Boy Scouts of America Votes To Allow Gay Members, Retains Ban On Gay Leaders
Nevada House votes to reverse marriage ban
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, May 23
It's Not the Principle, It's the Prejudice
Congratulations Mitch!
Gay Couples Excluded from Immigration Bill Markup
How To Spot A Swivel-Eyed Loon
The Daily Agenda for Wednesday, May 22
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Timothy Kincaid
July 24th, 2008 | LINK
Donnelly went to Congress to report on a letter she received about the recollections from 1974 of an incident that was never reported. A story, we note, that had decidedly racist overtones.
Is it any surprise that the media is having a field day with her testimony?
Richard W. Fitch
July 24th, 2008 | LINK
Tim: Does anyone have the hard facts regarding the alleged attack on corpsman Yost? I spent nearly 4 hours last nite reviewing the CSPAN video of the hearing and a couple hours today hunting info on Donnelly and the related materials. SDLN, HRC, et al could not have done better had they been allowed to choose the witnesses on either/each side of this hearing. Coleman, Darrah and Vila gave coherent and to-the-point testimony. Donnelly and Jones not only rambled and stammered but felt at liberty to interject their skewed fantasies, without invitation, during the presentations of the Congressmen. Someone, please, give us a heads-up for the next rounds of this hearing.
Adam Robertson
July 24th, 2008 | LINK
I’m delighted that Donnelly & Jones were ruthlessly mocked in a public forum. And I second Richard Fitch’s request for a heads-up on the next hearing. I almost missed out on this one. Had I not checked a few blogs and listened to NPR this morning, I would have missed out entirely, right? I mean, where were Katie Couric & Charlie Gibson?
Timothy Kincaid
July 24th, 2008 | LINK
Richard,
As far as I can tell there is no record at all of this event ever occuring other than a letter that Donnelly claims to have received.
“I have received a letter…” may be very effective for televangelists but it’s incredibly stupid to present such “evidence” as testimony in a Congressional Hearing.
Richard W. Fitch
July 24th, 2008 | LINK
Is the prepared statement of Ms. Donnelly’s testimony on public record? She tried to explain a chart in her written stmt that dealt with the numbers of personnel separated for various reasons. It would be worth studying to see such things as disabled, homeland -vs- deployed overseas, by skill levels, etc. She claims that separation due to DADT is only a small percentage, but what is the real impact on critical assignments?
RWF – Indianapolis IN
Rob
July 24th, 2008 | LINK
I think we should all write Ms Donnelly a nice thank you note for doing such an excellent job of illustrating why DODT is just plain stupid.
tristram
July 24th, 2008 | LINK
You missed the gem from Mr. Jones –
[Donnelly was followed by [retired Army Sgt. Maj. Brian] Jones, a tough-talking businessman who suggested that the military’s tradition of “selfless service” would be undermined by gay men and lesbians. “In the military environment, team cohesion, morale and esprit de corps is a matter of life and death,” he said. His written statement spelled it “esprit decor”;]
What kind of nincompoop thinks having more of us around wouldn’t result in vast improvements to any kind of DECOR !!
Timothy Kincaid
July 24th, 2008 | LINK
perhaps he was less concerned about the spirit of the troops and more worried about the spirit of the drapes.
Rob
July 25th, 2008 | LINK
A copy of the thank you note I left for Ms. Donnelly at the CMR website:
Dear Ms. Donnelly;
Just a brief note to say thank you for the excellent job you did illustrating that DODT is a ridiculous policy. Tales of lesbian swarmings, stumbling, and insulting answers. You’ve done more to promote the cause of gays and lesbians serving openly in the military than you can possibly imagine.
Keep up the good work!
Leave A Comment