Rabbis Oppose Proposition 8

Timothy Kincaid

September 26th, 2008

Anti-marriage activists like to present their constitutional amendment efforts as appealing to those “from secular and faith backgrounds, from Christian to Jewish, Mormon to Muslim“. The amendments are based, they’ll tell you, on “Judeo-Christian values”.

But their Judeo-Christian efforts seem to be missing the “Judeo” component.

The LA Times is reporting that the Board of Rabbis of Southern California has overwhelmingly decided to oppose Proposition 8.

The board — a collection of leaders from the Reconstructionist, Reform, Conservative and Orthodox movements — this week declared its opposition to the measure, which would amend the California Constitution to define marriage as only between a man and a woman. Leaders of the board said they wanted protect the civil rights of gay and lesbian couples.

And this was not some rote decision by some ivory towered committee

The board has more than 290 members. Roughly 120 took part in Wednesday’s vote, the largest number of rabbis to weigh in on such an issue in recent memory. Vogel said Friday that 93% of those who cast votes supported the resolution.

Many of the Rabbis do not support religious same-sex marriages within their faith. But they recognize that the terms of civil marriage should not be dictated by a religious majority.

So where then is the Jewish support for Proposition 8?

Well, perhaps they are referring to Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc. After all, I doubt the “New Testament Jews” are part of the Board of Rabbis.

Emily K

September 26th, 2008

“But their Judeo-Christian efforts seem to be missing the “Judeo” component.”

DAMN STRAIGHT!!!

“Judeo-Christian” is an oxymoron anyway.

Yes Timothy, you are correct to be skeptical of “Jewish New Testament Publications” – it is NOT Jewish. It is “Messianic Jewish,” which is a form of Christianity dressed up to look like American Ashkenazi Judaism. So much for the “Judeo” part indeed.

Emily K

September 26th, 2008

Timothy, I took a look at the endorsement orgs and the only truly Jewish one there is the Orthodox Union. They are Orthodox Jews, naturally politically and socially conservative.

cd

September 27th, 2008

In American politics “Judeo-Christian” tends to be a term only the Christian Right uses, and then to describe itself.

There is little or no documented public usage of the term by Jewish organizations and politicians, or by moderate or liberal Christians.

Joel

September 28th, 2008

So i was speaking with a good friend of mine and i have lingering question that i thought i knew the answer to(out of topic) do the sodomy laws in the states have any constitutional suppor as far as private, consentual sodomy is concerned? I thought the Lawrence vs Texas case made all sodomy laws in all states(including Puerto Rico) unconstitutional.

Suricou Raven

September 28th, 2008

Joel: Technicly, yes. A few states do still have them on the books, but this is only because no politician has yet initiated the formal procedure to get them revoked. They are not enforced, and if they ever were enforced the court would almost certinly throw them out entirely.

Note that Lawrence did not have anything to do with equality at all – the sodomy law was thrown out as a violation of privacy, not equality under the law. In practical terms, this means both that the case can’t be used as a precident in trying to get same-sex marriage and that legislatures can’t ‘cheat’ by declaring heterosexual anal sex illegal as well and claiming this means everyone is equal.

Joel

September 29th, 2008

“Joel: Technicly, yes” Mmmm. Technicly yes the sodomy laws are still substantial or technicly yes they are unconstitutional and unenforcable?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1646: Execution in New Netherlands Colony

Today In History, 1741: An Early Ex-Gay Testimony

Today In History, 1962: Supreme Court Rules Physique Magazines Are Not Pornographic

Today In History, 1972: United Church of Christ Ordains First Gay Minister

Today In History, 1978: Rainbow Flag Debuts

Born On This Day, 1935: Larry Kramer

Born On This Day, 1963: George Michael

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.