers of Proposition 8 are trying to force them out. Publicly.
Law.com reports on efforts to get CCF to shut up and go away.
In a short brief filed Thursday, Folsom, Calif., lawyer Andrew Pugno, counsel for ProtectMarriage.com, argued that rather than back Prop 8, the CCF actively campaigned against it for years in favor of another amendment that would have sharply curtailed all gay rights.
“Only now that the act has qualified for the ballot as Proposition 8 do proposed intervenors support it,” Pugno wrote. “Against this backdrop, there is significant concern that the presence of [the CCF] in this action will substantially interfere with real parties’ ability to effectively defend Proposition 8.”
In an interview Monday, Pugno referred to the CCF as “extremists” who want to go beyond the issue of marriage and “strip away gay rights” of any kind.
Well, Pugno certainly knows Thomasson and his goals. But I would say the differences between them are only a matter of degrees.
(hat tip Good-As-You)
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Richard Rush
July 16th, 2008
I think it’s our job to help keep loons like Thomasson portrayed as the voice of Christianity in front of the general public.
Samantha Davis
July 16th, 2008
Don’t you mean the voice of the radical Christianists?
Richard Rush
July 16th, 2008
“Don’t you mean the voice of the radical Christianists?”
It may feel comforting for moderate Christians to view “radical Christianists” as substantially different from themselves. But I think all variations of Christianity are built upon the same delusional foundation. Once you truly believe in the existence of gods, virgin birth, resurrection, heaven, hell, saviours, and salvation, etc., it really is not that much of a leap to becoming a fundamentalist (&/or a “radical Christianist”). The moderate Christians make it possible for the radicals to exist in such large numbers.
I might feel somewhat differently if I heard the moderates forcefully countering the radicals. But what I do hear forcefully every day are the voices of the radicals.
Virtually 100% of our organized opposition is Christian based. They are motivated, loud, well funded, and persistent. And those we consider our moderate Christian allies are, for the most part, unmotivated, quiet, and unorganized for any significant action on our behalf.
So, if the moderates don’t like the loud loony Thomasson being the voice of Christianity, then let them speak up so we hear a different voice.
Jarred
July 17th, 2008
I find myself wondering if “they’ll hurt our message” is a valid legal argument to prevent a group like the CCF from supporting your cause.
Jarred
July 17th, 2008
Richard:
Moderate Christians have spoken up and some of us have heard their voice. If memory serves, BTB (or was it XGW?) has posted statements from at least two different Mainstream Protestant churches praising the California Supreme Court’s decision in favor of marriage equality. And there are strong pushes in several of these denominations for full inclusion and respect for gay people going on.
If you’re basing your opinion of the moderate Christians’ vocal support of the GLBT community and our fight for full quality soley on the fact that they haven’t amy massive political organizations like the AFA or the CCF, then I might suggest that you don’t understand the way they operate or the reasons for it. Instead of forming their own organizations, they would prefer to get involved with the HRC and already pre-existing gay rights advocacy groups. And indeed, many moderate Christians have done exactly that.
Selly
July 17th, 2008
Thanks Jarred, my thoughts exactly.
And I should add that as far as I can tell, quiet a few, if not most readers/commenters on BTB(including the editors?)are what you would call moderate Christians or some sort of Christians.
Leave A Comment