A Newspaper Endorses Proposition 8

Timothy Kincaid

October 11th, 2008

Well, we knew it had to happen and finally it has.

Although there are a string of newspapers opposing Proposition 8 and although that list ranges from big city behemoths to rural community news sources, from liberal to conservative, English and Spanish, we knew that some day, somewhere, an editorial board would favor the anti-marriage proposition.

They came close with the Modesto Bee. Although the editors in Modesto discussed the proposition in terms of “defining marriage” rather than taking away the rights of citizens, they ultimately decided to leave it up to the voter and made no recommendation.

But now supporters of Proposition 8 have cause to rejoice. They finally have a newspaper endorsement, the Paradise Post.

The Paradise Post is the local newspaper for Paradise, a mountain town in Butte County, a conservative area that supported Proposition 22 by 69%. Paradise has a population of perhaps 30,000 and the Post has a circulation of about 8,000. It’s not much surprise that the supporters of the anti-marriage should have found an ally in this local paper.

The Post editorial goes on a bit about how they are not homophobic (“Nothing could be further from the truth”) but the bulk of their editorial is about “radical redefinition”, warnings about polygamy, and fear about the evil intent of “gay activists”. Their closing argument is a masterpiece in unintended irony:

Tolerance of homosexual couples is one thing. And we are certainly all for tolerance. But condoning, embracing, giving society’s official stamp of approval (which is precisely what legal gay marriage does) is quite another. Please vote YES on Proposition 8.


October 11th, 2008

“Tolerance of homosexual couples is one thing. And we are certainly all for tolerance. But condoning, embracing, giving society’s official stamp of approval (which is precisely what legal gay marriage does) is quite another. Please vote YES on Proposition 8.”

This IS what it means to tolerate. To do any more is to embrace, support, and even admire. Homosexuals continue asking for “tolerance”, when in reality they want complete acceptance. That is an entirely different thing, and I don’t believe you will receive it from the majority of Christians who believe it (homosexuality) is against the natural purpose of humankind.

Timothy Kincaid

October 11th, 2008

What gay citizens want is equality under the law. It isn’t yours to grant or deny, Tamara.

It is an inalienable right (look it up) granted by the Creator. Sometimes you have to fight for your rights, but it is good to know that it exists outside the will of bigots, homophobes, or “the majority of Christians”.


October 11th, 2008

Another Newspaper has come out against Prop 8. Not sure if its big enough to add to your list: Vacaville Reporter


Timothy Kincaid

October 11th, 2008

Thanks Pomo

I absolutely want to include the Vacaville Reporter. Often times these smaller newspapers reach rural conservative voters that are suspicious of the Times or the Chronicle.


October 12th, 2008

I just did a quick calculation and at a guess the total circulation of the papers opposing Prop. 8 is around 3.5 million and may even be as high as 4 million. In other words, the Paradise Post is outnumbered almost five hundred to one.

If only the Yes/No campaigns’ funding balance was the same; the “No on 8” campaign would be able to solve California’s budget crisis with the left-overs!


October 12th, 2008

To “tolerate” by origin means to endure pain; I would understand it now as allowing something, without any implication of condoning or approving of it. On a purely semantic basis, I agree with Tamara. We should rather speak of respect, or emphasise that this is purely a matter of law: if you consider marriage to be sacred, and think of it as defined by law, then you are in effect idolising the state.

It seems to me that talking of “tolerance” implies disrespect towards others

Stefano A

October 12th, 2008


Where did you derivey the etymolgy of “tolerate” to be to endure pain?

Pain is not the etymology of “tolerate” to “endure pain” is simply one of many examples of what one might endure.

The etymology of tolerate is from the Latin tolerātus to endure or to bear. And in this context to tolerate would mean to endure without hindrance.

While your symantic use of “respect” in this context would mean to give deference to.

Either way, what are you suggesting? That those of faith should be above the law? In other words that we should be ruled by a religious theocracy rather than a democracy?

Stefano A

October 12th, 2008

BTW: Our form of democratic governments already “respect”, i.e. give deference to, the rights of individual personal religious beliefs by not imposing state interference upon religious internal affairs. The government makes no decisions one way or the other with regard to deciding religious theology or dogma. And the government is not being asked to do so.

However, some people of faith such as Tamara are demanding that neither respect or endurance of homosexuality be given to homosexuals specifically with regard to democratic laws and often times extending that further to mean no endurance of or respect for in any way or manner.

Tolerance has nothing to do with either condonement or embracement but endurance.

Therein lies the irony of

Tolerance of homosexual couples is one thing. And we are certainly all for tolerance. But condoning, embracing, giving society’s official stamp of approval (which is precisely what legal gay marriage does) is quite another.


October 12th, 2008

I immediately recognized the Welcome to Paradise sign when the page loaded, because I have lived in Paradise my whole life (21 years). No wonder it was so difficult for me to come out. This is my first election as a registered voter, and I’m proud to be one more no vote. =)


October 12th, 2008

“Where did you derivey the etymolgy of “tolerate” to be to endure pain?” – Stefano A

There are many words which have meanings that have changed over time to become something completely different from the original. Gay is a perfect example: its original meaning is synonymous with happy, bright or colourful, yes now it is used – derogatively – to mean debased, inferior or bad.

Likewise empathogens are a class of serotonergic drugs that induce a powerful feeling of happiness and love – even though the Greek root “pathos” means “suffering”.

Priya Lynn

October 12th, 2008

The Post editorial says they are not homophobic but that they don’t condone, embrace, or approve of gay couples. That is the essence of homophobia.

Stefano A

October 12th, 2008

There are many words which have meanings that have changed over time to become something completely different from the original.

Duncan stated that “by origin” the etymology of tolerate meant to endure pain. That is an untrue assertion.

And your point, while having a certain degree of obtuse relevance does not discount my statement about the etymological origin that Duncan claimed.

And none of the following:the Unabridged DictionaryAmerican Heritage DictionaryWordNetAmerican Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, orThe Oxford English Dictionaryattribute the meaning of “tolerate” to be “to condone or embrace”.

Tolerate under no connotative reference is given to denote “condonement or embracfement”. Each and every denotative and connotative reference is related to tolerate has to do with “putting up with” to use a vernacular, or some form of endurance, not condonement or embrace.

My point stands.

Stefano A

October 12th, 2008

Hmmm. Sorry for the runon list of dictionary references without punction. The list code did not work and I hadn’t previewed my post to see if it would be accepted.

Stefano A

October 12th, 2008

Oh, and I meant abstruse with its “esoteric” connotation not obtuse. (My bad.)

Stefano A

October 12th, 2008

Now, some may denounce mere tolerance as being no longer acceptable and instead demand acceptance by all. But that is another issue entirely than what I was addressing about the meaning of the word tolerate or the phrase “to tolerate”. And even then they are not using tolerate as being synonymous of acceptance. The words have two distinct and still current meanings. Unless you are aware of some small doctrinal group that has made the meaning of the two words synonymouos. Which I do not believe to be the case in standard usage.


October 13th, 2008

As a christian (who is going to attempt to become a pastor[getting ready to start candidacy]) And a liberal I find it offensive when people refer as Tamara did to the “majority of Christians” as basically un-accepting of gay rights. Christians are a diverse, huge group, and I was raised by Christians who not only believe that the Queer community deserves full marriage rights, I am one of those Christians!

BTW as a Texan I can’t vote on any of these amendments, sometimes I feel like the hearts and minds phase of the Texas race for equality is 10 marathons strung together.


October 13th, 2008


As a Christian, even though you don’t live in one of these states, you may feel called to act in ways you find acceptable with the teachings of Christ and the acts of the apostles.

For some Christians, salvation is achieved through good works and faith, although some Christians have differing opinions on the topic of salvation and don’t necessarily equate good works with it. That’s a legitimate discourse, however – good works seems to me to be a good default regardless of belief or theology.

I think also by studying with an open mind and thirst for knowledge the origins of the Church, the authentic gospel of Jesus, the historical Jesus, the history of Judea in the first century under Roman rule, Jewish and Roman cultural norms during the era of Christ, and the evolution and translation of the modern bible (Hebrew bible and New Covenant), you gain a deeper and more authoritative knowledge than your typical “bible-thumper” who quotes scripture out of context in order to further a prejudice that they base in the bible.

For example, anti-gay Christians who seek to cite New Testament (aka “New Covenant”) scripture to show homosexuality as especially sinful use passages in Romans and 1&2 Timothy. Both of these references are highly disputed, especially Romans.


Also, many anti-gay Christians either overlook or are unaware the passage in Matthew 8 regarding Jesus healing the Centurion’s “servant”, which the Centurion was distraught over. Anyone who has studied Roman history would immediately find this extremely odd – that a Roman citizen would feel anything at all for a slave, since slaves were viewed as lower than animals and Roman citizens were quite use to slaves being slaughtered for entertainment.

In fact, the original Greek calls this person in Matthew a “pais”, which the Greeks would know as the younger lover of an older man.

Jesus, upon witnessing the Centurion’s grief over his lover and the extraordinary faith of, not a Jew like Jesus and his disciples, but a Gentile (!) to follow Christ rewards him and heals the youth. There is no condemning. No reservations. Jesus rewards those who have faith, blesses them, and – even more radically – rewards the loved ones of the faithful “in abstentia”.


October 13th, 2008

PS Please ignore my numerous grammatical and spelling errors!

ex: “in abstentia”…correct: “in absentia”



October 13th, 2008

I totally agree with you, and will read your post more in depth after I write a paper for one of my college classes. I noticed your discussion of 1&2nd Timothy, which, when in discussion with some of my friends I have mentioned and tried to go into more depth about the problems with the language, and the fact that they were written for specific people and town churches. I don;t think that I can understand the Bible new or old testament without understanding some about the cultures that birthed them

Thank you for your heartfelt words and while I can’t donate money ( I literally have 2 dollars in my bank account), I have been talking to my grandma in Florida, and my family in California about these amendments. Thankfully my Grandma is already in opposition to the amendment, but my Uncle is taking a little longer.


October 24th, 2008

It should come as no surprise that the Mormon religion which used to forbid blacks from joining their cult are the main group behind the proposition that will eliminate the rights of another minority group. Also, does anyone know if the rumor I heard is true? Are the Knights of Columbus (another big sponsor of Prop 8) aligned with the Ku Klux Klan? I heard that they are the Catholic version of the Ku Klux Klan. Anyone who supports Prop 8 should think twice before adding their support to groups such as these. They are NOT about personal liberties and freedom. Quite the opposite, their goal is to take away civil rights. They need to be exposed for who they are….


October 24th, 2008

I get VERY tired of the religious argument when it comes to gay marriage. ALL marriages should become civil marriages, as they are in France. The government there does not recognize religious ceremonies, and EVERY couple must go to city hall to get married. If a couple wants holy matrimony in a house of worship, then they are entitled to it, but it isn’t a legal marriage. Wouldn’t that once and for all end this silly debate about what the bible has to say? So, shouldn’t atheists have a right to marry, too? Take your god out of MY government!

mary jones

November 3rd, 2008

tell me,is there any good reasons for voting yes on 8? All i can get out of people is that “it will restore traditional marrage” and “gay marriage will be taught to our children in school”. Guess what? there are a whole lot worse things in school. Take it from the seventh grader who is typing this out. If this passes, we will be discriminating people. I thought this was supposed to be a free country. Think about it. what if your child or granchild was gay? would you want them not to be able to marry thier true love?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts


Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.