“A Personal Attack on Myself and My Family”

Timothy Kincaid

September 3rd, 2008

The San Diego Union-Tribune has received a copy of an e-mail exchange between Doug Manchester, a large contributor to anti-gay marriage Proposition 8, and Paul Wilkins, his chief financial officer. In it Wilkins expresses concern about the financial impact that a boycott could have on Manchester’s hotel properties and offered suggestions as to how to diminish the threat.

Manchester had an interesting response

“I appreciate your rightful concern,” Manchester wrote in a July 29 response, but he added: “I am now really angry and I consider this a personal attack on myself and my family.”

What a telling example of the mindset that the anti-gay Culture Warriors have created in our country. The existence of my family is considered a personal attack on theirs. Even suggesting that they not put funds towards harming my family is a threat to their family.

Mr. Manchester may be a charming person. And his hotels, I hear, are lovely. But for as long as Doug Manchester defines the health and vitality of his family by the destruction and dismissal of my own, I’ll not contribute a cent to his business ventures nor in any way enrich his him or his clan.

Further, those in the San Diego area may wish to contact Fred Karger with Californians Against Hate and set aside some time towards reminding Mr. Manchester that one isn’t entitled to become indignant when one’s attack on other families and their freedoms are questioned.

fannie

September 4th, 2008

Wow.

In what universe does calling out Manchester’s attack on our families constitute an attack on his family?

How warped.

GDad

September 5th, 2008

I really think people like that won’t stop until we are all dead or converted to self-loathing closet-case “Christians”.

Seriously people, get a life! My family is no threat to yours. Sheesh.

Robert O\'Brien

September 8th, 2008

I’m sure he’s quaking. I suggest dropping your sense of entitlement. If you want gay “marriage,” then get off of your lazy arse and do the hard work of passing an amendment. Using an activist judiciary to subvert the democratic process is illegitimate.

Jason D

September 9th, 2008

“Using an activist judiciary to subvert the democratic process is illegitimate.”

In America, we have this system of checks and balances, you should look into it. It’s not subverting the democratic process, it’s part of it.

The Constitution and Bill of Rights aren’t optional. They’re the basis for our government and any law that flagrantly violates those two documents has a good chance of being struck down.

Marla Stevens

November 12th, 2008

The mood that Manchester’s H8 has left me in, he should be worried.
The fun part is that I have the rest of my life to get even — even if that’s just watching the positive effects of simple attrition mount up.
— No More Mrs. Nice Gay

Chris Pell

November 18th, 2008

Fellow member of DIA (the Drug Information Association) holding one of SD’s largest 2009 Conventions – Please boycott these hotels.

If you work for a Pharma/Biotech/Medical Device, or Contract Research Organization please stay elsewhere.

We have cancelled our reservations at the Hyatt – please do the same.

Kendal

November 19th, 2008

Why would naming Pro Prop 8 donors make people uncomfortable? They have the right to give money to whom they want but I have the right to boycott bigots like Doug Manchester. Too bad he doesn’t like the financial impact this will have on his business!! I for one and thrilled he is worried and the more people swing to the left the more the right businesses will suffer I make it my purpose in life to know where me and my partner’s money goes and we will not support any businesses who do not think we should have the same rights. Neither do my 3 straight sisters and brothers, my cousins, friends…..our reach is far and the money is deep so pro prop 8 supporters BEWARE.

MM

January 30th, 2009

Im all for gay people being able to get married, and i think its okay to list the names of companies and people that donated, but individuals shouldnt have their addresses and phone numbers listed to the world. i think thats wrong.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.